chiefdave
Well-Known Member
Surely stationary traffic is less likely to cause accidents than the quality of driving you normally see on the m25
Surely stationary traffic is less likely to cause accidents than the quality of driving you normally see on the m25No it ain’t, should have been longer it could have caused accidents and people would have got hurt
It’s a bizarre sentence for a non violent crimeSurely stationary traffic is less likely to cause accidents than the quality of driving you normally see on the m25
Albanians completely stopped handful
Should be longerIt’s a bizarre sentence for a non violent crime
Coming in large numbersAlbanians have stopped what?
it’s probably supposed to act as a deterrent. Perfectly reasonable, especially as they will end up doing nothing like their sentence. Less than half probably,It’s a bizarre sentence for a non violent crime
OMG, the Tories did something right,Coming in large numbers
Tories did a deal and it worked
To borrow a phrase from Boicey, that’s laughable halfwittery.Surely stationary traffic is less likely to cause accidents than the quality of driving you normally see on the m25
Not helped when on the odd occasions when it’s tried, other passengers prevent the flight taking off.It is a thing that hasn’t really been done until the last 12 months or so
Like most of these things it’s not as easy as saying you’re going home goodbye
It is a thing that hasn’t really been done until the last 12 months or so
Like most of these things it’s not as easy as saying you’re going home goodbye
Presumably helped by not having the civil service ”blob” acting against them.
Michelle Mone says hi.No it isn’t. The disruption they caused and the money they cost - if someone had stolen that much money they would have expected jail time. Hopefully it will act as a deterrent unlike the tea and biscuits they usually get from law enforcement.
Not helped when on the odd occasions when it’s tried, other passengers prevent the flight taking off.
Plus human rights lawyers.
No it isn’t. The disruption they caused and the money they cost - if someone had stolen that much money they would have expected jail time. Hopefully it will act as a deterrent unlike the tea and biscuits they usually get from law enforcement.
I thought the civil service were supposed to enact the decisions of parliament, not choose whether they wanted to work with the government or not.If your political wing has to resort to calling everyone else NPCs and the blob, maybe they’re just not very good at working with others?
I thought the civil service were supposed to enact the decisions of parliament, not choose whether they wanted to work with the government or not.
What’s she got to do with it?Michelle Mone says hi.
Preventing ordinary people going about their lawful business.What disruption did they cause?
10,300 (as of 2023) 12% of prisoners are foreign nationals,with Albanians being the highest number.No idea. I’d guess around 10%.
Preventing ordinary people going about their lawful business.
You said if people had stolen that much money they'd expect jail time.What’s she got to do with it?
Presumably helped by not having the civil service ”blob” acting against them.
"Projects" like PPE?
Spend it on processing and get a better system in place.
It won't do a thing.
It’s a load of bollocks.
Very difficult to work with someone who is ideologically totally opposed to what you are trying to do.They’re still human and need working with. If everyone you meet is a dickhead, you’re the dickhead.
FFS, being stuck in a traffic jam on the M25, or anywhere else the JSO scum and cunts have been active, preventing people getting to hospital appointments, to work, holding up ambulances etc.How’s that?
If the allegations are proven, then yes she should face jail time.You said if people had stolen that much money they'd expect jail time.
The two schemes are completely different. i don’t think £28 million a year spread across Africa and the Middle East will make a blind bit of difference.You were seemingly OK with the Rwanda scheme.
The two schemes are completely different. i don’t think £28 million a year spread across Africa and teh Middle East will make a blind bit of difference.
But will the £84m significantly reduce the number of people crossing the channel?I find it strange you bemoan £84m as a laughable waste of money when at the very least that will improve some people's lives, but have no issue with spending £250m on literally fuck all.
It more or less mirrors the UK's percentage of foreign-born residents then; if anything it's slightly less.10,300 (as of 2023) 12% of prisoners are foreign nationals,with Albanians being the highest number.
The Rwanda scheme never made a blind bit of difference. Cost us £280M for nothing. The numbers arriving by boats actually went up. If £28M a year has any effect at all it will be money far wiser spent than the Rwanda scheme.The two schemes are completely different. i don’t think £28 million a year spread across Africa and the Middle East will make a blind bit of difference.
But will the £84m significantly reduce the number of people crossing the channel?
It’s Labour cancelling the Rwanda project that has meant that £250m has been spent on literally fuck all.
If they are that worried, they can always return.Fucking scandalous. Wonder what the people in this country who fled from Hong Kong must be thinking?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?