Do you want to discuss boring politics? (184 Viewers)

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
Mate he lives upstairs from Boris and is the actual resident of no,10 and is easy to taint.

He also wants to pay for his schemes which weren't his by plunging the UK back into austerity.

I agree, but the point is not the truth but what the general public perceive.

Do you think the average person knows of his financial ideology and would reinstate austerity arguably harder than ever before? Or do they think he's a spender cos of furlough and EOTHO.

Do you think most people think about his living arrangements and what he can and can't see from his window?

Do you think they'd care about his priviliged upbringing giving him a nice job in the City before marrying into massive wealth, or just they'll see he's been successful and so therefore must know a thing or two about running the economy?

At least he'd actually put in the effort, unlike the current incumbent, but sadly if you're working from the wrong plan you can put in as much effort as you like - you're still going to end up in the shit.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
it's the only move they know how to make. They are now irretrievably in the public eye and the longer Johnson tries to tough it out the worst it will be for them.

Still no one cares about parties do they.

Also to answer some people yes the blatant corruption of the PPE contracts etc. should be what is bringing them done but people are detached from that. The reason this is what is sticking is people gave up so much and lost so much and now they can see the cunts who told them to do so were laughing at them.

Go on David I’ll bet you £500 to charity Labour won’t be the majority party in parliament in the next election. Yes it’s a few years away but I’m sure an account can be set up where we can both stick the money in
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
This Operation Red Meat thing in the Sunday Times has got to be a piss take.

Solve the cost of living crisis by freezing the BBC license fee and get the military to turn back immigrants & refugees in the channel. How stupid do they think voters are?

Very.

We're the great unwashed and haven't been to public school or Oxbridge, so we're thick as fuck. Half of them are probably surprised we're intelligent enough to tie shoelaces and wonder why they bother putting words onto campaign posters cos we clearly aren't clever enough to be able to read.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Very.

We're the great unwashed and haven't been to public school or Oxbridge, so we're thick as fuck. Half of them are probably surprised we're intelligent enough to tie shoelaces and wonder why they bother putting words onto campaign posters cos we clearly aren't clever enough to be able to read.

So working class people who are voting Tory are thick as fuck and dogshit as they don’t do what you think

Wow your arrogance and inverse snobbery is amazing
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
We were talking about current public perceptions
Yeah, this is where he's ideally suited. Perception is he throws cash about, those who aren't ideologically keen on that will see his true state as fiscal competence.

Win / win.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Yeah, this is where he's ideally suited. Perception is he throws cash about, those who aren#t ideologically keen on that will see his true state as fiscal competence.

Win / win.

Did you see Starmer this morning on the politics programme - do you think that was a Prime Minister in waiting?
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Did you have soldiers with your boiled eggs this morning?

No or I’d have chocked laughing

He’s literally an IDS figure useless. Actually I’ll say it you’d be better off with Rayner. Yes she’d need a lot of media training but she has something about her at least
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
I agree entirely about how each system just ends up corrupted by the main parties and voting individuals leaves a very large possibility of some charismatic slef-serving charlatan taking over and running it like a dictator.

For me second chamber should be PR based on %votes for each party in the GE. Each party gets to choose which people represent them in the chamber. Like you say, not ideal but better than a house where each change of government just leads to an ever more bloated house as they give peerages to more people to give them control.

I like the PR ideal for HoL, however, I’d want to cut the numbers.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
So working class people who are voting Tory are thick as fuck and dogshit as they don’t do what you think

Wow your arrogance and inverse snobbery is amazing

Nope. Not for not doing what I think. For carrying on believing that a bunch of people who treat them like second class citizens and who's ideology works against their best interests, all because they have a posh sounding voice and/or lots of money.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
I like the PR ideal for HoL, however, I’d want to cut the numbers.

I agree about the numbers. Think there's over 1000 lords now.

Should be no more than the number of MP's in the Commons. Ideally less, but enough to accurately represent the result. Say 250-500
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
PR for one chamber, FPTP for the other seems the best solution really, debate which way round it goes. Allows checks and balances, but keeps the direct representation a local MP supplies.

