CWR (10 Viewers)

Nick · Jan 4, 2020

The eakin one is a Parody I think.

Yep Linnell's words were "I don't believe Wasps are insisting CCFC sign an indemnity clause. All they want is for an agreement between themselves and the football club that no further action will be pursued. If they do that, Wasps will welcome them back tomorrow"

He then said:

"There are one or two people out there who are putting things out on social media and trying to be mischievous"

Strange, Linnell is doing exactly that by putting things out on CWR. Both him and Neil are being very quiet.

They both need grilling about this. @CJ_covblaze also as he met them and referenced it?

HuckerbyDublinWhelan · Jan 4, 2020

Lol lies Reid and James Alexander are up and running.

no need to get into arguments with them. Leave them to it and ignore them.

they keep playing the past blame game - not going forward

Nick · Jan 4, 2020

HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Lol lies Reid and James Alexander are up and running.

no need to get into arguments with them. Leave them to it and ignore them.

they keep playing the past blame game - not going forward

Can tell there's something in it when all the accounts come out

Brighton Sky Blue · Jan 4, 2020

HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Lol lies Reid and James Alexander are up and running.

no need to get into arguments with them. Leave them to it and ignore them.

they keep playing the past blame game - not going forward

He spends so much time cropping G’s head on random objects he should write a Valentines card

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 4, 2020

HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Lol lies Reid and James Alexander are up and running.

no need to get into arguments with them. Leave them to it and ignore them.

they keep playing the past blame game - not going forward

That was the one bit I was pleased with. I don’t care about the past or history or who is to blame. Don’t host the show on the local radio station and lambast the club after a 4-1 win away about not playing in Birmingham and that they should sort it out when you know there is nothing they can currently do. That’s what needed calling out

Brighton Sky Blue · Jan 4, 2020

Sky Blue Pete said:
That was the one bit I was pleased with. I don’t care about the past or history or who is to blame. Don’t host the show on the local radio station and lambast the club after a 4-1 win away about not playing in Birmingham and that they should sort it out when you know there is nothing they can currently do. That’s what needed calling out

Think that even Eastwood has said before that he knows Boddy can’t do jack about it. Mind you he also said he understood why SISU were pursuing the legals and had no issue with it. Then a few years later it became a problem...

tisza · Jan 4, 2020

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Think that even Eastwood has said before that he knows Boddy can’t do jack about it. Mind you he also said he understood why SISU were pursuing the legals and had no issue with it. Then a few years later it became a problem...

If the EU commission thing went SISU's way obviously the Council & Wasps would then take it to the EU courts. Too much money involved for all sides just to walk away from.

chiefdave · Jan 4, 2020

Think we can safely rule out any notation that the indemnification was never requested by Wasps. They simply wouldn't have allowed the club to make statements placing the blame on them without responding if it wasn't true.

So from the basis that it did once exist you've only got two options. It still does exist and Linnell has got it very wrong, in which case he needs to make that clear on air. Or something has changed and it no longer exists, that's a simple yes / no question for our local media to put to Wasps.

Have to say I would find it very strange for Wasps to have removed the requirement but kept it secret.

eastwoodsdustman · Jan 4, 2020

HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
If there wasn’t an indemnity clause, I’m sure this would have been made public.
After all, if there isn’t - we move onto SISUp

Maybe that what they were hoping for. Everyone to fly off half cocked at sisu again. Deflection tactic.

Brighton Sky Blue · Jan 4, 2020

tisza said:
If the EU commission thing went SISU's way obviously the Council & Wasps would then take it to the EU courts. Too much money involved for all sides just to walk away from.

Didn't he realise that was a possibility when he said what he did?

SlowerThanPlatt · Jan 4, 2020

Nice one Pete. Just had a listen and you came across well

tisza · Jan 4, 2020

Brighton Sky Blue said:
Didn't he realise that was a possibility when he said what he did?

maybe he was keeping his options open in case it went against them?

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 4, 2020

Most likely incompetence that Clive will clarify on Sunday

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 4, 2020

6 years ago today I went to my one and only wasps game glad I didn’t get any bug

SlowerThanPlatt · Jan 4, 2020

Frostie said:
They have very few anyway, they actively chase people who post on social media & ask them to call up.

Yeah, either they’re filtering through who’s opinions they want or like you say there’s few anyway

SlowerThanPlatt · Jan 4, 2020

Didn’t Linnell come on here a years ago and did some Q&A as if he was some celebrity?

Moff · Jan 4, 2020

SlowerThanPlatt said:
Didn’t Linnell come on here a years ago and did some Q&A as if he was some celebrity?

Linnell believes his own press, that he is a cut above the rest of us fans who are just plebs, and he is the font of all knowledge. He cant quite grasp that even though he is a journalist that some people may know more or be able to express an alternative point, as well, or better than him

The bloke is a grade A bell end. Have never liked him since he was commentating on an Fa Cup loss away to Norwich in the mid 80's I think it was. He absolutely slated Oggy, it was unfair and over the top, and it led to Oggys wife ringing in to defend her husband as she was so upset and angry at Linnells words. As per normal Linnell tried to snake out of it.

shmmeee · Jan 4, 2020

chiefdave said:
Think we can safely rule out any notation that the indemnification was never requested by Wasps. They simply wouldn't have allowed the club to make statements placing the blame on them without responding if it wasn't true.

So from the basis that it did once exist you've only got two options. It still does exist and Linnell has got it very wrong, in which case he needs to make that clear on air. Or something has changed and it no longer exists, that's a simple yes / no question for our local media to put to Wasps.

Have to say I would find it very strange for Wasps to have removed the requirement but kept it secret.

It’s the clutchiest of straws but I’m hoping there’s just been some massive misunderstanding between the two.

