Yep can't argue with that. Told to save and invest. I have a house that is only worth what it is whist I'm in it and as you say daughter will get hammered when I pass it on. Crap savings rate on what I put aside and my pension plan wont last if they remove or keep pushing up the age for state pension.I was just saying it in response to that about tax payers not helping pensioners.
If I am told to work hard, pay into my pension, pay my taxes etc and when I get to 65 it's "Oh nah you're going to need to work 10 more years, the state aren't helping you and if you have paid off your mortgage and die your daughter is going to get hammered with tax on the house" doesn't really sound as good?
Some people really seem to have issue with the older generation.
Becuase younger people are presumably fed up at being told “cut down Netflix and stop drinking costa coffee- then you can afford a deposit on a house”I was just saying it in response to that about tax payers not helping pensioners.
If I am told to work hard, pay into my pension, pay my taxes etc and when I get to 65 it's "Oh nah you're going to need to work 10 more years, the state aren't helping you and if you have paid off your mortgage and die your daughter is going to get hammered with tax on the house" doesn't really sound as good?
Some people really seem to have issue with the older generation.
Very good advice.Becuase younger people are presumably fed up at being told “cut down Netflix and stop drinking costa coffee- then you can afford a deposit on a house”
all whilst they got theirs for 50p and and a bag of crisps.
there’s also the issue of birthrates going down and the country getting older, we don’t pay for our pensions we pay for the current pensioners, and as there is less working age people and more people getting older younger people are getting taxed to high heaven to pay for a generation who has ultimately benefitted far more than any other generation
I’m lucky i own my own house, but I’d hate to be in a position some younger people are in. We’re often told we’re in this together but let’s face it with the triple lock that’s hardly true
There should be an opt out on paying for certain things...
Compared to those who treat there body as a temple, Smokers pay more, vapers will soon be paying more as well. Drinkers pay more. Should put a 20% tax on junk food, McDonalds, Burger King, KFC, Subway etc. to address the obese.That's a slippery slope, Nick.
You advocating that people pay more towards the NHS if you treat your body like sh*t?
The cost of administering something as complex as you're suggesting would be insane.
Surely the increase in house prices is basic economics of supply and demand. we have more people in the country now than back then, meaning less housing available. Yes prices were cheaper, but wages were less and often only one income as mums generally stayed at home. Lower divorce rates would have also meant generally a traditional family unit all under a single roof.
You can blame the older generation for some things, but their only benefit really is the advance in medical care which I take as a good thing for us all and the increase in house prices which isnt their fault and of no benefit to them until they sell up and down-size. Everything else is simply jealousy by a generation (of which I am part) who arent prepared to mend and make do but want everything and want it now. Cars, phones, TV etc in addition to subscriptions that you mention.
There should be an opt out on paying for certain things.
No kids - you arent paying for education
Let's face it, while we are saying OAPs cant think to rely on their care from the tax payer we are sending billions to Ukraine and billions on hotels for asylum seekers.
It's "fuck you, I know you have worked hard all of your life and saved and paid tax but no more."
Where's the motivation for people to do well?
Compared to those who treat there body as a temple, Smokers pay more, vapers will soon be paying more as well. Drinkers pay more. Should put a 20% tax on junk food, McDonalds, Burger King, KFC, Subway etc. to address the obese.
A gish gallop of bollocks I’m afraid. House prices have been increasing before immigration the change in building was the Town and Country Planning Act that restricted supply. That was post war.
we judge house price on wage to price ratio so wages being less is taken into account. It’s sky rocketed by this measure:
View attachment 39093
The wealthy are very keen to keep supply down and their asset values up. That’s why they are high: because whenever someone tries to build all the OAPs get out with complaints about their dog walking area or “not enough services” or any other bollocks.
Boomers had: triple lock, free uni education, sufficient social housing, a better economy and cheaper house prices. They’ve then set about as the largest voting block their entire life making politicians keep all their advantages and screw over everyone else.
Those are just the facts.
The motivation to do well if you get more money mate. You don’t also need the entire political system set up to advantage you.
The “billions to Ukraine” is almost all military equipment. Does Doris need a rocket launcher?
You spout endless bullshit you’ve picked up off Twitter or whatever. But it doesn’t stand the least bit of scrutiny. Yeah let’s give people an opt out on tax. Fucking genius.
The motivation to do well if you get more money mate. You don’t also need the entire political system set up to advantage you.
The “billions to Ukraine” is almost all military equipment. Does Doris need a rocket launcher?
You spout endless bullshit you’ve picked up off Twitter or whatever. But it doesn’t stand the least bit of scrutiny. Yeah let’s give people an opt out on tax. Fucking genius.
Boomers also had low wages and astonishingly high interest rates. Didn’t Blair introduce university tuition fees In 1998? Brown sold all the gold at rock bottom price and fucked private pensions.A gish gallop of bollocks I’m afraid. House prices have been increasing before immigration the change in building was the Town and Country Planning Act that restricted supply. That was post war.
we judge house price on wage to price ratio so wages being less is taken into account. It’s sky rocketed by this measure:
View attachment 39093
The wealthy are very keen to keep supply down and their asset values up. That’s why they are high: because whenever someone tries to build all the OAPs get out with complaints about their dog walking area or “not enough services” or any other bollocks.
Boomers had: triple lock, free uni education, sufficient social housing, a better economy and cheaper house prices. They’ve then set about as the largest voting block their entire life making politicians keep all their advantages and screw over everyone else.
