skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
It's a shame sisu can't accept that and are going to keep the misery that is further litigation going. Still, the fans come first.
According to the law - the Council acted properly and did nothing wrong at all.
This is the same law that deemed last years admin process legal also meaning in the same way that Appleton did nothing wrong at all.
If we are going to approach it from that point of view then it should be done consistently.
According to the law - the Council acted properly and did nothing wrong at all.
This is the same law that deemed last years admin process legal also meaning in the same way that Appleton did nothing wrong at all.
If we are going to approach it from that point of view then it should be done consistently.
So when SISU test the legal process and fail they are derided - and rightly so.
When ACL reject a CVA - costing the club 10pts, say they're going to challenge a 'legal process' but actually do absolutely nothing - they are justified in doing so?
That makes no sense whatsoever.
So when SISU test the legal process and fail they are derided - and rightly so.
When ACL reject a CVA - costing the club 10pts, say they're going to challenge a 'legal process' but actually do absolutely nothing - they are justified in doing so?
That makes no sense whatsoever.
According to the law - the Council acted properly and did nothing wrong at all.
This is the same law that deemed last years admin process legal also meaning in the same way that Appleton did nothing wrong at all.
If we are going to approach it from that point of view then it should be done consistently.
So when SISU test the legal process and fail they are derided - and rightly so.
When ACL reject a CVA - costing the club 10pts, say they're going to challenge a 'legal process' but actually do absolutely nothing - they are justified in doing so?
That makes no sense whatsoever.
It is odd to say the least that there is currently so much happiness on this forum with regards to the JR. It seems that some believe that a victory for CCC is also a victory for the fans. Is someone able to explain why this is the case? Why does a SISU defeat suddenly increase their chances of selling onto someone else?
We are no better off that before, yet there is open celebration. We are just another step towards the club not existing and some are happy?
Excellent comments. I think though sick boy we term it 'gloating' not celebrating. But, we do have a lt of very small minded people on here.
Excellent comments. I think though sick boy we term it 'gloating' not celebrating. But, we do have a lt of very small minded people on here.
Seems like you are scraping the barrel here on trying to make the process sound better for SISU again.
Do you really think that the judge wouldn't lay questions towards Appleton on the way he couldn't find the golden share or didn't notice that some of our players were registered with the wrong part of SISU?
Try to remember that the judge mentioned this part as SISU trying to get the Ricoh cheaply as part of plan A and not having a plan B. But it wasn't part of the JR into looking at what Appleton did.
Seems to me you are happy to deviate away from my point rather than answer it directly.
Asking questions is significantly different from something being illegal.
To this day no one has legally challenged to admin process - probably because there is nothing to challenge.
So I'll say again - the point of us losing 10pts was what exactly - from a legal point of view.
Seems to me you are happy to deviate away from my point rather than answer it directly.
Asking questions is significantly different from something being illegal.
To this day no one has legally challenged to admin process - probably because there is nothing to challenge.
So I'll say again - the point of us losing 10pts was what exactly - from a legal point of view.
Seems to me you are happy to deviate away from my point rather than answer it directly.
Asking questions is significantly different from something being illegal.
To this day no one has legally challenged to admin process - probably because there is nothing to challenge.
So I'll say again - the point of us losing 10pts was what exactly - from a legal point of view.
According to the law - the Council acted properly and did nothing wrong at all.
This is the same law that deemed last years admin process legal also meaning in the same way that Appleton did nothing wrong at all.
If we are going to approach it from that point of view then it should be done consistently.
It is odd to say the least that there is currently so much happiness on this forum with regards to the JR. It seems that some believe that a victory for CCC is also a victory for the fans. Is someone able to explain why this is the case? Why does a SISU defeat suddenly increase their chances of selling onto someone else?
We are no better off that before, yet there is open celebration. We are just another step towards the club not existing and some are happy?
If some who are celebrating which I have not seen and you obviously have... just maybe they are celebrating because they the tax payers won???
What I find disturbing is if the result was the other way.. you SISU sympathisers will be celebrating too.
Sick Boy has always been a Sisu apologist - even now - after such a damning assessment by a judge - he is unable to recognise that our owners have sought underhand tactics in order to get a public asset at a knockdown price rather than concentrate on running a club, building bridges with local community, fanbase, etc.
We all wish our owners knew that that is what running a football club is about. Sisu don't, never have and, sadly, never will.
Time to face facts that most have always understood. Ccfc may as well start over because the vast majority do not want a club that fails to recognise where its principle duty lies and that is to its fans.
You clearly haven't read much then.
One bloke even got some milk tray out.
The sensible amongst us however, made no pre-judgement and just waited for the outcome of the trial.
Always find it wise to not try and second guess and just wait for things to play out.
Pull up a chair and wait for the outcome is my motto.
Is this the -10 that would have got us promoted? Didn't think so.
No. They've been spent on another struggling company instead.Did they???
Well like I said it must have been a hard working CCC rate payer celebrating for the fact that some of his/her taxes has not been swallowed up by a dysfunctional hedge fund.
Fortunately majority of our CCFC fans do not suffer from Stockholm syndrome.
Surely we should all be glad the innocent party won?
Did they???
Well like I said it must have been a hard working CCC rate payer celebrating for the fact that some of his/her taxes has not been swallowed up by a dysfunctional hedge fund.
Fortunately majority of our CCFC fans do not suffer from Stockholm syndrome.
No. They've been spent on another struggling company instead.
Why is it that all rate/tax payers are hard-working?
Sure some are right lazy twats.
Why is it that all rate/tax payers are hard-working?
Sure some are right lazy twats.
Genuine question...On what evidence are ACL a 'struggling company' ?No. They've been spent on another struggling company instead.
Genuine question...On what evidence are ACL a 'struggling company' ?
Anything that makes sisu less likely getting the Ricoh is a win
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?