Do you want to discuss boring politics? (23 Viewers)

Grendel

Well-Known Member
So you agree everyone should vote Labour. Good stuff.

No I’m not I’m saying it’s a likely outcome

So In 2019 you admit we should have voted for Boris Johnson? Good stuff.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
This is all the orthodoxy that the former BoE understander of macroeconomics shadow chancellor is trained in. She has never once disputed that the rates should go up just that the government should mitigate against it.

Is it time to remove the 'independence' and put the government of the day back in control and make them fully accountable given how much interest rates affect people?
You seem to have missed the without support for those effected part of what I said.

Rate hikes are pretty much the only monetary policy the BoE can take but there needs to be support as well so people don't lose their homes.

It's worrying now even though food inflation etc is starting to go down underlying inflation is heading in the wrong direction.
 

duffer

Well-Known Member
Frankly the who is going to vote for who and why argument is boring now. Labour are barring a miracle going to win quite comfortably next year.

What concerns me is the fact that the government and BoE are purposefully pushing the economy in to recession (by removing disposable income from the economy, that's what rate hikes are designed to do) and they are doing it without any plan or support to help people.

It's absolute madness

It's the old, if the only tool you've got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, thing.

If the government really wants to take money out of the economy then I suspect there are fairer and quicker mechanisms than raising interest rates (which have an inbuilt lag on inflation reduction anyway, I believe).

Maybe a penny or two on the higher rates of income tax, higher VAT on non-essential items, government backed high interest rate savings accounts.

A quicker way to drive down cost-push inflation, which is really where this started, might be price control on utilities - those who can't bear to see their dividends cut if profits are reduced can always hand their business back to the country.

All mho of course, but there has to be a better way than simply driving the country back into recession and austerity.
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
It's the old, if the only tool you've got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, thing.

If the government really wants to take money out of the economy then I suspect there are fairer and quicker mechanisms than raising interest rates (which have an inbuilt lag on inflation reduction anyway, I believe).

Maybe a penny or two on the higher rates of income tax, higher VAT on non-essential items, government backed high interest rate savings accounts.

A quicker way to drive down cost-push inflation, which is really where this started, might be price control on utilities - those who can't bear to see their dividends cut if profits are reduced can always hand their business back to the country.

All mho of course, but there has to be a better way than simply driving the country back into recession and austerity.
yes, there are fiscal methods that can and should be looked at but the government don't want to do this as they seem to think it would be a sign od economic weakness.

the BoE can only effect monetary policy so in the absence of any fiscal action they are going to take action like this. it's their remit
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It's the old, if the only tool you've got is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail, thing.

If the government really wants to take money out of the economy then I suspect there are fairer and quicker mechanisms than raising interest rates (which have an inbuilt lag on inflation reduction anyway, I believe).

Maybe a penny or two on the higher rates of income tax, higher VAT on non-essential items, government backed high interest rate savings accounts.

A quicker way to drive down cost-push inflation, which is really where this started, might be price control on utilities - those who can't bear to see their dividends cut if profits are reduced can always hand their business back to the country.

All mho of course, but there has to be a better way than simply driving the country back into recession and austerity.

Sunak is allergic to raising taxes though, and even if he wasn’t the backbenchers would eat him alive.

But yeah, would be better to target restrictions on those who can afford it rather than making average wage people lose their house.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Sunak is allergic to raising taxes though, and even if he wasn’t the backbenchers would eat him alive.

But yeah, would be better to target restrictions on those who can afford it rather than making average wage people lose their house.

he has raised taxes
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Sunak is allergic to raising taxes though, and even if he wasn’t the backbenchers would eat him alive.

But yeah, would be better to target restrictions on those who can afford it rather than making average wage people lose their house.

I could imagine the national uproar if he raised personal taxes in the middle of a cost of living crisis though ! Remember after NI was rightly increased to pay for social care.

