You should remember, we support the TEAM not the OWNERS, whoever they are PUSB!!!!
I support Coventry, not Walsall.
You should remember, we support the TEAM not the OWNERS, whoever they are PUSB!!!!
You should remember, we support the TEAM not the OWNERS, whoever they are PUSB!!!!
I support Coventry, not Walsall.
We quite obviously aren't moving to Walsall, I'd bet on CCFC staying at the RICOH - whoever is owner.
Really?
So when Fisher stated many times in public that we would never play at the Ricoh again, you knew he was lying at that time, just as you are calling him a liar now?
RFC you have to boycott games now its the only option now. Any fan who attends games from now on or buys merchandise is contributing to the death of CCFC.
If we play at the Ricoh how can any fan who attends games be contributing to the death of CCFC?
Surely the opposite. If no fans attend there may will be no club.
Boycott the move away, sure. Understand that fully. But to boycott games played by Coventry City in Coventry at the Ricoh just seems totally self-defeating.
We quite obviously aren't moving to Walsall, I'd bet on CCFC staying at the RICOH - whoever is owner.
You should remember, we support the TEAM not the OWNERS, whoever they are PUSB!!!!
With sisu now in full control we have had it and yes I am back to moan we all need to boycott its just a joke
If we play at the Ricoh how can any fan who attends games be contributing to the death of CCFC?
Surely the opposite. If no fans attend there may will be no club.
Boycott the move away, sure. Understand that fully. But to boycott games played by Coventry City in Coventry at the Ricoh just seems totally self-defeating.
If we play at the Ricoh how can any fan who attends games be contributing to the death of CCFC?
Surely the opposite. If no fans attend there may will be no club.
Boycott the move away, sure. Understand that fully. But to boycott games played by Coventry City in Coventry at the Ricoh just seems totally self-defeating.
I thought the idea was to boycott a groundshare and building a new ground.The main issue was staying at the ricoh, with sisu or without ?
That is why we had a Wimbledon supporter at the march yesterday he said it is a carbon copy to what happened to them?
LAST, good example if he said that. Shows that while the corporates can do what they please, a phoenix club can rise IF people support them.
To be honest, as much as I hope we don't end up being liquidated, starting again would give a fresh start and the club could be run sustainably.
Also, we get liquidated and start way down the leagues there will be no way we'll be playing at the Ricoh anyway and would then still have to find a groundshare.
Defeats the whole object surely?
If we play at the Ricoh how can any fan who attends games be contributing to the death of CCFC?
Surely the opposite. If no fans attend there may will be no club.
Boycott the move away, sure. Understand that fully. But to boycott games played by Coventry City in Coventry at the Ricoh just seems totally self-defeating.
Like what The Otis said.
Why?
Still think ACL would want a tam playing there.
Really?
So when Fisher stated many times in public that we would never play at the Ricoh again, you knew he was lying at that time, just as you are calling him a liar now?
That was the original idea, but has been hijacked by the A.B.S brigade.
If we're at the Ricoh, I along with 3 others will be there.
Strictly speaking not lying as he was referring to the old owners. Otium may adopt a different strategy.
It worked. Everybody was so convinced CCFC was carrying on as usual, including a plan that didn't require the Ricoh, that they only put in token bids just in case SISU didn't.
Now its back to the Ricoh ....... Come on !!!!