JAM See
Well-Known Member
Last edited:
Link?Tried to use her position to get off a speeding fine.
Which position?
He certainly doesn’t like being asked about itRishi Sunak refuses to back Suella Braverman after speeding course row
Home Secretary Suella Braverman has been accused of asking civil servants to help her avoid a speeding fine and a driving awareness course alongside other motorists by arranging a private session instead.news.sky.com
Subtext to Sunaks comments - she's the right of the partys poster girl, they've got me by the bollocks, so there's nothing I can do.
It probably was a molehill to be fair. It’s amazing how quickly it’s turned into a mountain though and that’s largely to the parties and in particular Sunak’s response. If she did ask if she could put the fine through on her expenses though that’s something else.I don't know if it was a BBC spin but the way it was described on Radio 5 didn't sound that bad really. I know for a fact a lot of famous people ask about personal driver awareness courses. She wasn't asking to be let off entirely.
YepWait. So saying someone is a liar is unparliamentary language. But saying the love pedos is fine??
Just watched clip and she didn’t quite say Labour loves pedos or mention anything about her brilliant record. Bit naughty from Best for Britain however abhorrent Braverman might be
ps death wish….
View attachment 29865
Always has been their issue though hasn'tit, was why Cameron offered the referendum in the first place! Firstly, thinking it'd be a coalition government again, the Lib Dems would say nope to a referendum,and he could hold his hands up and say he tried... secondly by assuming he'd win the vote and that'd shut them up, but the problem was as he wasn't expecting to have to actually put the vote out there, he ended up with a bloody stupid question that was sure to cause division unless it came back with a yes, and even then a close yes would have fired up Farage and co. so probably wouldn't have helped either!Brexit was supposed to destroy Labour for a generation, it’s looking more and more like it’s going to cause the Tories to implode.
HimmlerAlways has been their issue though hasn'tit, was why Cameron offered the referendum in the first place! Firstly, thinking it'd be a coalition government again, the Lib Dems would say nope to a referendum,and he could hold his hands up and say he tried... secondly by assuming he'd win the vote and that'd shut them up, but the problem was as he wasn't expecting to have to actually put the vote out there, he ended up with a bloody stupid question that was sure to cause division unless it came back with a yes, and even then a close yes would have fired up Farage and co. so probably wouldn't have helped either!
Still, as they go more hardline each time, who the hell's next for Home Secretary if Braverman does go?
Himmler
Latest poling has only 9% of brits think brexit has gone well and only 20% of leavers think it has gone well. Said a long time ago that brexit would end up being to the Tories what the Iraq war was to Labour and Boris would be held in the same regard as Blair. Every time there’s a poll on Brexit that prediction looks closer and closer.Yeah in classic online style I didn’t watch the clip. Have done now and just says they voted against tougher sentences which is standard hillocks TBF.
Ahahahaha. Brexit was supposed to destroy Labour for a generation, it’s looking more and more like it’s going to cause the Tories to implode. Hard core political ideology: not even once.
Too moderate for NatCHimmler
Latest poling has only 9% of brits think brexit has gone well and only 20% of leavers think it has gone well. Said a long time ago that brexit would end up being to the Tories what the Iraq war was to Labour and Boris would be held in the same regard as Blair. Every time there’s a poll on Brexit that prediction looks closer and closer.
If this zombie government pissed off and called an election let's find outTime for a party to want to give us a referendum to rejoin would you say
Time for a party to want to give us a referendum to rejoin would you say
That’s the other issue. Rejoining could mean that brexits legacy is a commitment to join the Euro. Not sure how strict that commitment is though. Sweden had a referendum on it and voted against joining the Euro and although they didn’t obtain a veto on committing to joining the Euro like us and Denmark from everything I’ve read about the Sweden referendum it is basically a de facto veto because despite everything project fear… err, I mean the leave campaign said on matters such as this the nations law is sovereign.Or just rejoin cos referenda are fucking dumb. You’d have to negotiate any rejoin deal before it could be voted on anyway. For me: rejoin as we were? Of course but never going to happen. Join the Euro and lose out veto? Lot harder to call.
That’s the other issue. Rejoining could mean that brexits legacy is a commitment to join the Euro. Not sure how strict that commitment is though. Sweden had a referendum on it and voted against joining the Euro and although they didn’t obtain a veto on committing to joining the Euro like us and Denmark from everything I’ve read about the Sweden referendum it is basically a de facto veto because despite everything project fear… err, I mean the leave campaign said on matters such as this the nations law is sovereign.
Yeah, it does seem that the long term legacy of Brexit could mean Britain (well, probably England by that time) being even closer in the EU than before.That’s the other issue. Rejoining could mean that brexits legacy is a commitment to join the Euro. Not sure how strict that commitment is though. Sweden had a referendum on it and voted against joining the Euro and although they didn’t obtain a veto on committing to joining the Euro like us and Denmark from everything I’ve read about the Sweden referendum it is basically a de facto veto because despite everything project fear… err, I mean the leave campaign said on matters such as this the nations law is sovereign.
If a condition of rejoining the EU was joining the Euro it should be an absolute no from anybody, regardless of how they voted. Currency sovereignty is too important.
Yeah. I've got no problem with a no for if it was you must join the Euro within X years, anyway. A vague aspiration to join when conditions are acceptable is another matter however, as that's just soft soap bollocks to appease other countries.Pity we left when currency sovereignty was respected then
Pity we left when currency sovereignty was respected then
What's changed and does that not indicate that a lot of the suspicions about the EU (ever closer union) are or were well-founded?
What’s changed is that we left when we had special exemptions like that and now if we try to rejoin they can dictate the terms. This is the problem when you decide to flip off most of the continent.
Should have thought about that before you voted leave in the first place.If a condition of rejoining the EU was joining the Euro it should be an absolute no from anybody, regardless of how they voted. Currency sovereignty is too important.
Should have thought about that before you voted leave in the first place.
So the reason is spite?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?