Do you want to discuss boring politics? (31 Viewers)

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Jammy coffin dodgers.
As someone with a terminal condition who has been undertaking some unpleasant therapies in order to avoid a coffin over the coming months, I found your comment extremely distasteful and distressing. I hope for your older family members sake that assisted dying isn’t introduced - you will be studying the small print very closely.

I was trying to remember who is the most objectionable ageist on here. TBF your name was high on the list, this post has saved me from having to do any further research.

In the meantime, fuck off with comments like this. Think of something new and original.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
This is the second article Cov Telegraph have done about a protest march in Nuneaton with no mention whatever of what it is about. After a bit of searching I think I've figured out it is a 'Britain First' march and of course there will be a counter protest.

 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
This is the second article Cov Telegraph have done about a protest march in Nuneaton with no mention whatever of what it is about. After a bit of searching I think I've figured out it is a 'Britain First' march and of course there will be a counter protest.

Typically poor journalism. Not sure about the Police’s comments either. IF there is trouble and it spilled into the market and shoppers and or their kids get caught in the crossfire there should be some officials under intense scrutiny.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
As someone with a terminal condition who has been undertaking some unpleasant therapies in order to avoid a coffin over the coming months, I found your comment extremely distasteful and distressing. I hope for your older family members sake that assisted dying isn’t introduced - you will be studying the small print very closely.

I was trying to remember who is the most objectionable ageist on here. TBF your name was high on the list, this post has saved me from having to do any further research.

In the meantime, fuck off with comments like this. Think of something new and original.
Was never meant to harm or distress anyone and I apologise that it, understandably, has.

It was supposed to be a joke around "jammy dodgers".
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Rail fares up by 4.6%. "Needed to fund the investments to improve the network" according to some dickhead minister wheeled out to justify it. The exact same line we've had for every year of privatisation really. CHANGE.
If only there were some other way of enabling funds to be directed towards improving the infrastructure. Like if there were individuals or companies being given money by the rail firms because they owned a bit of paper.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Rail fares up by 4.6%. "Needed to fund the investments to improve the network" according to some dickhead minister wheeled out to justify it. The exact same line we've had for every year of privatisation really. CHANGE.
Does paying train drivers more than airline pilots improve the network?

It’s all just a load of bollocks spouted by people who are out of their depth.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Wholesale privatisation of the NHS has never been on the table as private companies realise that keeping people alive is expensive. Thankfully, their friends in the Labour party have found a solution:

And this is a big part of the reason the NHS is fucked. The routine and profitable services are taken on by private healthcare companies who reap the rewards. The rest if left with the NHS to deal with but with increasingly less resources as the money is being spent elsewhere and the staff are poached by private providers.

I had a fun day at the hospital on Saturday and the person I saw was very scathing that I was only now seeing someone actually employed by the NHS despite first having gone to my GP in 2010. Bounced around from place to place with symptoms being patched up rather than anyone looking at the overall cause. Was told this happens all the time because nobody is looking outside the narrow band of whatever particular service they are being paid to provide.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
When @Ed_Miliband took office, he cancelled the full costing of the Net Zero grid commissioned by his predecessor,
@ClaireCoutinho. .

However, one of the UK's top energy system experts Professor Gordon Hughes, has now published one anyway.

He concludes that Labour's Clean Power 2030 plan will increase the cost of living by £900 or more for the average family.

 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
And this is a big part of the reason the NHS is fucked. The routine and profitable services are taken on by private healthcare companies who reap the rewards. The rest if left with the NHS to deal with but with increasingly less resources as the money is being spent elsewhere and the staff are poached by private providers.

I had a fun day at the hospital on Saturday and the person I saw was very scathing that I was only now seeing someone actually employed by the NHS despite first having gone to my GP in 2010. Bounced around from place to place with symptoms being patched up rather than anyone looking at the overall cause. Was told this happens all the time because nobody is looking outside the narrow band of whatever particular service they are being paid to provide.

