skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I read somewhere that some analysts has been done on who’s signing it and apparently twice as many people have signed it in the US than in the UK.
I read somewhere that some analysts has been done on who’s signing it and apparently twice as many people have signed it in the US than in the UK.Has to be one of those strange Russian accounts
You would think that it would be the exact right time for the Lib Dems to make a real challenge wouldn't you. The Tories in disarray, the Labour party with what many consider a weak leader in charge and them still reeling from the Corbyn years.
You would have thought this would be the perfect opportunity. I don't even know what they stand for right now though.
I know. I just saying this SHOULD be the perfect opportunity for them. They just don't seem to represent much at all though to my mind.Not a chance a Jeremy hunt type leader would regain the seats back
They have no real beliefs or principals
The new leader will focus on ending this unofficial Lib Lab nonsense and target a two horse race
I know. I just saying this SHOULD be the perfect opportunity for them. They just don't seem to represent much at all though to my mind.
A new leader will get some bounce back against Labour and Lib Dem’s - lib dems are a despicable bunch always have been
You can spoil your ballot, but there's no distinction made as to whether it's a protest or just not done correctly.b is an option already
And do you think Johnson was a good Prime Minister?Which candidate do you like best?
Write None of the Above on it thenYou can spoil your ballot, but there's no distinction made as to whether it's a protest or just not done correctly.
'None of the above' is a clear protest vote.
I’d be fearful in johnson’s seat putting wanker as it is most likely to be added to his totalWrite None of the Above on it then
Write None of the Above on it then
9 times out of 10 the counter would assign that to the Tory candidate.There’s only one way to spoil your ballot paper. Draw a spunking cock on it.
That gif never fails to raise a smile. Would love to know what caught Jacketts attention.
And do you think Johnson was a good Prime Minister?
Which candidate do you like best?
The number of times 'inappropriate with' is included is a disgrace.It's an old list but has resurfaced again recently.
Perfectly normal behaviour in a perfectly normal workplace
Fucking ridiculous
A new leader will get some bounce back against Labour and Lib Dem’s - lib dems are a despicable bunch always have been
They will but only the clown has the pull factor needed to con former mining communities into voting Tory a second time.
The funny thing is you say Starmer is a sneerer but you are an identikit version of him. Selected school snob who thinks the working class don’t know what’s good for them
The bigger the lie the bigger the liar required to sell it. Enter the Boris.On the contrary-big lies were told to get people's votes in areas that up to that point the Conservatives didn't bat an eyelid over. Johnson himself said after the election 'now we've actually got to pay attention to the North'. There isn't a better snake oil salesman than him in the party.
The number of times 'inappropriate with' is included is a disgrace.
Same here. My working life stretches over 30 years. I’ve only worked for a handful of companies but have worked with 100’s of people and only witnessed one case of someone being dismissed for inappropriate behaviour or even been accused of such behaviour.Maybe I have worked in a boring industry all my adult life, or perhaps I’m just sheltered from it. But other than the occasional bit of extra martial slap and tickle between probably 2% of the staff I’ve worked alongside every workplace has been pretty vanilla. Whereas in politics it almost seems a pre-requisite than a minimum proportion have to be sex crazed or deviants. Do they have some sort of sex pest Rooney Rule when screening for MPs?
Ironically on most things I really don't and find your views ridiculously binery and simplistic. But on Johnson and Trump there are no shades of grey for me. They were both disastrous but it's interesting you don't feel so.I know you love a bit of binary yes and no but sorry it’s not that straightforward
Maybe I have worked in a boring industry all my adult life, or perhaps I’m just sheltered from it. But other than the occasional bit of extra martial slap and tickle between probably 2% of the staff I’ve worked alongside every workplace has been pretty vanilla. Whereas in politics it almost seems a pre-requisite than a minimum proportion have to be sex crazed or deviants. Do they have some sort of sex pest Rooney Rule when screening for MPs?
I think both have been an unmitigated disaster. Both liars and cheats and only in it for themselves.Ironically on most things I really don't and find your views ridiculously binery and simplistic. But on Johnson and Trump there are no shades of grey for me. They were both disastrous but it's interesting you don't feel so.
Without Trump the abortion issue wouldn't have happened for sure. He left the US that little present. Neither Trump nor Johnson achieved anything of value and they have caused immense suffering, and harm to democracy.I think both have been an unmitigated disaster. Both liars and cheats and only in it for themselves.
I think both have set both countries back a few years.
Without Trump I honestly don't think we would have the Roe vs Wade issue right now.
And Johnson has just created so much distrust amongst politicians and the public alike
But still won't be differentiated from incorrectly filled out forms and thus recorded as a protest vote.Write None of the Above on it then
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?