I think it's a personally disorderWoman should be studied for her congenital lack of shame.
Mea culpa!You're breaking SBT convention with this sort of stunt actually
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
I don't understand this point of view at all, it's an absolute failure to understand how foreign policy works.
We were involved at the start of this whole mess when Israel was established, we've got a seat on the UN security council and hence a permanent veto on their resolutions, we trade with Israel and with other countries directly affected, we sell arms to Israel, and our shipping is under attack in the Middle East because of our seeming support for Israel.
Politely, it's a nonsense to claim that what we say either as a government or as a potential government, makes no difference. It absolutely does, both domestically and internationally.
That this House believes that an Israeli ground offensive in Rafah risks catastrophic humanitarian consequences and therefore must not take place; notes the intolerable loss of Palestinian life, the majority being women and children;
condemns the terrorism of Hamas who continue to hold hostages;
supports Australia, Canada and New Zealand’s calls for Hamas to release and return all hostages and for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire, which means an immediate stop to the fighting and a ceasefire that lasts and is observed by all sides, noting that Israel cannot be expected to cease fighting if Hamas continues with violence and that Israelis have the right to the assurance that the horror of 7th October cannot happen again;
therefore supports diplomatic mediation efforts to achieve a lasting ceasefire; demands that rapid and unimpeded humanitarian relief is provided in Gaza;
demands an end to settlement expansion and violence; urges Israel to comply with the International Court of Justice’s provisional measures;
calls for the UN Security Council to be meet urgently;
and urges all international partners to work together to establish a diplomatic process to deliver the peace of a two-state solution, with a safe and secure Israel alongside a viable Palestinian state, including working with international partners to recognise a Palestinian state as a contribution to rather than outcome of that process, because statehood is the inalienable right of the Palestinian people and not in the gift of any neighbour.
Ban US social media until we figure out what the hell is going on.
Mitigation, get out of these excuses!Nothing the UK says it does is going to stop us being seen as the west by Houthi rebels. Nothing we do is going to change the direction of this war outside of direct negotiations that won’t be helped by setting our position out in public.
This week is entirely about election positioning. The SNP against Labour, Tories stirring that up, Labour against Labour, the Tories stirring that up.
Meanwhile this is the terrible genocidal statement you’re all up in arms about:
Mitigation, get out of these excuses!
Whether we put a statement out asking for an immediate ceasefire or and immediate humanitarian ceasefire is not a good use of parliaments time. The house has made its feelings clear, everyone got a vote.
Nothing the UK says it does is going to stop us being seen as the west by Houthi rebels. Nothing we do is going to change the direction of this war outside of direct negotiations that won’t be helped by setting our position out in public.
This week is entirely about election positioning. The SNP against Labour, Tories stirring that up, Labour against Labour, the Tories stirring that up.
Meanwhile this is the terrible genocidal statement you’re all up in arms about:
How about our own media?Ban US social media until we figure out what the hell is going on
Now I'm afraid you're making stuff up. Can you tell me, for example, which way Penny Morduant voted. Stephen Kelly?
I'm honestly staggered that you think there's something more important than our government trying to have some influence on one of the biggest humanitarian crises of our times. Should we focus more on potholes, perhaps?
Isn’t the point that it’s all kind of semantics in terms of the wording of the motion and amendments. Purely politics as shmmee suggested and most of what I’m hearing in the media agree.
Yes precisely.
The end result was a motion passed calling for a ceasefire. Which is apparently what everyone wanted.
Anything else about a particular wording was simply political games.
SNPs and Tories threw their toys out the pram despite claiming to want a ceasefire. Which shows they wanted to trap Labour, failed, and now look stupid arguing over the thing they claim to want so badly.
Yes precisely.
The end result was a motion passed calling for a ceasefire. Which is apparently what everyone wanted.
Anything else about a particular wording was simply political games.
SNPs and Tories threw their toys out the pram despite claiming to want a ceasefire. Which shows they wanted to trap Labour, failed, and now look stupid arguing over the thing they claim to want so badly.
Now I'm afraid you're making stuff up. Can you tell me, for example, which way Penny Morduant voted. Stephen Kelly?
I'm honestly staggered that you think there's something more important than our government trying to have some influence on one of the biggest humanitarian crises of our times. Should we focus more on potholes, perhaps?
This whole thing is nothing but political positioning for domestic voters.
Yet Starmer spoke to the Israeli President prior to the vote and had Hoyle pull an unprecedented stunt to ensure a phrase in the SNP motion never made it to light.
That's a lot of effort for a bit of domestic political positioning.
Ooof!Hoyle intended all votes to happen, SMp and Tories sabotaged that so they could have a moan because their plan was to stop Labour. It’s literally just the side whose political machinations didn’t work complaining and people like you with a disposition to back Tories over Starmer buying it hook line and sinker.
And yes. I imagine as a future PM he has spoken to the people involved. That’s his job and what’s actually likely to make a difference not arguing over wording of a statement literally no one is going to pay any attention to and only exists to inflame/resolve internal Labour politics.
Ooof!
Election year. No playing now. If you spend all your energy making things up to be mad at Starmer about I’ll assume you’re a dyed in the wool Tory.
@shmmeee accusing @clint van damme of being a dyed in the wool Tory.Election year. No playing now. If you spend all your energy making things up to be mad at Starmer about I’ll assume you’re a dyed in the wool Tory.
Election year. No playing now. If you spend all your energy making things up to be mad at Starmer about I’ll assume you’re a dyed in the wool Tory.
Hoyle intended all votes to happen, SMp and Tories sabotaged that so they could have a moan because their plan was to stop Labour. It’s literally just the side whose political machinations didn’t work complaining and people like you with a disposition to back Tories over Starmer buying it hook line and sinker.
And yes. I imagine as a future PM he has spoken to the people involved. That’s his job and what’s actually likely to make a difference not arguing over wording of a statement literally no one is going to pay any attention to and only exists to inflame/resolve internal Labour politics.
What's made up?
Maniac!Sudden concern for parliamentary procedure, pretending the LOTO talking to world leaders is evidence of some Jewish conspiracy, misrepresenting Labours position on absolutely everything to try and make out they’re no different to Tories, I could go on.
Since 2019 the left on here have been closer to Grendel than the centre left.
Look at this shit FFS:
View attachment 34228
You are what you do and yes if you spend all your energy trying to keep the Tories in power through ludicrous misinformation I will assume you are a Tory.
Omfg they actually suspended him hahahah I’m flabbergastedAbsolutely wild anti-semitism from Lee Anderson - surely he’ll have the whip removed now?
Omfg they actually suspended him hahahah I’m flabbergasted
Well, if that is the end of Anderson’s political career it’s an ending that was as predictable as it was inevitable. A thoroughly horrible little man and a poor excuse for a human being. Gigantic snowflake too.
Not racist enoughFirst Reform MP I reckon.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?