Skyblueweeman
Well-Known Member
Down a rabbit hole? Okey doke.
Your response says more about you my friend than it does me.....
With all due respect: What a stupid fucking question.
The fact this even needs to be asked should tell you exactly how far down the rabbit hole you are.
No mate, I’m a secret agent across multiple message boards building cover for 20 years just in case all this happened.
FFS.
Down a rabbit hole? Okey doke.
Your response says more about you my friend than it does me.....
Of course it does. I’m a council plant sent back in time to stop Nick getting to the truth
Fucking fruit loop.
Of course it does. I’m a council plant sent back in time to stop Nick getting to the truth
Fucking fruit loop.
There was a parody twitter account of "kov blog"... came accross it while looking for the original a few months back.
Not sure if it is still running.
....it was VERY similar to at least one of the parody accounts we have become so accustom to in our discussions on here!.... hmmmmmm!
Fruit loop? What its your effing problem? I asked you a question because rather than wanting what's best for Coventry, you seem to seek vindication for CCC/Wasps actions. I'd like to think I'm rather impartial on the situation. But with you, it seems the impartiality is tempered by justification for CCC actions.
If people have released evidence that other parties are up to no good, then they're up to no good. Stop trying to discredit those who are giving cold hard evidence.
Feel free to come back with some snidey comment shmmeee. I'm back to work so won't reply as I cba any further.
Great you’ll be able to post this “evidence” and shut me up then. Nicks been trying for years and hasn’t managed, maybe you’ll have better luck.
If you think I don’t want what’s best for CCFC, I’m not a fan, when as I’ve said I’ve been posting on various forums under the same name for over twenty years. Then yes, you’re a fruit loop, a nut bar, one sandwich short of a picnic.
No doubt this is “snidey” where as all your implications about me are just impartial observations.
Here’s the game: you discuss with evidence backing up your points and I’ll be sensible and discuss things with you as many many members can attest. You spout ludicrous conspiracy theories, randomly bring my family into it, claim I’m here for some nefarious reason, and I’ll treat you like the insulting moron you are.
The commitment is an interesting point, as always it’ll hinge on word definition (yay!). The leaked council report states:
"It will include a requirement in agreements underpinning the sale that this option must exist for CCFC subject to it reaching a commercial agreement with ACL.”
Now it could be argued that CCFC and Wasps reached a commercial agreement, and therefore Wasps are in breach. Of course it can also be argued that the phrase “commercial terms” is just shorthand for “everything but the indemnity issue”, would be interesting to see the wording of that agreement.
Can we ask to see it?
Worth a FOI request do you think? Could be considered commercially confidential.
Is that a question to be asked at the meeting Shmmeee?
May need to edit the tone a bit.
Worth a FOI request do you think? Could be considered commercially confidential.
For someone who gets a hard ride on here,unjustified in my opinion, I think your response to Skyblueweeman was harsh. He asked a question and got a volley in return. It wasn’t a question that warranted such a bilious comeback.Great you’ll be able to post this “evidence” and shut me up then. Nicks been trying for years and hasn’t managed, maybe you’ll have better luck.
If you think I don’t want what’s best for CCFC, I’m not a fan, when as I’ve said I’ve been posting on various forums under the same name for over twenty years. Then yes, you’re a fruit loop, a nut bar, one sandwich short of a picnic.
No doubt this is “snidey” where as all your implications about me are just impartial observations.
Here’s the game: you discuss with evidence backing up your points and I’ll be sensible and discuss things with you as many many members can attest. You spout ludicrous conspiracy theories, randomly bring my family into it, claim I’m here for some nefarious reason, and I’ll treat you like the insulting moron you are.
Have I missed somebody say Shmmeee is paid by the council in this thread?
Fucking weird. If in doubt, make some shit up that hasn't been said.
Relax mate, I'm worried for your blood pressure.
I don't think FOI is the best way forward tbhWorth a FOI request do you think? Could be considered commercially confidential.
Here’s the game: you discuss with evidence backing up your points and I’ll be sensible and discuss things with you as many many members can attest. You spout ludicrous conspiracy theories, randomly bring my family into it, claim I’m here for some nefarious reason, and I’ll treat you like the insulting moron you are.
Want to check FOI success rate since Duggins took over? Cov observer had a couple of articles on it.Worth a FOI request do you think? Could be considered commercially confidential.
Tbf, everybody who posts on here does, surely?Do you want what's best for CCFC?
I think you may have asked the wing question at the wrong time and ended up collateral damageSo...
* Do emails 'leaked' over the last few months not show questionable behaviour of the council? Yes or no? I don't the time to go back and find such 'evidence' but I'm sure you will have seen them.
* Please show me where I've spouted ludicrous conspiracy theories? If I've postulated anything, it's exactly that...a theory. But ludicrous...tell me what's ludicrous about my opinion?
* Where did I bring your family into anything? I will pay a tenner to a charity of your choice if you can find me just ONE post where I've said anything to you about your family that can be viewed as hurtful, bad taste or snidey. I've NEVER said anything about any members of your family. I've seen something on here that your dad is involved in the council but I don't know who he is or what he's called. Like I said, back up your claim where I've randomly brought your family into it and I'll make a charitable donation.
* Where have I claimed you're here for a nefarious reason? It's a sensationalist word but again...back up your claim where I've insinuated any sort of criminal activity on your part. Another tenner to charity if you can find that one as well.
PM me if you want to provide evidence and of the above and I'll pay £20 to a charity of your choice. Until then, stop with the aggressiveness and lies on my part.
It's unwarranted shmmeee.
Tbf, everybody who posts on here does, surely?
I think you may have asked the wing question at the wrong time and ended up collateral damage
Great you’ll be able to post this “evidence” and shut me up then. Nicks been trying for years and hasn’t managed, maybe you’ll have better luck.
If you think I don’t want what’s best for CCFC, I’m not a fan, when as I’ve said I’ve been posting on various forums under the same name for over twenty years. Then yes, you’re a fruit loop, a nut bar, one sandwich short of a picnic.
No doubt this is “snidey” where as all your implications about me are just impartial observations.
Here’s the game: you discuss with evidence backing up your points and I’ll be sensible and discuss things with you as many many members can attest. You spout ludicrous conspiracy theories, randomly bring my family into it, claim I’m here for some nefarious reason, and I’ll treat you like the insulting moron you are.
the ignore button works so very well !! so that's Grendel and shmmeee on the naughty step for the forseeable future, and I'm more relaxed than before
And besides, if you’re not careful he’ll punch you in the kneecap.Seriously Shmeeee you need to back away from this for a while.
Weeman is one of the most rational posters on here, and entered into debate with you on a seemingly honest level. He DID NOT bring your family into it, but in your red mist you clearly think he has.
I don't care a jot about your row with Nick, but your insults to Weeman are in my humble opinion out of line and demean any rational argument you make on this thread.
Seriously Shmeeee you need to back away from this for a while.
Weeman is one of the most rational posters on here, and entered into debate with you on a seemingly honest level. He DID NOT bring your family into it, but in your red mist you clearly think he has.
I don't care a jot about your row with Nick, but your insults to Weeman are in my humble opinion out of line and demean any rational argument you make on this thread.
I don't think he will see this for some reason...Let’s be honest in real life as on here I suspect you have been ignored most of your life
I don't think he will see this for some reason...
Sure but not sure it works like thatWhen you have your next cosy chat with Seppalla ask her or her minion Boddy if the EU judgement is against the club will she put her thumb up and call it a day and refuse to appeal? Ask the council as well if it goes the other way. The council will not answer - as she now it seems is on side she I assume will
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?