Nick
Administrator
Or we are paying him more.
Or we are paying him more.I think that, and you think that, but he obviously thinks otherwise!
Maybe I misread, I just presumed he turned down a loan rather than a permanent move so his pay would remain the same,Or we are paying him more.
Good!Well this is boring ain’t it
Wouldn’t mind us shipping out Walker or Kane to make way for a centre half and centre midGood!
We have strengthened one area with Palmer but the rest looks pretty poor on the face of it. At least Doyle looked like he had a bit about himSold our best defender and people are still happy with us not replacing him and not strengthening any other part of our team. Horrendous window
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Sold our best defender and people are still happy with us not replacing him and not strengthening any other part of our team. Horrendous window
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
Wouldn’t mind us shipping out Walker or Kane to make way for a centre half and centre mid
Which is just a ridiculous situation. Stagnating in this league means going backwards. It was clear from about December last season the team needed a freshen upSeems like no more first teamers departing is the best we can expect.
Just gotta hope one of them is headed to covBBC transfer gossip days there are a number of players at various club's who are negotiating pay offs so they become free agents before he deadline
Which is just a ridiculous situation. Stagnating in this league means going backwards. It was clear from about December last season the team needed a freshen up
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
SisuCan someone please explain in simple terms why teams like Luton and Birmingham who have smaller crowds than us, stadiums to maintain are able to spend money on transfers offering better wages than ourselves whos owners insist on them selling players that will weaken their first team
Can someone please explain in simple terms why teams like Luton and Birmingham who have smaller crowds than us, stadiums to maintain are able to spend money on transfers offering better wages than ourselves whos owners dont insist on them selling players that will weaken their first team
Can someone please explain in simple terms why teams like Luton and Birmingham who have smaller crowds than us, stadiums to maintain are able to spend money on transfers offering better wages than ourselves whos owners dont insist on them selling players that will weaken their first team
Where are the fans defending the sisu model nowTrust the model
Luton is absolutely not a trendy place to liveBrum and Luton are trendy places to live, whilst Coventry is considered to be a bit of a dump.
Plus good chance you'll do your achilles on our pitch.
BBC transfer gossip days there are a number of players at various club's who are negotiating pay offs so they become free agents before he deadline
Yeah as long as they become free agents before the window closesAm I right in saying we can still sign free agents after this window? If so it’s a case of biding our time and waiting for free agents to get desperate enough to sign and give us some back up.
SBB and BD have been awfully quiet tonight.
It really is a great way to run the club. What a model it isAm I right in saying we can still sign free agents after this window? If so it’s a case of biding our time and waiting for free agents to get desperate enough to sign and give us some back up.
SBB and BD have been awfully quiet tonight.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?