Agree with Duffer that the problem with rate rises is the lag. It’s not just aimed at mortgages though, it businesses and people looking to borrow etc. It should ultimately cool the economy, however, I personally think they’ve ended up going too far now due to them trying to make up for previous mistakes and raising rates too slowly to begin with

It’s national bank group think. They’ve all edged up even though our inflation is different to USAs inflation. We know there’s a lag so they should’ve raised rates higher more quickly (front load) ? On top of the fact that they shouldn’t have carried on printing during and after a supply side shock (pandemic/ lockdowns) and should’ve raised rates/stopped QE sooner. Andy Haldine (former chief economist at BoE) advised this back in June 2021 !

Edit - central banks not national banks 😊
 
Last edited:

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
The interest rate hike (and probably the previous 12) just seem like an overreaction to me. Low interest rates didn’t drive inflation and I struggle to se what impact raising the interest rates has had on reducing it. Seems to me it’s a combination of the B word, the war in Ukraine and the echoes of the pandemic all turbo charged the ridiculous Truss and Kwasi era that are driving it not people having too much money to spank because they’re being paid too much. I don’t know anyone who wasn’t cutting back prior to Trussonomics. I don’t know anyone who’s not had real term pay cuts over the last couple of years. I know plenty of people who saved during 2020 but are now giving their savings away corporations registering record profits to have some resemblance of living the life they have become accustomed too full of luxuries like eating, heating and wearing clothes.

As one pundit put it, what does the Bank of England expect to achieve that it didn’t achieve the previous 12 times. Then there’s the issue of debt, it’s now over 100% of the country’s GDP. People will and have said it doesn’t matter. Okay, let’s put our rising debt to GDP into some sort of context we’re not that far behind where Greece was in 2008, within a year it was 127%, currently it’s about 175%. Yes yes I know Japan is 225% but our economy is nearer in makeup to Greece than Japan. I think we’re so close to doing a Greece it’s not funny, we’re un-investable especially to our traditional trading partners in the EU (big story in Germany today) which has a knock on effect to how the rest of the world sees us.

The government needs to make the country attractive to invest to stimulate the economy. Interest rate rises isn’t going to do that, not for the average man in the street. The richest will of course get richer, they always do, as we witnessed in the pandemic, especially with a compliant government, which they have.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
I could imagine the national uproar if he raised personal taxes in the middle of a cost of living crisis though ! Remember after NI was rightly increased to pay for social care.

Agree with Duffer that the problem with rate rises is the lag. It’s not just aimed at mortgages though, it businesses and people looking to borrow etc. It should ultimately cool the economy, however, I personally think they’ve ended up going too far now due to them trying to make up for previous mistakes and raising rates too slowly to begin with

It’s national bank group think. They’ve all edged up even though our inflation is different to USAs inflation. We know there’s a lag so they should’ve raised rates higher more quickly ? On top of the fact that they shouldn’t have carried on printing during and after a supply side shock (pandemic/ lockdowns) and should’ve raised rates/stopped QE sooner. Andy Haldine (former chief economist at BoE) advised this back in June 2021 !

I think it’s madness we tie mortgage rates to BoE base rate TBH. It’s just for the benefit of the banks. Offer state backed 30 year fixed rate mortgages and watch them fly off the shelves and suddenly you’ve not got a random inflation tax that leaves the wealthy alone.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
Remember after NI was rightly increased to pay for social care.
There was nothing right about that at all. The only reason it was broken was because of the failed Tory policy of austerity, Boris was then elected on a manifesto that had a plan (allegedly) to fix it hand in hand with a pledge to not raise taxes or NI.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
There was nothing right about that at all. The only reason it was broken was because of the failed Tory policy of austerity, Boris was then elected on a manifesto that had a plan (allegedly) to fix it hand in hand with a pledge to not raise taxes or NI.

