I also see the desire to shore up the fossil fuel industry and hamper renewables is still in full swing.
Why would you cap revenues just for green energy and nuclear when at the same time using public funds to prop up the excessive profits of fossil fuel energy? If it's a policy do it across the board. Why just specifically choose those ones? Because their costs aren't rising at the same level as gas costs? hasn't stopped them using it for traditional energy and electric generation up to now has it?
If you believe in the free market why link it to another other form of energy? It goes totally against the whole concept. If they can produce cheaper they can offer the product cheaper. Competition will then develop which will drive prices down. So either they don't believe in that at all, or they're deliberately sabotaging it to protect fossil fuels.
They been totally against taxing those excessive profits of the big energy firms as it's interfering, but it's absolute fine to limit revenues? Even though that revenue may be being done much less profitably or prevent further investment into renewables and wean us off fossil fuels and give us the energy independence they claim to crave.
It absolutely stinks, and yet they've got the balls to claim they care about the environment.