Do you want to discuss boring politics? (32 Viewers)

ProfessorbyGrace

Well-Known Member
Vaughn Gething is set to resign after a controversial and ‘rudderless’ tenure as Welsh First Minister.

Lovely to see more issues and self-serving politicians bickering amongst themselves, dramatically.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
It must be. For starters she obviously thinks she’s still relevant and has an opinion people want to hear. She couldn’t even retain her safe seat at the GE.

I genuinely think she is and if so someone close to her needs to get her out of the public eye and get her some help.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
As I said the other day, mental issues



Talking of nutters I just heard Andrew Ramsey joint leader of the greens on the radio, what a shambles. firstly, thinking re-nationalising energy, rail and water would only cost £30bn and then trying to defend his position on delaying/blocking the new grid pylon route through east anglia which is required for new offshore wind farms

I appreciate he’s representing his constituency but he’s leader of the Green Party FFS….and in any event that constituency voted for the Greens so if anyone should suck it up it’s surely them !
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
Why is Rishi Sunak coming across as quite pleasant *after* he's lost the election? It's a bit late now!
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
The break from all the culture war bollocks has been a breath of fresh air.
Kind of makes me want him to stay on as leader - this is a bit more the Sunak I'd hoped we'd get as leader, not one who bowed to the reactionary nutters. Lets face it, his politics would always be unlikely to be mine, but at least he's slightly pragmatic with it!
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Kind of makes me want him to stay on as leader - this is a bit more the Sunak I'd hoped we'd get as leader, not one who bowed to the reactionary nutters. Lets face it, his politics would always be unlikely to be mine, but at least he's slightly pragmatic with it!

He’s a decent bloke and the best they’ve got as leader. Wrong time though
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Im sure some oil companies will do that.

Someone has to leave oil in the ground, why not us?
We’re not really helping to achieve net zero if all we’re doing is exporting out carbon emissions. Usually importing fossil fuels that are a) more carbon intensive and b) there’s a cost to transporting coal from Argentina, for example.

It’s like a lot of EVs, the initial outlay of carbon is usually higher than petrol/diesel cars and the cars need to last 5-10 years to actually break even on CO2 emissions. How many people (especially those that can afford EVs) keep the same car for 5+ years?
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
We’re not really helping to achieve net zero if all we’re doing is exporting out carbon emissions. Usually importing fossil fuels that are a) more carbon intensive and b) there’s a cost to transporting coal from Argentina, for example.

It’s like a lot of EVs, the initial outlay of carbon is usually higher than petrol/diesel cars and the cars need to last 5-10 years to actually break even on CO2 emissions. How many people (especially those that can afford EVs) keep the same car for 5+ years?
Much as I hate to say this, it doesn’t matter how long the initial purchaser keeps a new EV as long as it continues to be used by someone until the CO2 break even point is reached.

Does importing carbon fuels actually reduce our CO2 footprint? I don’t think so, in fact the CO2 produced by transporting those fuels to the UK will add to it which is why it seems madness to block new sources until the replacements are proven and well in their way.(Someoen will be along shortly to tell me the global oil market doesn’t work like that),

Having everything made in China reduces UK footprint by exporting our carbon emissions. Having unprecedented population growth will have increased our CO2 emissions.
 

Mucca Mad Boys

Well-Known Member
Much as I hate to say this, it doesn’t matter how long the initial purchaser keeps a new EV as long as it continues to be used by someone until the CO2 break even point is reached.

Does importing carbon fuels actually reduce our CO2 footprint? I don’t think so, in fact the CO2 produced by transporting those fuels to the UK will add to it which is why it seems madness to block new sources until the replacements are proven and well in their way.(Someoen will be along shortly to tell me the global oil market doesn’t work like that),

Having everything made in China reduces UK footprint by exporting our carbon emissions. Having unprecedented population growth will have increased our CO2 emissions.
That’s assuming the EV’s batteries last up to that. A friend of mine who’s a keen environmentalist pointed out that a newly released JLR EV needed something like 210k miles on one battery to ‘break even’ and the batteries will not last that long, especially as the range on EVs wanes pretty rapidly from what I’ve been told.

That is one example, but paints a picture that car manufacturers are greenwashing their products.

In a practical sense, if there was an event where the power grid is impacted, EVs quickly become useless.

EVs are potentially part of the solution to decarbonising car transportation, my instinct is that we need some sort of breakthrough with biofuels to be able to move away from fossil fuels.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
That’s assuming the EV’s batteries last up to that. A friend of mine who’s a keen environmentalist pointed out that a newly released JLR EV needed something like 210k miles on one battery to ‘break even’ and the batteries will not last that long, especially as the range on EVs wanes pretty rapidly from what I’ve been told.

That is one example, but paints a picture that car manufacturers are greenwashing their products.

In a practical sense, if there was an event where the power grid is impacted, EVs quickly become useless.

EVs are potentially part of the solution to decarbonising car transportation, my instinct is that we need some sort of breakthrough with biofuels to be able to move away from fossil fuels.
Isn't that the way our owner is going? Then you have the argument that we need the Fields for food!
Hydrogen for me!!
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
That’s assuming the EV’s batteries last up to that. A friend of mine who’s a keen environmentalist pointed out that a newly released JLR EV needed something like 210k miles on one battery to ‘break even’ and the batteries will not last that long, especially as the range on EVs wanes pretty rapidly from what I’ve been told.

That is one example, but paints a picture that car manufacturers are greenwashing their products.

In a practical sense, if there was an event where the power grid is impacted, EVs quickly become useless.

