And clearly feels sure that the government in waiting has politics he's comfortable withClearly worked out who’s gonna be driving the gravy train going forward.
WtafWho's this bloke?
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Clearly worked out who’s gonna be driving the gravy train going forward.
Reverse engineeringWorth a read of this if you’re wondering about Starmers priorities when trying to get elected, voter concerns about Labour:
View attachment 33875
He says ‘don’t know’ way more than 5% of the timeWorth a read of this if you’re wondering about Starmers priorities when trying to get elected, voter concerns about Labour:
View attachment 33875
Reverse engineering
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Go on
It was probably the wrong term.
It's a depressing way to go about a campaign - now what can Labour do but what do I want it not to do or look like? Which of those points are they actually focusing on apart from "I worry they will borrow and spend too much"
Worth a read of this if you’re wondering about Starmers priorities when trying to get elected, voter concerns about Labour:
View attachment 33875
I'm confused. What was the sample and where was it drawn from?
And secondly, what did it tell us that we don't already know, i.e. that Starmer doesn't have a single principle, pledge, or promise, that he won't abandon in search of a vote (or a tick in the box from a focus group).
The man's not a leader, he's a weather-vane - he blows with the wind.
Stand by for more austerity, more cruelty, more inequality, just with a thin veneer of competence and a red tie.
It’s an effective way though. Point is we should all be aware of quite how fringe our own hobby horses are to an organisation trying to get votes. Rightly it not three times as many people care about over spending than Palestine. Which you wouldn’t grok from reading left wing commentary.
It is currently effective. I'm not sure how such a lack of depth is going to serve his first term as people just see themselves getting poorer and services continuing to decline.
Always a chance it's been clipped to get more headlines but the PM having a £1000 charity bet with a broadcaster about whether he'll send any immigrants to Rwanda feels.....off
I think we should do this for every policy. Exam grades down? Gillian Keegan has to swim in a bath of beans. Trains late? Mark Harper has to personally refund all passengers.
Bit of accountability is what politics needs.
In all seriousness a multi millionaire making £1k charity bets as he presides over a cost of living crisis is very off.
It begs the question as to why he's involved in politics
Always a chance it's been clipped to get more headlines but the PM having a £1000 charity bet with a broadcaster about whether he'll send any immigrants to Rwanda feels.....off
It begs the question as to why he's involved in politics
In which case what is the point of the party? We seem to have moved to a Republican/Democrat system of far right and centre right optionsHe has - I suppose rather cleverly - has decided moderate conservatism is a way to secure a long term stay in government as essentially the middle class and successful working class voters are the key.
He can easily finish the Tory Party for good by offering an economic strategy that benefits those that matter
He is essentially a John Major style conservative and Reeves is his Lamont.
I don’t know why Shmmeee finds it funny as he is - as many now agree - a Major type Conservative who no longer cares about core Labour values
In which case what is the point of the party? We seem to have moved to a Republican/Democrat system of far right and centre right options
Imposing minimum service levels on striking teachersDefine “right”
Imposing minimum service levels on striking teachers
I'm confused. What was the sample and where was it drawn from?
And secondly, what did it tell us that we don't already know, i.e. that Starmer doesn't have a single principle, pledge, or promise, that he won't abandon in search of a vote (or a tick in the box from a focus group).
The man's not a leader, he's a weather-vane - he blows with the wind.
Stand by for more austerity, more cruelty, more inequality, just with a thin veneer of competence and a red tie.
How on Earth is undermining the right to strike a left wing idea? And education is a great example, academisation has turned it into a privately run but state funded enterprise where anyone can apply to set up a school.Sounds pretty left wing to me. Right wing govt would remove all regulation on education and let it be a race to the bottom, no?
So you are just using it to mean “does stuff i disagree with”
How on Earth is undermining the right to strike a left wing idea? And education is a great example, academisation has turned it into a privately run but state funded enterprise where anyone can apply to set up a school.
Laugh all you want but it seems to mean “doesn’t always agree with me”
A government promising spending and tax raises isn’t right wing by any stretch of the imagination. The same goes in the US BTW where Biden has been more progressive than most.
You appear to be conflating being left wing with being authoritarianRegulating individual actions with government legislation is the very definition of left wing.
I agree about academisation
Sounds pretty left wing to me. Right wing govt would remove all regulation on education and let it be a race to the bottom, no?
So you are just using it to mean “does stuff i disagree with”
Always a chance it's been clipped to get more headlines but the PM having a £1000 charity bet with a broadcaster about whether he'll send any immigrants to Rwanda feels.....off
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?