We need more cash for social care as we’re living longer, ultimately this should probably come from either income tax or NI. I think NI gets capped in which case they should amend this. Nobody wants to make tough decisions anymore so we just constantly kick the can
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
I wonder how many top rate income tax earners would take an income tax rise vs more increases in the interest rate? There’s a misconception that all top income rate tax payers are gazillionaires so somehow immune (in context average earners) to interest rate hikes. Not true in many possibly the majority of cases, there’s no shortage of stories flying around about high earners struggling/failing to meet their mortgage obligations because they’re mortgaged up to the hilt like most working people. A tax rise might be more acceptable hit to many compared to interest rates going up and up. Probably benefit the government and wider economy more too.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
We need more cash for social care as we’re living longer, ultimately this should probably come from either income tax or NI. I think NI gets capped in which case they should amend this. Nobody wants to make tough decisions anymore so we just constantly kick the can
But that wasn’t the platform they were elected on, they had a costed plan apparently.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
But that wasn’t the platform they were elected on, they had a costed plan apparently.

They could’ve justifiably argued post pandemic they needed to break certain commitments/promises. I personally didn’t think they should’ve had that in their manifiesto, however, they bottled it after May fucked the previous election. At least she was honest with the electorate about the problem and tried to provide a solution (the maturely renamed dementia tax) however unpalatable it might be for some.

We live in a country where most people just aren’t willing to pay more tax though, even if it’s for the greater good
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
We live in a country where most people just aren’t willing to pay more tax though, even if it’s for the greater good
That's been a cultural shift over a (relatively!) recent period, though. Two world wars focussed peoples' minds over what was important, then we had a shift with no such thing as society etc.
 

PVA

Well-Known Member
It's just ridiculous.

Bad enough being duped in 2016, even worse still thinking it's a good idea.

Although granted those people are now in the minority.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Spot the difference

84709690b66818fdd7ed59bcde86593d.jpg


Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
Indeed, fuck them. If they are intending on "improving the economy" I'm sure reducing the spending power of millions of people is the right way to go about it.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk

Nandy was on the Keunsberg show this morning and admitted she thought that the interest rise was the right thing to do to stem inflation - it’s strange for an opposition whose clearly going to win to not have alternate and at least a bit radical outlook
 

David O'Day

Well-Known Member
It’s an odd strategy to piss off huge chunks of your core vote while saying you would do nothing different to the current disaster of a government
The real story is different to what that tweet says. No one has said they will not give 6.5% or any other % increase. All they have said is that they will not just automatically rubbered stamp anything which is fair to me.

But that's a not a snappy tweet

But it's pointless arguing with the morons who are so entrenched in their views they will post tweets without actually looking into the full story
 

Ian1779

Well-Known Member
The real story is different to what that tweet says. No one has said they will not give 6.5% or any other % increase. All they have said is that they will not just automatically rubbered stamp anything which is fair to me.

But that's a not a snappy tweet

But it's pointless arguing with the morons who are so entrenched in their views they will post tweets without actually looking into the full story
It’s not though is it. Teachers pay has gone down in real terms for years and years.

Now they say they won’t even sign off on an independent body’s recommendation (which is again way below any kind of real terms pay rise)

But it’s us that are the problem - maybe time to face facts that you’ve gone all in on a clown and stop embarrassing yourself trying to defend him.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
The real story is different to what that tweet says. No one has said they will not give 6.5% or any other % increase. All they have said is that they will not just automatically rubbered stamp anything which is fair to me.

But that's a not a snappy tweet

But it's pointless arguing with the morons who are so entrenched in their views they will post tweets without actually looking into the full story
All she had to say was that she'd accept an independent pay review body, she didn't. She said exactly the same thing that Sunak did.

Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
Nandy was on the Keunsberg show this morning and admitted she thought that the interest rise was the right thing to do to stem inflation - it’s strange for an opposition whose clearly going to win to not have alternate and at least a bit radical outlook

Not if they don't intend actually changing anything.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top