If they're both elected, it kind of negates the upper/lower house argument. They should sit side by side.

FPTP is around constituents, so should probably focus on those issues while the PR house focuses on putting together national legislation etc. Then the FPTP house has to ratify it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Nope. Not for not doing what I think. For carrying on believing that a bunch of people who treat them like second class citizens and who's ideology works against their best interests, all because they have a posh sounding voice and/or lots of money.

So they are stupid for not seeing through it? Explain how say a car worker at JLR will personally be better off himself if Sir Starmer runs the country?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
So they are stupid for not seeing through it? Explain how say a car worker at JLR will personally be better off himself if Sir Starmer runs the country?
Well for a start, he's far less likely to cut corporation tax under some nonsense belief that it leads to job creation, resulting in a cut to services they use and/or an increase in their personal tax/NI/VAT to cover it.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Well for a start, he's far less likely to cut corporation tax under some nonsense belief that it leads to job creation, resulting in a cut to services they use and/or an increase in their personal tax/NI/VAT to cover it.

How much has personal tax for average workers increased exactly?

Will it lower their mortgage costs, allow people to buy a better TV allow people to go on bigger and better holidays and improve the car they drive? Oddly most people couldn’t care less about corporation tax and oh name on labour government that’s created more jobs leaving office than when they took office.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
How much has personal tax for average workers increased exactly?

Will it lower their mortgage costs, allow people to buy a better TV allow people to go on bigger and better holidays and improve the car they drive? Oddly most people couldn’t care less about corporation tax and oh name on labour government that’s created more jobs leaving office than when they took office.

Did you not spot the massive NI hike? It's a personal income tax that hides behind the facade of being a hypothecated tax for the NHS/Care Services but in reality just gets lumped into the pot.

As for lower mortgage costs, did you also not notice the interest rate rise before Christmas? As for buying bigger TV's/holidays price inflation running quite a bit above wage inflation is far from ideal isn't it?
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
Trevor Phillips was very powerful this morning with Dowden.
Very emotional, on point around the distraction this is while several to ten other areas of concern sit in the long grass, and surprise suprise Sue Greys inquiry into party gate to run for a further ten days.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
The comments on the thread about how he “got Brexit done” are great too.
So much for the ‘oven ready’ deal 😂😂😂
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
So they are stupid for not seeing through it? Explain how say a car worker at JLR will personally be better off himself if Sir Starmer runs the country?

I mean by your own admission most voters don't care about policy, don't read the manifesto, and personalities are king.

So yeah that's a pretty stupid way to decide who should run the country in my book. Johnson was clearly picked as an affable clown because he seemed like someone they'd go down the pub with while Corbyn looked like a crusty geography teacher
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
I see the gigafactory at Bagington has finally been approved .
Around 10000 jobs including tertiary suppliers for the local region.
From a practical POV, just as Tollbar gets freed up, won't it all end up a bottleneck again?
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I see the gigafactory at Bagington has finally been approved .
Around 10000 jobs including tertiary suppliers for the local region.
If you believe there will be 10K jobs you'll believe anything. They can't get anyone interested in operating the gigafactory and the council refused requests to make the granting of planning permission conditional on someone being found to operate it.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
Zawahi doing the rounds this morning going hard with the 'Johnson thought it was a work event' line.

And as ever with this scandal, he does it as reports come out that Johnson was warned it was a social event and not to go ahead with it, but ignored the warnings.

I know they're too far in now so it's too late, but why oh why do they keep lying about stuff when they know there are more details to come out, details than can prove them wrong?
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
if those comments are true then everyone of the people who made them is a fucking moron. What the fuck did the expect his tenure was going to turn out like?

Makes you angry reading some of those. They're surprised that Johnson has done exactly the same things he's been doing his whole life. If some of those people genuinely thought the things they did about him at election time then it shows just how little attention and research people put into casting a vote. I bet they put more thought into who they vote for on Strictly.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top