italiahorse
Well-Known Member
Can we EVER forgive them ?
They want the Ricoh that is the priority we all know this.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
exactly robbo so why embarress everybody with this charade ? Their pr is absolutey laughable.
Can we EVER forgive them ?
I thought it was already
The problem is they have 4 options available to them:
1) Purchase the Ricoh.
2) Purchase the Higgs Share.
3) Take a lower rent offer with the relevant revenues available.
4) Build their own Ground.
Problem is
1) The Council say it's not for sale despite the Club wanting to buy it.
2) They tried this but didn't the Council vetoed the deal.
3) A new rental deal has been offered but nothing about the Matchday revenues, plus the Club won't come back as tenants.
4) Plan B.
It's not the Clubs fault entirely.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AgreedI think we'll sign Marshall, and possible McGeough.
1, have they ever made a serious offer to buy it?
2, Didn't they pull out of the deal?
3 Couldn't afford to play there for free with out the Pie money?
4 Who knows? £25 million for a shed need to sell lots of pies no wonder we are all obese.
Not quite this is me
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can't imagine you with a smile :thinking about:
I am always smiling
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1) They hoped to negotiate with Ann Lucas only for Ann Lucas to then offer a rental deal.
2) According to one side, Labo and Fisher have always said that a deal was agreed the Council have never denied this.
3) They might be able to but why should the Club not be entitled to the revenues it generates? A rental deal is all but a nonstarter as all trust has now gone between the two parties.
4) It's obvious they'd rather use that money to purchase the Ricoh but then if options 1, 2 and 3 are closed off then what option do they have?
Option 4 leave our Club to some one who cares the only one to save our club. IMO
We could argue the pros and cons and who's right and who's wrong but to be fair we will never know if ether side were ever serious with offers made etc.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's easier said than done I can't see a que of wealthy local businessmen waiting in the wings to purchase the Club.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
sw88 - will delfounso definitely be available? I thought they rated him at Villa as one for the future? They did a year or two back anyway.
I don't think we have a chance of signing Akpom permanently...mate of of mine supports Arsenal and says he's shit hot and they want to hold on to him. Shame about Petrasso cause he looks really good.
What do you guys think of McGeoch so far? Feel like we haven't really seen that much of him?
Right. Let's just pretend, for argument sake, that they will all stay and we will have a squad big enough to cover injuries next season.
I think he's out of contract and judging by the limited chances he's had at villa, and the lack of successes he's had on loan (for a striker his goals to games ratio isn't that good I don't think), I'd be surprised if AV wanted to keep him longer. If they do, he'll be their version of Shaun Jeffers and us I think
1) They hoped to negotiate with Ann Lucas only for Ann Lucas to then offer a rental deal.
2) According to one side, Labo and Fisher have always said that a deal was agreed the Council have never denied this.
3) They might be able to but why should the Club not be entitled to the revenues it generates? A rental deal is all but a nonstarter as all trust has now gone between the two parties.
4) It's obvious they'd rather use that money to purchase the Ricoh but then if options 1, 2 and 3 are closed off then what option do they have?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1) They hoped to negotiate with Ann Lucas only for Ann Lucas to then offer a rental deal.
2) According to one side, Labo and Fisher have always said that a deal was agreed the Council have never denied this.
3) They might be able to but why should the Club not be entitled to the revenues it generates? A rental deal is all but a nonstarter as all trust has now gone between the two parties.
4) It's obvious they'd rather use that money to purchase the Ricoh but then if options 1, 2 and 3 are closed off then what option do they have?
No3 The Club did have those revenues but chose to sell them.Therefore unless they buy them back they have
no rights to them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?