Let's see if he can show us why, I would have put Ponticelli on.
Is the undercurrent to that post that he's been written off by the fans already
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
I'll let the gamekeeper know, because I'd rather have a poacher on than Shipley.Why? He’s a poacher? Jones is a creative player, Shipley at least is meant to be creative as a CM?
Think the BBC must be watching a different game then. Shows they’ve had 56% possession and 5 shots to our 1on top, a few decent crosses by Haynes already.
On left midfield?I'll let the gatekeeper know, because I'd rather have a poacher on than Shipley.
great play by nazon, gets to the line, cuts it back to 6 yard box and no one there
Ball into the box and Kelly standing on the half way line with four others
Great play by duck no one there to tap in
Hhhmmmm. MR ought to be able to prevent that from happening.
We had 3-4 decent balls in the box tbf. Shame the only 2 strikers who attack crosses are on the bench.See the problem is we don’t create chances so no pointicelli in playing any striker.
Left wing.We playing three in the middle now Shipley is on or is he on a wing?
For the drawWhy are we playing two central defensive midfielders - sideways backwards sideways backwards etc etc etc .
Left wing.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
So our opponents don't score too many. MR knows that we'll never score many, if any at all.Why are we playing two central defensive midfielders - sideways backwards sideways backwards etc etc etc .
But what we have done here now is to take an attacking midfielder off and replace him with a more defensive minded midfielder.I know we're short of goals, but playing 4 strikers would be a bit excessive. Shipley is the right sub IMO.
Just get an attacking threat down the other side and jones gets injured grrrrrr
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?