Do the numbers add up? (1 Viewer)

stupot07 said:

To be honest though, with a bespoke build that will likely require significant infrastructure changes, and also sensitivity with the earlsdon nimby's, you really need some political backing and council planning support (look at how much advice they gave wasps) to pull off a development like this. Regardless of whether the council have to follow procedure, they can make it very difficult, so I can understand why fisher thinks its a no go at the minute.

That said I don't believe they would build it anyway.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

Nick said:

Oh, so nothing to do with the telegraph sitting on Twitter all day trying to get in touch with ex players etc to make stories out of it?

Wasn't the Embargo he mentioned about the council etc, rather than the Telegraph or ex players?

Click to expand...

skybluetony176 said:

Trouble is it suits TF and our owners to say that there's a political embargo at the moment. If they really want to they can test the waters at any time by taking steps forward. Doesn't necessarily have to be a planning application, they could start some real consultation on it and involve the council and local residents as they have in Ryton. The difference is of course that they intend to have Ryton developed, hence they're falling over themselves to get things moving. When it comes to the BPA they're hiding behind excuses. Why is that? My guess is that they can't afford for it to get a good reception on many levels from having no intention and never have to developing the BPA as it's a hoax to if it does look likely they can't afford it anyway as they haven't got the backing.

One things for sure. When they do actually want to do something i.e. like develop Ryton, they can get a shift on. When suits.

Click to expand...

Captain Dart said:

Finally, none of this will ever happen, it is just posturing.

Click to expand...