Skybluefaz
Well-Known Member
Reading, near enough
Reading, near enoughWell il pretend he did to fit the narrative
Are we at a point where if you don't do it you will be rendered a disgrace? How very authoritarianBoth clubs coming into criticism? It’s only fucking sky that keep banging on about it
I'll raise you £20mNot for £3m though more like £15m
Jobi never played for QPRThey would, 2 QPR ex players on the panel
Fair play to Mark Warburton, made the Sky Presenter look a right prick!
Just been told, I'm sorryJobi never played for QPR
Think QPR manager said it early enough. You can’t expect teams to make the call every game. They either do it or they don’t. It can’t come from the individual players or it causes more grief.Are we at a point where if you don't do it you will be rendered a disgrace? How very authoritarian
Warburton TWO FOOTS reporter with LOGIC
Yeah, I agree. The first Coventry goal was tragic defending from QPR. I’d have been livid if Cov had conceded a goal like that. The second goal as well, O Hare shouldn’t have gotten free that easily, but Dabo did well. The third goal was understandable though, good cross and header.For real?
Even when we were penned in, they didn’t create a clear cut opportunity. After the second half, we were by far the better side. Defensively, QPR looked all over the shop - our two open play goals were pretty soft and we should’ve scored before McFadz winner.
Agreed they did cream over O’Hares goal TBF, but there was a definite QPR bias throughout. And the only thing they knew about us was We have 164 Championship “caps” (wtf?) or whatever and 114 are Kyle McFadzean.
Terrible coverage all round. Really clueless.
Fantastic performance and result. Well done lads shame the woke virtual signaling Sky presenters are more interested in why we didnt bend the knee to a marxist anarchist movement.Fuck off, asking McFadz why they didnt take the knee.
Yes he did to be fairone did say o hares goal was comparable to Messi
It’s not just America though is it? It’s a global thing, that originated in the US because they are the worst at it. People are people wherever they live and we should all support our fellow citizens. Regardless of the colour of their skin.What's the importance, support of oppressed peoples in America?
Actually overall I felt like we were far more dangerous than them going forward... How much did they actually create over 90?
Now asking Robins who says decision came from QPR. Says he wants clarity on rules as well
Says it all about the BLM and skyAre we at a point where if you don't do it you will be rendered a disgrace? How very authoritarian
Both managers agree. Take the knee, but make it a directive.
QPR didn't create that much but they looked at ease on the ball and had very skilful outlets down both wings. Asayi Samuel looked unplayable at times and I felt it was just a matter of time before they clicked and he set someone up. I didn't rate their striker, Dykes. Actual chances? Not many, no.
I’m thinking that’s the point where it leaves the match thread.Says it all about the BLM and sky
It’s not just America though is it? It’s a global thing, that originated in the US because they are the worst at it. People are people wherever they live and we should all support our fellow citizens. Regardless of the colour of their skin.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?