I don't think anyone has a personal agenda against the main people involved. Look objectively at everything that has happened under SISU's tenure-the idea of yet another season with them at the helm is incomprehensible to myself and many others. The language varies but the sentiments don't.
Hold on, where's the faux moral outrage?
You say, as facts(though nobody knows yet), that ACL and the Council were going to do what the court documents allege, but didn't just becuae they were worried they'd get caught?
This incessant defending and obfuscation of anything the council/ACL do is going a bit far now.
It's like some sort of hive-mind that has lost the ability for independent thought.
Ok maybe using the word "fact" was not appropriate so I will instead replace that with " the accused being ACL and CCC".... thank you for pointing this out.
As I say the actions that were being brought forward to ACL/CCC was not followed through and that was maybe like I said due threats of such actions getting leaked out or a sense of moral duty may have come into play (which I doubt) ... Remember there are Politian's in CCc/ACL who behave just as bad as SISU no doubts about that.
With me defending ACL/CCC is a no brainer. They are the guardians of our tax payers money (God help us) and are tying too look after the assets of the City of Coventry whereupon all I have seen in SISU, showing a disregard to the City of Coventry, CCFC, the fans, and other organisations such as Higgs who have contributed a hell of a lot to the city. Do you honestly think SISU give a damn about the fans and the club or is it just an attempt suck the city dry by stripping one of its two major asset paid for by the people of Coventry. I don't give damn if SISU own CCFC or not, all they have contributed since taking over is failure after failure and the worrying thing is some ccfc fans seem to thrive on this and are hell bent on breaking the actual backbone of the the city and allowing outside entities to rape the city and its football club of its resources.
So yes, out of the two who I may say are bad as each other, I am defending ACL/CCC.
Yeah that sounds possible and I can imagine SISU saying well we'd like to put in a pittance for the lease and the bank saying no chance. If it wasn't for SISU obviously thinking out loud that the rent should be as close to zero as possible and also not paying, then the Ricoh lease doesn't seem to me to be a bad buy.If it was secured against anything it would be the lease. York Bank aren't in the business of managing stadiums so now doubt they would have looked to sell the lease on to recover as much of the debt as they could. Wonder who would be interested in buying that?!
I think we can accept that there was an issue between ACL and the bank as a bailout was required. It's not that difficult to imagine the bank had a conversation with SISU about what would happen if the bank eneded up owning the lease as they would be the most likley purchasers.
Really? I mean, really?
Sisu are finished here, a busted flush, no need to fight battles that are already won, need to look ahead to the issues with ACL/CCC already.
The constant polarisation of Sisu bad/ACL-CCC good doesn't help, it's highly possible, even probable that both are bad.
I don't think Sisu will give up, they will take this right to the wire. They have no interest in how this will affect the club.Sisu are finished here, a busted flush, no need to fight battles that are already won, need to look ahead to the issues with ACL/CCC already.
The constant polarisation of Sisu bad/ACL-CCC good doesn't help, it's highly possible, even probable that both are bad.
If this is true - I need to stress that it has not been confirmed by other sources - then we need to rethink the perception of sisu being the devil incarnated trying to pray on a local council and a charity foundation. If this is true it was a joint plan by all involved.
We may also need to wonder if 'CCC will NEVER sell their part of ACL to sisu' was another 'marketing' statement to sustain the pressure on Yorkshire Bank.
The objective was to restructure the 'food chain' of the football club - make sure it stood on financial solid ground and generated enough income to be independant of constant extra funding and had revenue to make it possible to have a squad under SCMP that can compete in the leagues.
As one of the cornerstones in the plan was to acquire the Higgs shares - then the club would own 50% of ACL. And by writing down ACL's debts to the price of the mortgage, ACL effetively goes up in value. It's a twisted investment, but one that actually produce an immediate asset increase in the clubs balance sheet (opposite of asset stripping).
I am wondering why PWKH hasn't had his say on this matter. To be fair, he's usually very quick to log on and to keep us informed of events. Even if it's only from his point-of-view, it's always worth a read.
Really? I mean, really?
Sisu are finished here, a busted flush, no need to fight battles that are already won, need to look ahead to the issues with ACL/CCC already.
The constant polarisation of Sisu bad/ACL-CCC good doesn't help, it's highly possible, even probable that both are bad.
Surely the council should be congratulated for stopping SISU/CCFC from attempting to cheat the bank, (which may be illegal - fraud possibly?) rather than condemned.
Shouldn't be congratulated if the fraud was being operated in collusion with the council surely?
But if* they decided instead not to proceed with the hair brained scheme (if indeed it ever happened) and then buy out the Yorkshire Bank then they have saved SISU from themselves.Shouldn't be congratulated if the fraud was being operated in collusion with the council surely?
Remember your anti-SISU roots! Do you really believe this bullshit line that they're spinning? Really?
But if* they decided instead not to proceed with the hair brained scheme (if indeed it ever happened) and then buy out the Yorkshire Bank then they have saved SISU from themselves.
*and we should remember that no evidence has actually been seen yet to back up the SISU claims.
There has also been an unusual silence from PWKH and council officials on this, down to sub-judice I expect.
Very strange that you "Pick up" on the silence of PWKH and CCC.
How come you've not done the same with SISU over the last 6 years?
Because they have chosen to stay away from media such as this. PWKH has been in here purely as it is a friendly environment where he would get a million likes if he just posted that he fed his cat tuna fish. You would be grovelling thanking him for keeping you informed. There have of late however been more challenges and criticisms. As a consequence the appearances have become less and less and now total silence.
Whatever you have to say Grendel means nothing and abusing someone that is part and had relevance in this whole situation you may think is clever but is dumb !!!
At least when he was posting it was more information we were getting from any other side. Obviously everyone was able to make their own judgement on what he said but that is lost now well done if that is what you set out to achieve !!!
Because they have chosen to stay away from media such as this. PWKH has been in here purely as it is a friendly environment where he would get a million likes if he just posted that he fed his cat tuna fish. You would be grovelling thanking him for keeping you informed. There have of late however been more challenges and criticisms. As a consequence the appearances have become less and less and now total silence.
I'm just not sure how anyone physically has the time to sit through and critically analyse all that information, unless the High Court employs cyber-beaureaucrats.
Along with witness statements and so on it has copies of all the legal agreements that are mentioned. I am not a lawyer and can't comment on its length but it fills five lever arch files!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?