I think the point is that the case is about the procedures undertaken by CCC regarding the loan to ACL.
So not really to do with CCFC as such. Any contact was between SISU and CCC so SISU would already have title to their side of the documents.
The costs. These must be mounting up. 8 barristers and lawyers for the Higgs case 5 for this today, time and cost of putting a 110 page statement together with 2500 supporting documents, a detailed experts report on the ACL loan deal........ and we haven't got to the main event yet.
I know things are never clear cut in putting things to a court but their counter claim dismissed as no basis in law, a lengthy & costly statement dismissed, an experts report stated as not relevant ............. does make you wonder as to what they are doing and the advice they are getting
It wasn't really a case of winners or losers as such today ....... it was a process to go through that is quite normal usually.....but it does come across as a miscalculation by SISU though
ps Simon could have put SISU QC on twitter stupot would have been more accurate