CWR (2 Viewers)

[Grendel]

I’m sure people don’t need him to make up their minds for them.

He spouts utter bollocks as does @coventry_views

 

---

[SlowerThanPlatt]

I know that the point of his account is set up to save the club - if everyone followed his advice of not attending games at St.Andrews there simply wouldn’t be a club or not much of one anyway

 

[Grendel]

I know that the point of his account is set up to save the club - if everyone followed his advice of not attending games at St.Andrews there simply wouldn’t be a club or not much of one anyway

He’s an imbecile

 

[Nick]

Andy Turner is still spinning the shit out of "We aren't coming back to the Ricoh" even though nobody actually said we were.

 

[HuckerbyDublinWhelan]

PSB_Group should be banned from twitter - the guy is a tool. Unfortunately everyone plays up to him.

ive has arguments with him over ticket prices. Has he ever commented on the indemnity clause?

 

[SkyBlueCRJ]

Andy Turner is still spinning the shit out of "We aren't coming back to the Ricoh" even though nobody actually said we were.

These are becoming beyond pathetic. Andy Turner is literally reeling out the same story just reworded slightly on a weekly basis now.

 

[Adge]

Andy Turner is still spinning the shit out of "We aren't coming back to the Ricoh" even though nobody actually said we were.

Has he said “5 reasons why” we’re not?

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Emailed Rupert Lowe again today please be encouraged to do the same

[email protected]

asking whether the complaint can be ignored, how long till a decision made on whether there is a case to answer and does our leaving the Eu mean the complaint has no basis

 

[Adge]

Can someone please respond to Neil White as he’s just phoned in to the Radio CWR?

 

[Nick]

Can someone please respond to Neil White as he’s just phoned in to the Radio CWR?

What saying

 

[mr_monkey]

What saying

I guess a follow up to his insane statement in the telegraph

 

[Adge]

The usual spiel that we’ve all heard. “We are normal fans and have 2000 odd members and want the club to be open/transparent blah blah blah”

 

[eastwoodsdustman]

This is just a coordinated backlash following petes opinion being voiced on cwr

 

[Nick]

This is just a coordinated backlash following petes opinion being voiced on cwr

Of course it is.

 

[Buster]

Isn't that the whole point? Getting as many of us on as possible to (a) monopolise the phone-in with the questions that need to be asked, and (b) make it look like Pete isn't just some random pro-SISU frother?
Well done all - i wonder how long Linnell and co can keep this up? Are they making sure Linnell does the phone-in, as Eakin would probably say something embarrassing?

That’s coordination

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

I’m confused at the statement. Boddy has said they are talking as wasps and ccfc and ccfc have put out a joint statement saying that they signed an agreement not to take any further legal action but can’t sign the indemnity clause. What does the trust want? I don’t understand

 

[SlowerThanPlatt]

I’m confused at the statement. Boddy has said they are talking as wasps and ccfc and ccfc have put out a joint statement saying that they signed an agreement not to take any further legal action but can’t sign the indemnity clause. What does the trust want? I don’t understand

Whatever the other parties want them to say

 

[Nick]

I’m confused at the statement. Boddy has said they are talking as wasps and ccfc and ccfc have put out a joint statement saying that they signed an agreement not to take any further legal action but can’t sign the indemnity clause. What does the trust want? I don’t understand

They want to distract and mislead away from the indemnity clause.

 

[chiefdave]

The usual spiel that we’ve all heard. “We are normal fans and have 2000 odd members and want the club to be open/transparent blah blah blah”

What a joke. Refuse to tell their own members what they are up to and what happens in their meetings but demands transparency from others.

This is just a coordinated backlash following petes opinion being voiced on cwr

Spot on. Couple of calls to CWR questioning Wasps and we've seen the social media accounts fire up and now the Trust.

Was only a few days again Neil was saying they were too busy to issue statements, that it would need to be their full time job for them to do that.

 

[chiefdave]

What does the trust want? I don’t understand

They want their to be no criticism of Wasps or the council. What effect that has on the club doesn't bother them in the slightest.

 

[RoboCCFC90]

The usual spiel that we’ve all heard. “We are normal fans and have 2000 odd members and want the club to be open/transparent blah blah blah”

Wasn’t it 4,000 members at one point?

 

[Nick]

What a joke. Refuse to tell their own members what they are up to and what happens in their meetings but demands transparency from others.

Spot on. Couple of calls to CWR questioning Wasps and we've seen the social media accounts fire up and now the Trust.

Was only a few days again Neil was saying they were too busy to issue statements, that it would need to be their full time job for them to do that.

The irony is hilarious.

 

[ccfctommy]

How many phone ins does this station have?

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

How many phone ins does this station have?

After games and Monday and Friday

now I’m on it there’s no way I’m letting Stuart off the hook about Eu complaint being kicked and the indemnity clause. I’m happy that there comes a time to push boddy but now is not that time

 

[Paul Anthony]

They want to distract and mislead away from the indemnity clause.

Exactly. Classic distraction techniques the kind of which are used in politics every day of the week. When something's going on that you want to divert people's attention away from, this is exactly the kind of game to play.

Trouble is people buy it.

 

[Nick]

Looks as if the Trust are going to get caught out again.

 

[SkyBlueZack]

Looks as if the Trust are going to get caught out again.

I seen him questioning someone on Facebook but the person was deleting their comments so not sure what he was saying.

 

[shmmeee]

Emailed Rupert Lowe again today please be encouraged to do the same

[email protected]

asking whether the complaint can be ignored, how long till a decision made on whether there is a case to answer and does our leaving the Eu mean the complaint has no basis

Cant answer the first, expect the answer to the second to be “usually takes between six months and two years, we will not be told until it happens” or similar. Third is entirely dependent on the deal we strike this year from what I understand. As potential breach was while we were in the EU I don’t think that matters but who enforces the decision I think will depend on what we agree this year. That’s how I parsed the article I read on it. Fact is no one really knows because no one has left before.

 

[Sky Blue Pete]

Cant answer the first, expect the answer to the second to be “usually takes between six months and two years, we will not be told until it happens” or similar. Third is entirely dependent on the deal we strike this year from what I understand. As potential breach was while we were in the EU I don’t think that matters but who enforces the decision I think will depend on what we agree this year. That’s how I parsed the article I read on it. Fact is no one really knows because no one has left before.

Yep

 

[Warwickhunt]

The EU sees all things as a breach of a level playing field and will follow it to its death whether we are in or out of Europe, most of the trade deal from EU will be to ensure a level playing field as they will not like competition