Nah it's delicate .The flavour is abhorrent
Nah it's delicate .
I love it's mushiness when it's overcooked Lol
Food for old folks ,will take on flavours be that introduced or alongside other ingredients .
How about celeriac, fantastic to introduce it's subtle flavour on other ingredients.
It's brilliant in curries and roasted with spices. I'm gonna try a cauliflower steak as it goes.The flavour is abhorrent
Me too, my missus' family don't have it with Sunday dinner, heathensI love cauliflower cheese
My mate who works in Sweden and he's been on it for years. Says it makes a huge difference. Don't think its mandatory or anything like that, down to individual companies. But as it seems to lead to increased productivity, less sick days and increased employee retention why would companies resist it?
Again, I am not saying Johnson is a fascist, but he does keep doing the sorts of things fascists like to do.
Also: The Eton educated former Mayor of London talking about metropolitan elites.
I've wondered if we could do a system whereby each position has two people, each doing 3.5 days (or 4+3) paid pro-rata so we have an economy that works all the time. The idea of a weekend is an antiquated one now. Also many sectors where you could get 3 people on 8hr shifts a day to enable round-the-clock working.
Of course there's a problem with filling positions - if they're jobs people don't want to do you do end up without enough people to implement it.
Yet more brilliance
Oh yes I'm sure an accusation from the minister *checks notes * Robert Jenrick cannot be easily rebuffed. Why aren't whey going on the attack about it instead?Don't agree with it, bu if they oppose it accussations of assisting corruption will inevitably be made. Rich coming from a government that's given billions on T&T/PPE to their mates but some people will just lap it up.
Oh yes I'm sure an accusation from the minister *checks notes * Robert Jenrick cannot be easily rebuffed. Why aren't whey going on the attack about it instead?
The article says 'Anderson has consistently denied wrongdoing and has not been charged'. Is that not been charged as they can't find anything to charge him with or not been charged and the investigation is over as they are two very different things.Don't agree with it, bu if they oppose it accussations of assisting corruption will inevitably be made.
And possible pig fuckerYou missed out 'and Oxford' and member of the Bullingdon Club.
But it'd be like the anti-semitism thing. Brought up every five minutes on the news but any mention of the Tories anti-Semitism an Islamophobia report was just brushed aside or had them being accused of deflecting from their own problems. Same would happen here, fully aided and abetted by the many rags that are owned by Tory donors.
Every time, even on the supposedly leftie BBC, it's maybe asked once every five interviews so as they can't be accused of ignoring it, it gets deflected away and not followed up on in further questioning.
And possible pig fucker
The evidence (some might say circumstantial) against Jenrick actually exists though. The evidence against Liverpool cllrs is supposition so far.
What is the Labour objective in supporting it? If it's just about avoiding being seen to be uncaring about corruption then it really is pathetic.
Replacing one corrupt organisation with another perhaps?To be fair the report is pretty damning about the everyday running of Liverpool council and it is accepted by Liverpool council themselves.
Why would Westminster Labour oppose something that the local party have already accepted?
To be fair the report is pretty damning about the everyday running of Liverpool council and it is accepted by Liverpool council themselves.
Why would Westminster Labour oppose something that the local party have already accepted?
Got some people in the City making complaints that they're having to work 95 hour weeks. Want to have that maximised to 80, which is still a ridiculous number but those in the industry are fighting it.
That's what happens when you get people utterly obsessed with money in charge. Couldn't give a fuck about the toll it takes on people mentally and physically - the £££ makes it all worthwhile.
As I said what do they gain for opposing in Westminster something that the local council have already accepted?
What's more accurate historically, Britain Elects or YouGov? Because YouGov looks very different. This isn't an argument starter, I can't be arsed with that anymore. Just putting it out there for anyone interested.One for the Starmer haters. Labour’s polling vs a year ago. Closed the gap by 15 points during a time the government are handing out free cash to stay at home. Could be worse.
I think Britain Elects report all polls, they sometimes do an amalgamated tracker of all polls but not seen one in a while.What's more accurate historically, Britain Elects or YouGov? Because YouGov looks very different. This isn't an argument starter, I can't be arsed with that anymore. Just putting it out there for anyone interested.
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
Theres a few on the front page of their website.I think Britain Elects report all polls, they sometimes do an amalgamated tracker of all polls but not seen one in a while.
Apparently it’s forensic... what the electorate secretly want.Labour really are a bunch of wet tosspots ...do they ever not abstain from a vote ever ? Its their favourite thing these days ...have no say on absolutely anything
Embarrassing
Yea , we all love trying to guess what our opposition is really aboutApparently it’s forensic... what the electorate secretly want.
Yea , we all love trying to guess what our opposition is really about
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?