Keep going. You actually I think believe people will look at specifics - no they won’t they see one privileged twat with a cake and another privileged twat with a Biryani no doubt paid on expenses
That’s what the average non Parisian voter sees - keep going it’s a great deflection - all Starmer does is whine he had something to eat and that’s all people are seeing from him - I doubt he’s going hungry
I can see now why you think Dan Hodges is 'excellent'.
And I can see why as you live your life via twitter you actually have zero idea how people think
I'm no royalist, but be careful what you wish for.Surely, next day delivery by 9.00am would have been cheaper.
The day we become a Republic can't come soon enough.
Says the man with nearly 70,000 posts on a forum
Which again is irrelevant because all you offer is twitter links and sound bytes. You have zero political knowledge you have zero insight - it’s a binary thought process and the day spent linking irrelevant people to support that view
Its too simplistic
You're right, how can I compete with such political insight as 'no one cares about parties' - which is still headline news, what, 6 months later?
And the polls show a 1% gap in the polls - Tory papers are happy with those headlines - have a little think about that
I'm no royalist, but be careful what you wish for.
At the moment we have an individual who would never use their power because they don't have a mandate from the public. No imagine what someone who did have could do, especially considering the standard of leaders we choose whereby the only thing that seems to matter is personality and charisma. Giving a person like that a huge amoun of power - not for me.
If only there was some recent elections to go on.
Then again, the people from council estates are hard-working, unlike Liz who has been gifted stuff every step of the way through life.
Always exceptions to the rule and given what was said about him in the Brexit negotiations.
Starmer’s final undoing will not be his actions at ‘ Beergate’ but if he continues his ambivalent response to the cost of living crisis.The reality is financially and lifestyle wise Starmer is no threat to me at all. He’s going to support middle class and class aspiration - he doesn’t even have a real labour chancellor to keep some genuine ideals of the party
I think he’s as useless and pointless as Ian Duncan Smith as a leader - he really the more I look at him is absolutely hopeless. He’s got zero ability to engage with people and unlike Blair has the acting ability from an extra in Crossroads
He really made an error in judgement by isolating all those with labour ideology at heart
I admit I can’t stand John McDonnell and his ideology but in an ocean of sameness on both sides he’s a real conviction politician and an intelligent orator. Frankly if I was Starmer I’d stop whining about no where to eat my evening dinner and sack Reeves (she surely is Norman Lamonts love child) and had McDonnell his job back
Labour then would win by a landslide
Starmer’s final undoing will not be his actions at ‘ Beergate’ but if he continues his ambivalent response to the cost of living crisis.
Doing the same things expecting different results. It’s austerity by stealth. Didn’t work last time so won’t work this time. All austerity does is stifle growth. They seriously can’t have forgotten this.
Queen's Speech: We can't spend our way out of trouble, says PM
Boris Johnson says planned new laws will boost living standards - but critics say families need help now.www.bbc.co.uk
Dan Hodges is having a proper Grenners like breakdown on twitter. He's flailing about that old weirdo Grenners did whenever Biamou scored a goal.
We're about 72 hours from him calling for Kenny Jackett to be made PM
Predicting grenners reply "IRA GERRY ADAMS CIDER WHYCOULDINEVERGET A JOB"
jApparently it was a wind up post. Although it’s become hard to tell the last couple of days as he’s become a parody of himself.
Doing the same things expecting different results. It’s austerity by stealth. Didn’t work last time so won’t work this time. All austerity does is stifle growth. They seriously can’t have forgotten this.
Queen's Speech: We can't spend our way out of trouble, says PM
Boris Johnson says planned new laws will boost living standards - but critics say families need help now.www.bbc.co.uk
Keep going. You actually I think believe people will look at specifics - no they won’t they see one privileged twat with a cake and another privileged twat with a Biryani no doubt paid on expenses
That’s what the average non Parisian voter sees - keep going it’s a great deflection - all Starmer does is whine he had something to eat and that’s all people are seeing from him - I doubt he’s going hungry
You think political parties can expense food to who exactly?
And what the French have to do with anything I’m unsure but assuming you were going for partisan, you’re wrong. It’s mostly Tory voters who think he broke the rules and then only 50% of them.
You think political parties can expense food to who exactly?
And what the French have to do with anything I’m unsure but assuming you were going for partisan, you’re wrong. It’s mostly Tory voters who think he broke the rules and then only 50% of them.
Tell Rachel Reeves that as she appears to be more closely aligned to the orthodoxy behind what Johnson has saidYou can also spend your way out of trouble if you are a Sovereign economy with your own central bank. Basic economic multipliers show you this. It's basic right economic illiteracy. FFS Keynes settled this a long time ago.
Anyone remember when grenners big economic idea was basically internal devaluation. People took great delight in point out just show much that would fuck up an economy that already has a trade imbalance by making British exports even more expensive.
She’s fucking useless.Tell Rachel Reeves that as she appears to be more closely aligned to the orthodoxy behind what Johnson has said
Far too much time spent talking about taxes paying for spending, another dead end street these galaxy brains are going down
you really didn't understand it did you?Tell Rachel Reeves that as she appears to be more closely aligned to the orthodoxy behind what Johnson has said
Far too much time spent talking about taxes paying for spending, another dead end street these galaxy brains are going down
explain what she is wrong about there please?She’s fucking useless.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?