Yes they told us so when have they every not been transparent before?
Is it that you can't read or don't want to read?
It's interesting that people are asking to hear the council side of things.
All we have heard for the last 2 years via the PR company is the council side of things and SISU's story really hasn't changed that much
I think there is more to come if it gets to the JR and the council will be shown in even more of a bad light
It's Chris west rather than the council and as has been said there are toe sides to what happened.
I'm far more interested in questioning the club about the current finances and playing next season in Coventry than I am about whether the council played the business game better than sisu
Remember js has no interest in football and is only interested in purchasing the Ricoh arena complex
It's council officers rather than the council
Of course, they're all just wildcards who go off and do their own thing.
It's interesting that people are asking to hear the council side of things.
All we have heard for the last 2 years via the PR company is the council side of things and SISU's story really hasn't changed that much
I think there is more to come if it gets to the JR and the council will be shown in even more of a bad light
Of course, they're all just wildcards who go off and do their own thing.
Considering I've seen people seriously argue that Joy Seppala has no involvement in running the club, I think it's fair to ask for accuracy on both sides.
Considering I've seen people seriously argue that Joy Seppala has no involvement in running the club, I think it's fair to ask for accuracy on both sides.
SISU's story has stayed the same for 2 years.
Except we now know that despite been hands on with all decisions now and in contact daily. Joy knew nothing about the rent strike.
We know that Joy offered 2 million to a charity for something of no value. Because they are a charity.
Their story has changed and i now think Joy is great
I would prefer to listen to both sides and not only one side where a lot of what they have told us in the past is suspect at least.
No SISU's story has stayed the same for 2 years.
Except we know know that despite been hands on with all decisions now and in contact daily. Joy knew nothing about the rent strike.
We now that Joy offered 2 million to a charity for something if no value. Because they ate a charity.
Their story has changed u know think she us great
Let's not forget that it's all about the rent.
Trust Q&A said:7: Is the rent at £400k in League 1 acceptable ?
ACL: Yes
CCFC: Yes
Nothing wrong with that as an approach, have a like
There does seem to be a lot of justifying of positions going around however when really... the questions need to be asked.
The same as the Trust's questions to SISU about accounts are perfectly fair, open, and give a chance for SISU to reassure if thy choose to take it, I'd kind of like similar questions asked about some of the correspondence.
As opposed to answering it and justifying it autmatically because of who said it.
Seems reasonable.
What questions would you put to the council?
To be honest I would want a management company based in my town to run it rather than some mysterious offshore company that has proven to be incompetent.
The fact that it is a council as well gives me a feeling of security and I am willing to put up with its inefficiencies in the hope that any future profits will go into the public purse.
From what i believe ACL and the council will be invited. Whether they turn up or not is up to them
Seems reasonable.
What questions would you put to the council?
Why would they invite and why would we need or even want the council/ACL at a forum discussing the financial state and recent accounts of our club? If we need something explained then OSB58 understands all this financial stuff.
OSB58 has been missing in action since Thursday night i think.
OSB58 has been missing in action since Thursday night i think.
Hilarious how easy it is for the spin to work.
I know. You and Astute have been in overdrive since the court documents were released.
I know. You and Astute have been in overdrive since the court documents were released.
tbf to Astute, the posts I've read recently (and there have been too many to do owt but skim!) he's actually been reigning in a little, and looking at other angles while considering council culpability as a possibility, so maybe a little harsh on him in this instance
To be fair to Astute, he's spinning like a top and he's not sure yet where he's going to stop.
Pots and kettles there friend, or has the irony top spun out of conrol?
Not using spinning in the PR sense, merely in confusion.
I'm not spinning for anybody, but a bit of light shone in all dark corners never does any harm.
I know. You and Astute have been in overdrive since the court documents were released.
Maybe initially. Reverted to type now by the looks of it.
OSB58 has been missing in action since Thursday night i think.
It's Chris west rather than the council and as has been said there are toe sides to what happened.
TBF - I think this is about the busiest season for auditors.
TBF - I think this is about the busiest season for auditors.
And most of them employed by SISU if the court case the other day is anything to go by.
You mean like - it's Mark Labovich rather than sisu?
I just learned something new today.
I always thought lawyers and auditors were completely different animals doing different stuff and that.
8 lawyers/QC's instead of 1 or two. Will need auditors to check the finances now. And why bother with 1 or 2
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?