Just blew me away. It’s all housing wealth but still. I’ve started this fight before but generally speaking pensioners are a very well looked after demographic. Because they vote and every MP will be one one day.
If there’s money going I’d give it to families over pensioners every day TBH. Obviously talking general groups not targeted support.
Just blew me away. It’s all housing wealth but still. I’ve started this fight before but generally speaking pensioners are a very well looked after demographic. Because they vote and every MP will be one one day.
If there’s money going I’d give it to families over pensioners every day TBH. Obviously talking general groups not targeted support.
Saw a stat earlier. 1 in 4 pensioners are millionaires.
That seems somewhat unlikely to me. Where did that come from, can I ask...
It'll be based on property prices.
Lots of pensioners rattling around big old empty nests.
There are plenty of people aged 20-35 who I doubt will be able to afford to buy a house - who’s going to pay their rent when they retire?
Build build build.
Or kill your parents!
Wow really? Not surprisedSaw a stat earlier. 1 in 4 pensioners are millionaires.
Tories and capitalism.In a lot of countries people Rent their whole lives knowing their rent is affordable and their pension more than adequate to cover it when they retire.
Not this country, people are fucked both ways. How did we get in to such a mess?
While they have earned it, they'll have also had conditions that were favourable that you never will. More affordable housing, final salary pensions etc. The post war generation have had it pretty sweet overall in comparison to other generations.Yeah, basically my future is either comfortable or not dependent on whether my parents need nursing care. As a system of wealth creation, that's flawed... and they're not even particularly well off, just careful with money and with only one child. But they earned that, not me.
I haven't earned any of that, though! Likewise if they need nursing care, it's not my fault that others won't and will therefore pass on more to people who aren't me!
While they have earned it, they'll have also had conditions that were favourable that you never will. More affordable housing, final salary pensions etc. The post war generation have had it pretty sweet overall in comparison to other generations.
In a lot of countries people Rent their whole lives knowing their rent is affordable and their pension more than adequate to cover it when they retire.
Not this country, people are fucked both ways. How did we get in to such a mess?
While they have earned it, they'll have also had conditions that were favourable that you never will. More affordable housing, final salary pensions etc. The post war generation have had it pretty sweet overall in comparison to other generations.
'Don't disagree - the issue is an awful lot of people are now invested in it with mortgages, and it wouldn't be popular to wipe £100s of thousands off people's 'wealth', so it won't happen and will be maintained at all costs.Not sure when the mindset that a home was an 'investment' came in - probably from the massive house price growth from the late 90s onwards where people could see a rapidly appreciating asset. As I said in my earlier post, that bubble needs bursting somehow, otherwise we're just going to keep going around the same cycle.
At about that time My cousin, turned down the opportunity to buy his flat for ‘pennies’. His flat was on Tottenham Court Rd.'Don't disagree - the issue is an awful lot of people are now invested in it with mortgages, and it wouldn't be popular to wipe £100s of thousands off people's 'wealth', so it won't happen and will be maintained at all costs.
As a side note, one of my worse decisions was not buying a four bed house in a half decent area of Cov in the mid '90s for £58k. Was working in London at the time, and decided if nobody rented it I'd be shafted. The year or so later I could have sold it and gained myself £150k for the privilege!
Ah well!
'Don't disagree - the issue is an awful lot of people are now invested in it with mortgages, and it wouldn't be popular to wipe £100s of thousands off people's 'wealth', so it won't happen and will be maintained at all costs.
Thing is though, the value of your house goes down by, say, 50%, you're then paying for the privilege of something that's worth substantially less than it was and, in this instance, less than you're paying for it. That tends not to go down well if trying to sell that to voters, that you've needlessly borrowed the money. Nobody's going to let those of us with mortgages off what we owe, after all.Depends where you are on the mortgage, if you're a few years in and still owe 60%+ of the capital + interest, you will still need to pay probably more than the value of the house to realise the asset.
My mortgage is around £220k, house value is roughly £340k (this has increased about 33% in 3 years) Still got 20 years left on current mortgage I think, still got £294k of repayments including interest (currently at £1170 a month) to make based on the current market value on top of a £27k deposit and repayments including interest to date of roughly £40k. How much have prices got to grow for that to be a better investment than money into a steady pension pot?
Stonehouse estate, I told my dad they were overpriced at, what, £12k I think? and to wait until prices came down before buying to let out.I think everyone alive then must have a story. I know a mate who went the other way and made £10k after six months of living with his missus then splitting up.
Of course with my financial luck o found out that when I got a car at 17 (which i promptly crashed) my parents considered buying me a house in Gordon Street in the Butts for the same price. But decided it was a waste of money because they were bound to be slum cleared. Worth about £200k now…
A few friends of mine at the same age are now property landlords courtesy of capital given by their parents. Real life Monopoly for those who can afford itThing is though, the value of your house goes down by, say, 50%, you're then paying for the privilege of something that's worth substantially less than it was and, in this instance, less than you're paying for it. That tends not to go down well if trying to sell that to voters, that you've needlessly borrowed the money. Nobody's going to let those of us with mortgages off what we owe, after all.
It's not about those going forward in terms of winning votes, it's those who are here now you have to convince.
It'll be based on property prices.
Lots of pensioners rattling around big old empty nests.
A lot of people are putting the minimum into their pensions because they simply can't afford more. Then you just get to the lottery of will your parents assets be taken away before they are passed on to you.Given the distribution of wealth, i.e. there are a lot more poor people than rich people, I'd think there will be a lot of smaller (or barely extant) pension pots and a few very big ones. A similar story with house prices. So getting to 25% have over a million seems a stretch to me.
A lot of people are putting the minimum into their pensions because they simply can't afford more. Then you just get to the lottery of will your parents assets be taken away before they are passed on to you.
It really is just luck of the draw, you're hoping your parents have a decent amount of assets in terms of property and you hope that doesn't disappear paying for care costs
Politely, I'd still challenge it. The average pension pot at 65 is £200k, from what I can find. The average house price in the UK is under £300k (ONS figures).
Given the distribution of wealth, i.e. there are a lot more poor people than rich people, I'd think there will be a lot of smaller (or barely extant) pension pots and a few very big ones. A similar story with house prices. So getting to 25% have over a million seems a stretch to me.
In the nicest way, I'd like to see the working before I trusted those figures.
It doesn't change some of the underlying issues of course - I don't know how young people can afford housing these days (I'm struggling myself at the moment, and I definitely ain't young!), but I'm not sure that's an entirely accurate representation.
Politely, I'd still challenge it. The average pension pot at 65 is £200k, from what I can find. The average house price in the UK is under £300k (ONS figures).
Given the distribution of wealth, i.e. there are a lot more poor people than rich people, I'd think there will be a lot of smaller (or barely extant) pension pots and a few very big ones. A similar story with house prices. So getting to 25% have over a million seems a stretch to me.
In the nicest way, I'd like to see the working before I trusted those figures.
It doesn't change some of the underlying issues of course - I don't know how young people can afford housing these days (I'm struggling myself at the moment, and I definitely ain't young!), but I'm not sure that's an entirely accurate representation.
I just did a google......apparently R4 fact checked it recently.... its true (enough)
Not sure when the mindset that a home was an 'investment' came in - probably from the massive house price growth from the late 90s onwards where people could see a rapidly appreciating asset. As I said in my earlier post, that bubble needs bursting somehow, otherwise we're just going to keep going around the same cycle.
Hate to say it, but Brown supporting the housing market during the global crash didn't help either. Would have obviously been painful for those who lost their houses, but that was the time for values to come down, if ever there was.Blairs inertia towards social housing & housebuilding generally.....
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?