He was superb against Swansea too, although he faded due to lack of match fitness. Today he was better. More to the point, it illustrated that he is a midfielder rather than a winger, and he started off in CM at Rushden. He's not that fast, but he has great distribution and touch. Not to mention a brain-the ball to Sheff for the goal being the best example, although one cross-field ball to Clarke was even better.
The key to the performances of him and McSheffrey is the formation and shape. Thorn knows they both lack a yard of pace and are not at their best in defensive roles. McSheffrey in the free role moving into the channels at will does, ( along with young, quick full-backs in Hussey & Clarke ) provide width, stretches the play, and gives our ballplayers moving targets. Hussey and McSheffrey in particular were a nightmare to pick up for their defence, constantly finding space, and I thought Clarke did the same until his knock. The way Keogh also attacked, it was like having 2 over-lapping right-backs in the first half!
Bell is also suddenly receiving the ball with play and movement in front of him-as is Sammy. They both made their names doing just that in passing, attacking teams. The 442 diamond is very difficult to defend against, and certainly more stretching than a 442 with long balls up to a target man! We outnumbered them in midfield, and the movement meant we always over-loaded their defence. King had a relatively quiet game and Freddy was looking lazy, yet we still threatened constantly. And Lukas tore them to shreds with the graft, power and mobility he added. Not to mention the Whelan-esque finish
Yes, it's just one game, but I entirely buy into this formation and style of play-one that gets the best out of players available, and uses their attributes to the maximum. One that attacks, and plays "pass-and-move" football. We'll lose plenty playing that attacking brand for sure, but boy is it more entertaining! I haven't enjoyed a game that much since Eric Black. 6-1 against Scunthorpe, anyone?!