Do You Believe that Some of the Wilson Money Will Be Reinvested in the Team? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Samo
- Start date
The gullible might also think that the good guys always win.
Nick
Administrator
Ay??????
W
westcountry_skyblue
Guest
If they do they had better get a move on.
only four weeks on saturday until kickoff.
I will guess at a few loanee strikers.
I really fear for us this season if we continue at Northampton.
Quite embarressing that they cannot behave like adults and get together.
only four weeks on saturday until kickoff.
I will guess at a few loanee strikers.
I really fear for us this season if we continue at Northampton.
Quite embarressing that they cannot behave like adults and get together.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Some, maybe but who knows what percentage. I also wouldn't be surprised if it's not until the January transfer window when they can gamble on spending the smallest amount possible to get us out the shit.
If we're doing well I wouldn't be surprised if a penny doesn't get spent at all.
I guess that's a yes and no then
If we're doing well I wouldn't be surprised if a penny doesn't get spent at all.
I guess that's a yes and no then
sky blue john
Well-Known Member
Yes but only to the extent of paying players wages. Day to day overheads. The fees will save Arvo putting any more money for a while.
skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
covmark
Well-Known Member
sky blue john
Well-Known Member
I should imagine even with our new signings our wage bill will be far lower this month compared to june.
Midfield General
New Member
Dark chocolate Hob Nobs...King of biscuits...
Astute
Well-Known Member
Spot on. Without player sales we would have been in a very bad place. The income from Northampton hardly covers anything. So player sales will have to cover the poor income whilst we are in Northampton or we will end up with a relegation squad.
Nick
Administrator
They are, with player sales!
ccfc92
Well-Known Member
I always took SISU covering losses as we wouldn't need to sell players to stay in the same position we are.
Surely the money coming in lately (Arsenal, LC, CW, Christie) should push us towards building the club?
[
Only if supporters turn-up to support the manager and our team HELP!
QUOTE=ccfc92;734856]I always took SISU covering losses as we wouldn't need to sell players to stay in the same position we are.
Surely the money coming in lately (Arsenal, LC, CW, Christie) should push us towards building the club?[/QUOTE]
Only if supporters turn-up to support the manager and our team HELP!
QUOTE=ccfc92;734856]I always took SISU covering losses as we wouldn't need to sell players to stay in the same position we are.
Surely the money coming in lately (Arsenal, LC, CW, Christie) should push us towards building the club?[/QUOTE]
kg82
Well-Known Member
[/QUOTE]
Did you really expect supporters to just up and follow unpopular owners who decided to play 35 miles away? Yes, there are lots of reasons why we're not playing at the Ricoh BUT, in the end, it was their decision to move us. Maybe the single worst thing to ever happen to this club. The one thing I want to do is support the team (bought my Bradford ticket today) but not in Northampton.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
You've all been taking quoting lessons off Sky Blue Kid!
Yeah the site has been riddled all day.
Sky Blue Pete
Well-Known Member
I don't think they will spend a transfer fee, they may fund wages from it. Gonna struggle more than last year in sixfields
Samo
Well-Known Member
We might find out in the next few days.
skybluepm2
Well-Known Member
I doubt any will be used for transfer fee's. Most of which will be for the 'running of the club' and 'funding the losses' for the inexcusable move to Shitfields. There isn't an ounce of decency in either Fishface nor Seppalla's bodies so for them to do something for the good of the club would be a miracle. It certainly hasn't happened thus far.
A more worrying issue is that our 1st friendly is this Saturday and we don't have a single striker at the fucking club! What happened to 'end of June' ' ducks in a row' 'we'll move quickly' bullshit? It's a farce. After that quick flurry of midfielders nothing has happened. Spend some money for crying out loud..Fishers plan of reaching the championship and beyond is cringeworthy. The guy seriously needs to be sectioned
A more worrying issue is that our 1st friendly is this Saturday and we don't have a single striker at the fucking club! What happened to 'end of June' ' ducks in a row' 'we'll move quickly' bullshit? It's a farce. After that quick flurry of midfielders nothing has happened. Spend some money for crying out loud..Fishers plan of reaching the championship and beyond is cringeworthy. The guy seriously needs to be sectioned
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
Of course some of it will be invested in the squad.
I think people need to read the statements from Waggott and Fisher carefully. The monies are being put in to the football business. Like many businesses the football business has many facets that require paying they include players wages, staff wages, utilities, overheads and loan interest. A football business is not just about ticket income it also includes the buying and selling of players.
What the incomes from the sale of Wilson & Christie do is to provide a budget within SMCP that the club works to. The Arsenal and Clarke money was in the previous years budget. Had there been no sale of Wilson in particular then I suspect the player budget would have been less than £1m (unless SISU put more money in by way of gift or shares). Had he not been sold then we would have been relying on the academy next season. As it is if you look at the 15 or so first team players we have listed most fall within SMCP so it could be argued the Wilson sale was always going to happen in order to provide a budget, avoid an embargo and to not be an academy team out of its depth in L1
As for "invested" it depends what your definition of investment is. I suspect the average football fan sees that as buying players in. What the Wilson sale does really is pay the wages and bills which allows the club to breakeven whilst at Sixfields - is that really "investing" in the team? To have a business at all there has to be players capable of playing in L1 - guess we wait see if we have that.
To my mind the Wilson money etc basically helps pay the bills - which includes players wages. So yes it will be "invested" in the team at least in part but I don't think it is an investment in building more an investment in survival
I think people need to read the statements from Waggott and Fisher carefully. The monies are being put in to the football business. Like many businesses the football business has many facets that require paying they include players wages, staff wages, utilities, overheads and loan interest. A football business is not just about ticket income it also includes the buying and selling of players.
What the incomes from the sale of Wilson & Christie do is to provide a budget within SMCP that the club works to. The Arsenal and Clarke money was in the previous years budget. Had there been no sale of Wilson in particular then I suspect the player budget would have been less than £1m (unless SISU put more money in by way of gift or shares). Had he not been sold then we would have been relying on the academy next season. As it is if you look at the 15 or so first team players we have listed most fall within SMCP so it could be argued the Wilson sale was always going to happen in order to provide a budget, avoid an embargo and to not be an academy team out of its depth in L1
As for "invested" it depends what your definition of investment is. I suspect the average football fan sees that as buying players in. What the Wilson sale does really is pay the wages and bills which allows the club to breakeven whilst at Sixfields - is that really "investing" in the team? To have a business at all there has to be players capable of playing in L1 - guess we wait see if we have that.
To my mind the Wilson money etc basically helps pay the bills - which includes players wages. So yes it will be "invested" in the team at least in part but I don't think it is an investment in building more an investment in survival
oldskyblue58
CCFC Finance Director
Question
If the sale of Wilson was crucial to having any sort of budget and helps SISU sit tight at Sixfields for the next 12 months with the business breaking even ...... when exactly was the decision taken to sell him? :thinking about:
If the sale of Wilson was crucial to having any sort of budget and helps SISU sit tight at Sixfields for the next 12 months with the business breaking even ...... when exactly was the decision taken to sell him? :thinking about:
J
Jack Griffin
Guest
Correct OSB, the SISU plan is league survival, while hanging on in Northampton and toying with the FL & fans.
Do not expect anything else. The mind games continue.
Do not expect anything else. The mind games continue.