Got to question WTF is going on when the NHS employs 1.5m people (about 1 in 20 of working age population)

Ps I hope they’re finally sorting out the problem Dave
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Got to question WTF is going on when the NHS employs 1.5m people (about 1 in 20 of working age population)

Ps I hope they’re finally sorting out the problem Dave
Well it's a service that literally everyone in the country needs in some form or another, including a large number who are almost entirely reliant on it. Fact that there are massive waiting lists and jobs that aren't filled tells you it should be more.
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Ps I hope they’re finally sorting out the problem Dave
If you want another example of how the NHS works basically got told this is the treatment we can offer you but off the record there is far more effective treatment that isn't offered by the NHS so you'd need to go private and pay somewhere in the region of £5K.

The best part? The reason the treatment is not offered on the NHS is because of cost, the treatment they will offer will cost in the region of £8K. Make it make sense.
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
If you want another example of how the NHS works basically got told this is the treatment we can offer you but off the record there is far more effective treatment that isn't offered by the NHS so you'd need to go private and pay somewhere in the region of £5K.

The best part? The reason the treatment is not offered on the NHS is because of cost, the treatment they will offer will cost in the region of £8K. Make it make sense.

Why don't you just go private?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
No 10 has put a tweet with a purported voxpop from some young people supporting the economic benefits of spending money on weapons. It's absolutely sickening propaganda Putin would be proud of.

Meanwhile, back in the real world

 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
No 10 has put a tweet with a purported voxpop from some young people supporting the economic benefits of spending money on weapons. It's absolutely sickening propaganda Putin would be proud of.

Meanwhile, back in the real world


When did the left become the war party supporting the military industrial complex. 🤔

Burgon & Corbyn think otherwise, normally I deride them but on this I agree with them.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
You’re going to have to be clearer are you for or against this?
Am I against government spending on what it wants to spend money on? NO

Am I against government using arguments for spending on one sector that it contradicts for spending in other sectors? Yes

Do I agree that government spending increases money in the private sector? Yes
 
Last edited:

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Just need to employ significantly more GPs to enable more practices to opt in to provide OOH services
Wasnt responsibility for OOH services specifically excluded from the GP contract agreed with the Labour government of the time? My experience was that GPs were reluctant to any change if there wasn’t something in it for them. Things like electronic referral systems, changes to the cervical cancer service (moving from cytology to HPV testing).

Some observations regarding the specific proposal you have made. Where are these significantly more GPs going to come from? Where is the money going to come from? If successful, where will the medical staff who have diverted for other paths to pursue a career as a GP come from? The NHS is already suffering from a shortage of medics in quite a number of specialties.

Even if the number of university places for medicine doubled, it would be at least a decade before the first intake achieved the experience and qualifications necessary (true for any specialty).
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Wasnt responsibility for OOH services specifically excluded from the GP contract agreed with the Labour government of the time? My experience was that GPs were reluctant to any change if there wasn’t something in it for them. Things like electronic referral systems, changes to the cervical cancer service (moving from cytology to HPV testing).

Some observations regarding the specific proposal you have made. Where are these significantly more GPs going to come from? Where is the money going to come from? If successful, where will the medical staff who have diverted for other paths to pursue a career as a GP come from? The NHS is already suffering from a shortage of medics in quite a number of specialties.

Even if the number of university places for medicine doubled, it would be at least a decade before the first intake achieved the experience and qualifications necessary (true for any specialty).
There are more peoplecompleting medical courses than there are training places, they have been oversubscribed for years:

 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
Jammy coffin dodgers.
Some good news for you:

” For the 30 years up to 2011, the number of people dying in the UK was falling but that has changed as the people born during the boom in births following World War Two have grown old. Over the next decade, the number of deaths a year is expected to increase by 12%. “

Copied from:-


Really annoying to me for two reasons, one being how much time, effort and money was sent in the early 2010s on developing community end of life care to facilitate people whose preference was to die at home. The second is that, having been unaware of the current situation described, despite having being involved in all that work at the time, I personally didn’t have a huge desire to die at home. My preference is not to die at all, although my belief is that immortality as a stand alone concept is probably not all that great a prospect. Immortality and everlasting health would be the minimum requirement. As that personal preference isn’t going to happen, it is extremely upsetting to see how poor hospital end of life care is being reported to be😟😟.
 
Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
There are more peoplecompleting medical courses than there are training places, they have been oversubscribed for years:


This seems bonkers to me. Is the worry that they’ll all fuck off as soon as they’ve trained? Cant we golden handcuff them or something. We cut off supply of critical labour all over the shop it seems.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top