EVs are potentially part of the solution to decarbonising car transportation, my instinct is that we need some sort of breakthrough with biofuels to be able to move away from fossil fuels.
I don't like EV cars at all. I look forward to there being no parking when 60s multi storeys are closed because they will not bear the weight, potholes have multiplied for the same reason and Londoners have respiratory problems from inhaling the additional brake dust and rubber particles. Just Stop Lithium will be out in force. The folly will then have been proved.

Biofuels still produce CO2, Mr Google suggests at about half the rate of fossil fuels. Hydrogen produces water.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I don't like EV cars at all. I look forward to there being no parking when 60s multi storeys are closed because they will not bear the weight, potholes have multiplied for the same reason and Londoners have respiratory problems from inhaling the additional brake dust and rubber particles. Just Stop Lithium will be out in force. The folly will then have been proved.

Biofuels still produce CO2, Mr Google suggests at about half the rate of fossil fuels. Hydrogen produces water.
The issue is how you make the hydrogen in the first place. At the moment, we actually make it from methane (natural gas), so you aren’t solving the problem there either. If you used solar to split water though, you’d have truly renewable energy and fuel sources.
 

Boicey

Well-Known Member
We’re not really helping to achieve net zero if all we’re doing is exporting out carbon emissions. Usually importing fossil fuels that are a) more carbon intensive and b) there’s a cost to transporting coal from Argentina, for example.

It’s like a lot of EVs, the initial outlay of carbon is usually higher than petrol/diesel cars and the cars need to last 5-10 years to actually break even on CO2 emissions. How many people (especially those that can afford EVs) keep the same car for 5+ years?
That's misinformation.
'It takes less than two years for a typical EV to pay off the “carbon debt” from its battery. Over the full vehicle lifecycle, carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from an EV are around three times lower than an average petrol car.
In reality, therefore, an EV in Europe will pay off its carbon debt after around 11,000 miles (18,000km), according to the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT)'.
Btw EV batteries are designed to last over 300,000. Many in operation already with more than that with still around 80% battery state of charge, 200 miles usable range.
 
Last edited:

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
We’re not really helping to achieve net zero if all we’re doing is exporting out carbon emissions. Usually importing fossil fuels that are a) more carbon intensive and b) there’s a cost to transporting coal from Argentina, for example.

It’s like a lot of EVs, the initial outlay of carbon is usually higher than petrol/diesel cars and the cars need to last 5-10 years to actually break even on CO2 emissions. How many people (especially those that can afford EVs) keep the same car for 5+ years?

Youd get on with Malc.
 

Boicey

Well-Known Member
I don't like EV cars at all. I look forward to there being no parking when 60s multi storeys are closed because they will not bear the weight, potholes have multiplied for the same reason and Londoners have respiratory problems from inhaling the additional brake dust and rubber particles. Just Stop Lithium will be out in force. The folly will then have been proved.

Biofuels still produce CO2, Mr Google suggests at about half the rate of fossil fuels. Hydrogen produces water.
A lot of nonsense here.
All EV's now have regen braking, and increasingly commonly one pedal driving, which uses much less friction braking. If anything the issue is lack of brake use which can cause disc rusting.
Inhaling tyre rubber that well known danger compared to exhaust emissions. Lolz
Btw most tyre rubber is used by fast acceleration and that doesn't typically happen in high traffic density.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
A lot of nonsense here.
All EV's now have regen braking, and increasingly commonly one pedal driving, which uses much less friction braking. If anything the issue is lack of brake use which can cause disc rusting.
Inhaling tyre rubber that well known danger compared to exhaust emissions. Lolz
Btw most tyre rubber is used by fast acceleration and that doesn't typically happen in high traffic density.
Diesel was promoted as safer by the last Labour government. Guess what, it proved not to be because of other pollutants. As soon as one hazard is removed, another will take its place.

You don’t disagree about the car parks or potholes presumably. A hidden cost. Hydrogen would make more sense made from all that water we have surrounding the UK.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
A lot of nonsense here.
All EV's now have regen braking, and increasingly commonly one pedal driving, which uses much less friction braking. If anything the issue is lack of brake use which can cause disc rusting.
Inhaling tyre rubber that well known danger compared to exhaust emissions. Lolz
Btw most tyre rubber is used by fast acceleration and that doesn't typically happen in high traffic density.

They do have regan braking. However all require friction braking at some point when stopping from speed.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
Diesel was promoted as safer by the last Labour government. Guess what, it proved not to be because of other pollutants. As soon as one hazard is removed, another will take its place.

You don’t disagree about the car parks or potholes presumably. A hidden cost. Hydrogen would make more sense made from all that water we have surrounding the UK.

Yeah carrying around tons of highly explosive material to charge a battery makes way more sense than just charging it on the grid.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
How is this not already a thing after the last govt? Anyone got a telegraph sub and can tell?



You do wonder WTF a lot of them, especially Home Secretaries have been doing. Like Bravermann banging on about migration when she oversaw in net 700k+ 🤷‍♂️

Saying that the home office has always been a shitshow (I remember John Reid calling them out 25 years or so ago)
 

Boicey

Well-Known Member
Diesel was promoted as safer by the last Labour government. Guess what, it proved not to be because of other pollutants. As soon as one hazard is removed, another will take its place.

You don’t disagree about the car parks or potholes presumably. A hidden cost. Hydrogen would make more sense made from all that water we have surrounding the UK.
The inevitable 'another hazard will take its place'. Laughable halfwittery.
The car park and pothole is pure Daily Mail nonsense. It could apply to any large vehicles (and there are plenty of SUV's) turning up en masse in the same place and time. That doesn't happen.
Anyway EV's are getting smaller and batteries lighter. The Citroen e C3 is lighter than a Golf.
Personally I'd take a pothole repair than polluting my kids and leaving them with a climate problem.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top