As from the start we need all of them in a room being asked questions by a competent person. Good luck getting that though. One party always seems to pull out or we have an interviewer like Clive Eakin asking questions.

Needs someone who isn’t aggressive towards either side to do some non partisan digging and put it all out there for people to make their mind up.

Nick · Jan 4, 2020

SlowerThanPlatt said:
Didn’t Linnell come on here a years ago and did some Q&A as if he was some celebrity?

Nah he had a meltdown because there was a thread on here saying he was talking shit.

shmmeee · Jan 4, 2020

Frostie said:
They have very few anyway, they actively chase people who post on social media & ask them to call up.

I got the impression they just have five people on speed dial, Juggy twice.

shmmeee · Jan 4, 2020

Let’s all ring in this Friday on the point about the indemnity clause. Just a simple question everyone repeats until it’s taken. Pretend we want to talk about something else if it helps.

“Have Wasps asked the club to indemnify any losses? If so wouldn’t this bankrupt the club?”

If he says no, tell him that’s the sticking point and is he saying Boddy is lying. Calm, rational, not pissed or waffling or anything. Might work?

fernandopartridge · Jan 4, 2020

I think would be good also to discuss the reasonableness of the indemnity in the first place

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 4, 2020

shmmeee said:
It’s the clutchiest of straws but I’m hoping there’s just been some massive misunderstanding between the two.

As from the start we need all of them in a room being asked questions by a competent person. Good luck getting that though. One party always seems to pull out or we have an interviewer like Clive Eakin asking questions.

Needs someone who isn’t aggressive towards either side to do some non partisan digging and put it all out there for people to make their mind up.

Down to the dean again

MalcSB · Jan 4, 2020

fernandopartridge said:
I think would be good also to discuss the reasonableness of the indemnity in the first place

Wouldn’t that be a waste of time, it simply isn’t reasonable.

shmmeee · Jan 4, 2020

fernandopartridge said:
I think would be good also to discuss the reasonableness of the indemnity in the first place

It’s entirely unreasonable. No way could anyone accept it if it’s what CCFC have said. Asking Sisu to drop the legals is also unreasonable at this stage. Though asking for no more is fair enough at this point as it’s clearly vexatious.

All I want is an interview with Eastwood clarifying what it is with follow up questions about its reasonableness and the fact the current action can’t be withdrawn.

If Wasps are saying basically we can’t come back until the EC action is finished then let them own that.

fernandopartridge · Jan 4, 2020

MalcSB said:
Wouldn’t that be a waste of time, it simply isn’t reasonable.

I know it isn't but I don't think the general public look at it that way, it's seen that any remedy the EC imposes somehow is SISU's fault

Nick · Jan 4, 2020

shmmeee said:
It’s entirely unreasonable. No way could anyone accept it if it’s what CCFC have said. Asking Sisu to drop the legals is also unreasonable at this stage. Though asking for no more is fair enough at this point as it’s clearly vexatious.

All I want is an interview with Eastwood clarifying what it is with follow up questions about its reasonableness and the fact the current action can’t be withdrawn.

If Wasps are saying basically we can’t come back until the EC action is finished then let them own that.

So what did the trust ask him when they met him on behalf of fans also??

shmmeee · Jan 4, 2020

Sky Blue Pete said:
Down to the dean again

?

shmmeee · Jan 4, 2020

Nick said:
So what did the trust ask him when they met him on behalf of fans also??

I don’t know mate. I don’t have the encyclopaedic knowledge of everything everyone has done you have. I’m not the trust. What’s the point in this?

Trust are shit. Media is shit. OK what do we do in that scenario.

This is like discussing the Labour leadership and everyone wants to talk about centrists and the media instead of where to go from here.

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 4, 2020

shmmeee said:
It’s entirely unreasonable. No way could anyone accept it if it’s what CCFC have said. Asking Sisu to drop the legals is also unreasonable at this stage. Though asking for no more is fair enough at this point as it’s clearly vexatious.

All I want is an interview with Eastwood clarifying what it is with follow up questions about its reasonableness and the fact the current action can’t be withdrawn.

If Wasps are saying basically we can’t come back until the EC action is finished then let them own that.

Yep I agree that’s very clear.

Sky Blue Pete · Jan 4, 2020

shmmeee said:
?

Dean Witcombe to get them round the table again

Nick · Jan 4, 2020

shmmeee said:
I don’t know mate. I don’t have the encyclopaedic knowledge of everything everyone has done you have. I’m not the trust. What’s the point in this?

Trust are shit. Media is shit. OK what do we do in that scenario.

This is like discussing the Labour leadership and everyone wants to talk about centrists and the media instead of where to go from here.

I didn't mean you were the trust but surely they are withholding information from fans.

What's the point? They met with wasps and apparently asked these questions, what was said? They have some answers to these questions.

OffenhamSkyBlue · Jan 4, 2020

Nick said:
So what did the trust ask him when they met him on behalf of fans also??

They won’t reply to our tweets on that score

shmmeee · Jan 4, 2020

Nick said:
I didn't mean you were the trust but surely they are withholding information from fans.

What's the point? They met with wasps and apparently asked these questions, what was said? They have some answers to these questions.

Sorry. Having a nightmare day and am a bit on edge.

I think the trust are a busted flush. They’ve pissed Sisu off too much and frankly are pretty childish. I’d rather bypass them.

Nick · Jan 4, 2020

shmmeee said:
Sorry. Having a nightmare day and am a bit on edge.

I think the trust are a busted flush. They’ve pissed Sisu off too much and frankly are pretty childish. I’d rather bypass them.

Even so, they have some of the answers we are after. They met with wasps and apparently questioned them about it recently.

CWR (10 Viewers)

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency