The Ricoh is not owned by SISU thus making them 'users'. I would say tenants but I don't believe they would be called that because they actualy only use the ground for 5 or 6 hours per week. So as 'users' of a ground do they have a legal ground to stand on in the issue of banning banners? They make the issue on the grounds of 'fire safety' but that can be met with a certificate, but the actual banning should come from the owners, surely? In our case it is the council. So if a protestor wants to take a banner to the ground he or she could get authorization if they apply to the council.
Therefore, if we follow that procedure SISU have no right to demand the banners removal because we have permission from the owners of the ground.
Therefore, if we follow that procedure SISU have no right to demand the banners removal because we have permission from the owners of the ground.