Those are just the facts.
At least you know we boomers will all be dead soon enough and the following generations will act in an entirely different and less self serving manner.
Low wages is only a useful metric when compared to real world price of things at that timeBoomers also had low wages and astonishingly high interest rates. Didn’t Blair introduce university tuition fees In 1998? Brown sold all the gold at rock bottom price and fucked private pensions.
Amazing how OAPs can be so effective when they aren’t basically organised.
Not enough services is a reasonable cause for objection, I’m not so sure about preservation of the great crested newt (For example).
Would house prices be so high if there were 1 million less people in the UK?
At least you know we boomers will all be dead soon enough and the following generations will act in an entirely different and less self serving manner.
What you've obviously chosen to ignore is that the boomers were paying extortionate interest rates back in the day.Boomers had: triple lock, free uni education, sufficient social housing, a better economy and cheaper house prices. They’ve then set about as the largest voting block their entire life making politicians keep all their advantages and screw over everyone else.
Those are just the facts.
The interest rate of 15% on a 10k house is a lot less than 6% on a 250k house.What you've obviously chosen to ignore is that the boomers were paying extortionate interest rates back in the day.
When I bought my first property (2 bed maisonette) I was playing 15% interest rates, which meant the percentage of my wage that was eaten up by my mortgage was almost exactly the same as my daughter is paying today for her new 2 bed flat.
In the last 10/15 years we've seen historically low interest rates, which has made home ownership more obtainable.
The last time so many working people had the opportunity to buy was when Margaret Thatcher bought in the "right to buy" policy, which was a massive opportunity for working people.
Part of the reason the demand for housing is currently so high, is undoubtedly down to the effect of net migration (legal or otherwise)
You simply can't sit by and happily accept the current level of immigration on one hand, and then moan about the cost of housing on the other.
And that my friend, is a real fact.
The interest rate of 15% on a 10k house is a lot less than 6% on a 250k house.
also selling off the housing stock without rebuilding has led to the housing crisis.
boomers would definitely be the pull the ladder up generation, and are now surprised the millennials and latest generation aren’t thanking them for that
Mortgage rates were a lot lower than that for a very long time over recent years and 6% looks quite high (4.29% fixed for 2 years from Halifax) . The house I had when mortgage rates were at 15% cost about £105,000. So interest payments were higher. Icing on the cake is that the house was sold 3 years later for £70,000. Nationwide house price calculator reckons it would be worth £300k today.The interest rate of 15% on a 10k house is a lot less than 6% on a 250k house.
also selling off the housing stock without rebuilding has led to the housing crisis.
boomers would definitely be the pull the ladder up generation, and are now surprised the millennials and latest generation aren’t thanking them for that
Was going on rough average house price. Point stands - 6% will still be more on 150k houseWhat's wrong with somebody spending £150k on a terrace for their first buy? Why does it have to be £250k?
Was going on rough average house price. Point stands - 6% will still be more on 150k house
It’s a generalisation, I can find 100s of interviews where that advice is levelled. We’re at the highest point of taxation for the working class in history. Energy costs are sky high - lack of housing stock is causing an increase is prices everywhere, and the competition is levelled at people getting buy to let mortgages that are then chargingI was just on about Coventry as an example, obviously if it was London etc it would be silly money.
If people are shopping in Earlsdon for their first house buy and getting upset because people are saying "give up the costa coffee" for example then I'm not sure what to suggest.
Still need to find the deposit money on a 150k house. Very rare to put down less than 10%. Saving £15k, when you are on £30k, no partner and rent is very difficult.Was going on rough average house price. Point stands - 6% will still be more on 150k house
Still need to find the deposit money on a 150k house. Very rare to put down less than 10%. Saving £15k, when you are on £30k, no partner and rent is very difficult.
You're all focusing on house prices. As I said on my initial post, what good is that to them unless they downsize and free up their cash? It's gone up in value whilst they've been in it. I'm sure some of you would rather the old were homeless instead, I imagine you'll think differently when it's you.
I can’t imagine people in my generation won’t be working when they are 70+ to pay for their housingYou're all focusing on house prices. As I said on my initial post, what good is that to them unless they downsize and free up their cash? It's gone up in value whilst they've been in it. I'm sure some of you would rather the old were homeless instead, I imagine you'll think differently when it's you.
Probably will be is that the fault of the old for them or you? It's a fekkin joke this conversation is even happening.I can’t imagine people in my generation won’t be working when they are 70+ to pay for their housing
Well it isn’t the fault of my generation that’s for certain.Probably will be is that the fault of the old for them or you? It's a fekkin joke this conversation is even happening.
How old are you? I imagine 35-40?Well it isn’t the fault of my generation that’s for certain.
Arguably is. The constant pressure on this generation telling them not to have kids if they can’t afford them, then shafting them with NIMBYism and voting on policies that are to their detriment has led to low birth rates meaning this generation isn’t going to have a generation big enough to pay their pensionsProbably will be is that the fault of the old for them or you? It's a fekkin joke this conversation is even happening.
I’m 26How old are you? I imagine 35-40?
Arguably is. The constant pressure on this generation telling them not to have kids if they can’t afford them, then shafting them with NIMBYism and voting on policies that are to their detriment has led to low birth rates meaning this generation isn’t going to have a generation big enough to pay their pensions
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?