So Evans is planted to break it up? Sounds like something from a Will Ferrell filmWonder who it was only a few knew an offer had gone in.
Who has the most to gain from this I wonder?
Trying to break the consortium up with these leaks and other mind games.
Hoffman confirmed he’s “got the money” hasn’t he?
Because they can't drag it out if they just rule it out and disprove it.Hoffman confirmed he has seen something that says that Dale has some wealth (I believe) then he welcomed him to the consortium and said nothing would happen till the legal action has finished.
I have no idea what that wealth
All of a sudden Dale is messaging again about it been a done deal again.
So if the CET are going to run a story why don’t they actually investigate it.
Why don’t they either expose that Dale has got the sort of money for it to be a done deal .
Or
Confirm that he has
Either way I don’t personally like the way Dale is conducting himself.
They interviewed him last week. They didn't do any of it or ask anything, just let him contradict
Well that's what they want.That’s what bothers me. That’s not investigative journalism. It’s lazy and ensures they get lots of hits
That's what their job depends on though.That’s what bothers me. That’s not investigative journalism. It’s lazy and ensures they get lots of hits
Nor has Hoffman. The jury is still out.
On you however.......
Personally I don't think he needs to apologise, bawtry. Clear as day to anyone that, that wasn't racist. I just think it is too ludicrous to warrant an apology.Riyadh, you have always come across as a decent poster making constructive comments and being a "fair and reasonable" guy
You are bang out of order calling Nick racist and should apologise. He is not perfect for sure , like the rest of us , but most definitely he is not a racist. He and the rest of the posters on here do not accept racism, homophobic comments, sexism , glorification of holiganism etc.
Also, you most concide that Evans has gone about this whole saga in a very strange way and nobody can believe what he says because on at least 5 occasions his words have been proved to be completely fabricated.
Personally I don't think he needs to apologise, bawtry. Clear as day to anyone that, that wasn't racist. I just think it is too ludicrous to warrant an apology.
It's so akin to my saying I don't like blackboards to my daughter. She immediately called me a racist (jokingly obviously).
Yeah, fair enough. I just don't think Nick is particularly outraged. I think he just finds the whole thing bafflingly amusing.Disagree Otis. For me calling somebody a racist in 2017 is a personal slu ( unless they are, of course)
I totally agree that to link Nicks Nigeria comments to racism is ludicrous, but that misses the point.
It's pathetic that we are actually discussing it but I feel strongly about personal derogatory comments. I am not a prolific poster on here but read most days and chip in now and again. I don't hide behind a key board, most people either no of me or can very easily find out who I am by posts I have made over the years. In fact I make no secret of it and will look anybody on here straight in the eye.
Perhaps I am old fashioned when it comes to social media ( I am not on Facebook or twitter etc ) but you should post responsibilly and be held to task by your comments or posts.
Rant over and PUSB.
Yeah, fair enough. I just don't think Nick is particularly outraged. I think he just finds the whole thing bafflingly amusing.
Was just getting my hair cut.Haha. Yes agree but still not the point.
Mind you, Nick might be having counciling or PTSD for all we know
Haha. Yes agree but still not the point.
Mind you, Nick might be having counciling or PTSD for all we know
I took it for 'Patently true says Dale.'pre takeover simpletons delirious?
If nothing else, this Evans palavar is making Hoffman look the consumate professional.
It even makes Byng look professional!If nothing else, this Evans palavar is making Hoffman look the consumate professional.
Personally I believe this is now damaging the credibility of any future bid the Hoffman team may do in the eyes of the Public.
I agree, but more importantly, there's a chance it is damaging the Hoffman team in the eyes of sisu.
Thank you for your considered posts Bawtryneal.Disagree Otis. For me calling somebody a racist in 2017 is a personal slur (unless they are, of course)
I totally agree that to link Nicks Nigeria comments to racism is ludicrous, but that misses the point.
It's pathetic that we are actually discussing it but I feel strongly about personal derogatory comments. I am not a prolific poster on here but read most days and chip in now and again. I don't hide behind a key board, most people either know of me or can very easily find out who I am by posts I have made over the years. In fact I make no secret of it and will look anybody on here straight in the eye.
Perhaps I am old fashioned when it comes to social media ( I am not on Facebook or twitter etc ) but you should post responsibilly and be held to task by your comments or posts.
Rant over and PUSB.
Thank you for your considered posts Bawtryneal.
I value your opinion and stayed away from this subject for a week until I was called out again for supporting Dale Evans.
For what it is worth I do think Nick's comments were ill thought out regarding Nigerians and credit card fraud.
Now do I really believe Nick is a racist, no I don't and for what it's worth nor does my black wife think of it as a slur, she is used to such stereotypical comments from people who mean no harm but at best it is insensitive and is best left in the past like the black and white minstrels, love thy neighbour and Jim Davidson.
I am not going to give oxygen to this subject anymore but state that giving someone the benefit of the doubt is not the same as believing them and taking a stand about that is something I will not be apologizing for.
Differences of opinion is what a forum is about and a shared love of Coventry City is what brings us here. I will join the others in kicking Dale Evans when we are certain he is is what many suspect.
Bawtryneal, I am a long time supporter who is late to this social media lark and like you I will look anybody in the eye and state my case.
Your backing of Nick does you and others credit, as you know him, certainly better than you know me and I value loyalty as a really positive trait, just as I value not jumping to conclusions.
In a post a while ago, I said about "Headed paper". Has anyone actually read the piece about the "Hoffman" interview? SISU state "No contact between themselves and Dale Evans" Yet nothing being admitted or denied of any further offer from Hoffman by SISU or Hoffman himself.
The consortium need Evans' money (if he really has some). I'm not sure how they could stop him from shooting his mouth off, but if he's in the consortium, they have to find a way.I think it's now common knowledge that there has been some contact between Hoffmans consortium and sisu.
This evans fella has just muddied the waters with his nonsense.
After the initial story of the consortiums bid broke on Facebook there was a concerted effort to keep things out of the media after that which is why I can't believe Hoffman is allowing someone who is behaving like evans to have any involvement.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?