Because it didn't actually affect anyone. They were inside all day working together. If they'd stayed behind and had a coffee nothing would've mattered. Outside is actually safer. The only difference is it was called a party and they had some wine. Boohoo.
Tbh I don't know enough about it still only tabloid headlines, but yes absolutely far more important than a supposed party.The illegal VIP channel for the awarding of PPE contracts affects everyone in the country though, I'm sure you'd agree heads should roll for that?
Because it didn't actually affect anyone. They were inside all day working together. If they'd stayed behind and had a coffee nothing would've mattered. Outside is actually safer. The only difference is it was called a party and they had some wine. Boohoo.
The absolute irony of people asking for fine refunds whilst shouting down the PM is hypocrisy of the highest. It's either right or wrong.What do you mean it didn't affect anyone?
What about the who got fined for doing exactly what these pricks did?
What about the people who didn't get to say goodbye to loved ones while these pricks were quaffing wine?
If they don't follow the rules then why should anyone else?
It's utterly absurd to say it didn't affect anyone.
The absolute irony of people asking for fine refunds whilst shouting down the PM is hypocrisy of the highest. It's either right or wrong.
Again, them quaffing or however you call it at the end of a working day killed nobody.
Tbh I don't know enough about it still only tabloid headlines, but yes absolutely far more important than a supposed party.
Sadly, probably correct.Politics really is about the here and now at election time
Labour leads Conservatives by 12 points in poll | Labour | The Guardian
<p>Guardian/ICM poll gives Ed Miliband's party 41% of vote and David Cameron's 29% – the biggest gap in almost a decade</p>amp.theguardian.com
Right, so the deciding factor of good or bad behaviour is whether it killed someone or not.
To be fair that probably is how Tories and Tory voters think actually.
4 years into a supposed shit show, a world pandemic ongoing, wtf would they normally be debating and yet still the best attack the opposition have is 'yeah but you went to a party in your garden 18 months ago'. Whatever you might think about Boris, if I was a Labour voter I'd be genuinely concerned at the lack of genuine substance.
Context is important is it not? It's not just 'going to a party in your back garden' is it? Labour tried to get the vat on energy cut to help with the cost of living. Obviously voted down.
Right, so the deciding factor of good or bad behaviour is whether it killed someone or not.
To be fair that probably is how Tories and Tory voters think actually.
Whilst the guy whos leaving party it was (and now a political editor at the Sun) is churning out stories about Chinese spys that are 5 years old in a pathetic attempt to turn the heat off Boris (and then himself)Telegraph going in for the kill by not putting it behind their paywall.
A booze run to fill a suitcase with wine: The full story of our exclusive on those Downing Street parties
While No 10 staff partied, the Queen was preparing to grieve alone at the funeral of Prince Philip because of Covid restrictionswww.telegraph.co.uk
Do you not think such poor polling will do for Johnson?
This is just such perfect Facebook nonsense that has radicalised your granddad
When did they actually do any work? I remember Ministers using the nonsense phrase 'we're working around the clock' a lot but clearly they really weren't.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Every time I see this fella I think it's someone sending up Boris Johnson.If Russell Slade and Clive Eakin had a baby.
View attachment 23495
A 5yo spy would be a bit useless, surely?!?Whilst the guy whos leaving party it was (and now a political editor at the Sun) is churning out stories about Chinese spys that are 5 years old in a pathetic attempt to turn the heat off Boris (and then himself)
Will they not just say it was following the science etc?I've suggested it before but what's going to come next is:
Tories install new leader
New leader makes an implicit admission that some Covid restrictions may have been disproportionate (e.g. open air meeting), or maybe commissions a report into them
Labour flounders in the face of not having opposed any of the restrictions
No, it isn't going to wash with the demographic they're chasing who already half blame scientists anywayWill they not just say it was following the science etc?
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
So easily triggered, it's copied ffs and thought it would be a fun place to post it. Anyhow I don't do Facebook but if I did it would beWhich of these do you have as your profile picture on Facebook?:
A) a motorbike
B) you holding a fish
C) a dog
So easily triggered, it's copied ffs and thought it would be a fun place to post it. Anyhow I don't do Facebook but if I did it would be
D) Me dressed as Boris teabagging you mum
I've suggested it before but what's going to come next is:
Tories install new leader
New leader makes an implicit admission that some Covid restrictions may have been disproportionate (e.g. open air meeting), or maybe commissions a report into them
Labour flounders in the face of not having opposed any of the restrictions
Cheap bar in Parliament too.Need to get me a job at number 10, they love a swig.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?