I still think it should’ve been put to members back in March, which I think inc no compulsory redundancies until 2025. From memory TSSA put it to members and it was good enough for them.
Each to their own though.
Pretty much not the same deal given that rather large change. Your favoured party once again wasting fortunes to try and win an ideological battle.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Hasn’t every new offer been put to members?I still think it should’ve been put to members back in March, which I think inc no compulsory redundancies until 2025. From memory TSSA put it to members and it was good enough for them.
Each to their own though.
TSSA are mostly back office so the ticket office closures wouldn't of really affected them so what is your point there?I still think it should’ve been put to members back in March, which I think inc no compulsory redundancies until 2025. From memory TSSA put it to members and it was good enough for them.
Each to their own though.
Hasn’t every new offer been put to members?
TSSA are mostly back office so the ticket office closures wouldn't of really affected them so what is your point there?
I think it wasNo. The one mentioned wasn’t
Edit - from memory. It was in relation to National Rail but not rail operators. Might be wrong but think that was the case
I think it was
RMT update on new Network Rail pay offer and referendum
Rail union, RMT will hold a referendum on a new and improved offer from Network Rail on pay and benefits.www.rmt.org.uk
Pretty sure every new offer was put to members. RMT recommended that they didn’t accept every new offer including the current one, members voting this time to accept despite the recommendation from RMT.
Lads, she isn't up for election next time so chill you tits and stop being weird twats who look for reasons to "say oh look at this, why would I blah, blah fucking blah"
Cool, don't vote labour but it seems like most people are so them's the breaks.
I get your point but she’s stepping down at the next election so no one will be voting for either her or a party with her in.Labour lads on here, why the fuck would I vote for a party containing ghouls like this
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Well who's going to be the replacement for her wing?Lads, she isn't up for election next time so chill you tits and stop being weird twats who look for reasons to "say oh look at this, why would I blah, blah fucking blah"
Cool, don't vote labour but it seems like most people are so them's the breaks.
is she fuck Clint she's the past and is rightly standing downShe's the embodiment of the current Labour Party though.
Yes, most people are going to vote for them, the British electorate loves a centre right party.
Not nearly as twatty as some of the skeletons in her closet.Lads, she isn't up for election next time so chill you tits and stop being weird twats who look for reasons to "say oh look at this, why would I blah, blah fucking blah"
Cool, don't vote labour but it seems like most people are so them's the breaks.
Didn’t the government admit that it would have been cheaper to just accede to the union’s original requests instead of carrying on a dispute, but they did the latter for political reasons?Is this pretty much the same deal that wasn’t put to members in Feb/March ? (only change being government U turn over ticket offices?)
Great that its finally over at least, especially in time for Christmas for travellers and employees/members
yeah and she is standing down, still she's never voted toryNot nearly as twatty as some of the skeletons in her closet.
With a past like hers, Margaret Hodge might show a bit more humility
Remember kids, overlooking the behaviour of nonces is fine if you are a sensible grown up politicianyeah and she is standing down, still she's never voted tory
They probably do. I really don't, but if it's a choice between that and an extreme right one I guess I will probably vote for them.She's the embodiment of the current Labour Party though.
Yes, most people are going to vote for them, the British electorate loves a centre right party.
Hancock unsurprisingly getting torn to shreds at the inquiry.
And equally unsurprisingly he's absolutely full of shit and utterly deluded.
Still trying to paint himself as the hero. The c**t should be in prison.
He probably should be but I think it is becoming clear that the ones more deserving of prison are Johnson and most of all Sunak.Hancock unsurprisingly getting torn to shreds at the inquiry.
And equally unsurprisingly he's absolutely full of shit and utterly deluded.
Still trying to paint himself as the hero. The c**t should be in prison.
Lads, she isn't up for election next time so chill you tits and stop being weird twats who look for reasons to "say oh look at this, why would I blah, blah fucking blah"
Cool, don't vote labour but it seems like most people are so them's the breaks.
Still the only vote at the next general electionThere's nothing weird about challenging and highlighting the rapid movement of the Labour party from the centre left to the centre right under Starmer et al.
There are people who get outraged by any criticism of Starmer because they think it might hurt Labour's electoral prospects, but are willing to completely overlook Labour MPs (MPs mind you), working actively to sabotage Labour's chances in the last election. Now that's weird.
If the only reason left for voting Labour is that they're not quite the current iteration of the Tory party, then cool, fill your boots mate. I'd just like to see a party that actually stands for something.
While lunatic far right people like Braverman get senior cabinet roles, it is seen as ‘unelectable’ to do things like support striking union members on picket lines or even just verbally support them.There's nothing weird about challenging and highlighting the rapid movement of the Labour party from the centre left to the centre right under Starmer et al.
There are people who get outraged by any criticism of Starmer because they think it might hurt Labour's electoral prospects, but are willing to completely overlook Labour MPs (MPs mind you), working actively to sabotage Labour's chances in the last election. Now that's weird.
If the only reason left for voting Labour is that they're not quite the current iteration of the Tory party, then cool, fill your boots mate. I'd just like to see a party that actually stands for something.
Still the only vote at the next general election
Then they have a term to show the sort of country they want to realise
Democracy as we all know is the worst form of government except for everything else
There's nothing weird about challenging and highlighting the rapid movement of the Labour party from the centre left to the centre right under Starmer et al.
There are people who get outraged by any criticism of Starmer because they think it might hurt Labour's electoral prospects, but are willing to completely overlook Labour MPs (MPs mind you), working actively to sabotage Labour's chances in the last election. Now that's weird.
If the only reason left for voting Labour is that they're not quite the current iteration of the Tory party, then cool, fill your boots mate. I'd just like to see a party that actually stands for something.
While lunatic far right people like Braverman get senior cabinet roles, it is seen as ‘unelectable’ to do things like support striking union members on picket lines or even just verbally support them.
The point being that the threshold to be called far right by the electorate is much higher than that to be called far left. Sending asylum seekers to Rwanda equals moderate, supporting the right to strike equals communist.One is selected by the PM, the other is selected by the electorate. Happy to help.
Still the only vote at the next general election
Then they have a term to show the sort of country they want to realise
Democracy as we all know is the worst form of government except for everything else
The point being that the threshold to be called far right by the electorate is much higher than that to be called far left. Sending asylum seekers to Rwanda equals moderate, supporting the right to strike equals communist.
The point being that the threshold to be called far right by the electorate is much higher than that to be called far left. Sending asylum seekers to Rwanda equals moderate, supporting the right to strike equals communist.
Hmmm.Braverman is disliked by 41% of the electorate. She is frequently called far right.
Hmmm.
Corbyn’s hard-Left vision for Britain is close to reality – thanks to the Tories
Governments under Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak have embraced policies first seen in a Labour manifestowww.telegraph.co.uk
That's actually quite a scary figure as it suggests 59% either like her or don't care!Braverman is disliked by 41% of the electorate. She is frequently called far right.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?