Do you want to discuss boring politics? (13 Viewers)

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
Been saying for years there should be a bursary and/or refund system for tuition fees for certain subjects and jobs as part of a wider industrial strategy.

For certain public sector jobs ie teachers or nurses it could be part of an agreement to gradually write off tuition fees after years served. More years you serve in public sector, more written off

I think there is already some support for nurses but more just grants/bursary, no tie in which doesn’t make sense to me
On the flip side, my ex worked for the NHS. They paid her fees to go to Uni for 3 years, she continued to get her salary and they had to pay for someone to cover her for 3 years.

There was absolutely nothing in place to say she had to work a single day for NHS after completing the degree.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
It is austerity. They backed themselves into a corner on tax, all that’s left is austerity. Should have just reversed the NI cuts really.
At least they will find it difficult to do anything about the two child benefit cap. Won’t be able to blame the unfounded cost pressures on the Tories.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
On the flip side, my ex worked for the NHS. They paid her fees to go to Uni for 3 years, she continued to get her salary and they had to pay for someone to cover her for 3 years.

There was absolutely nothing in place to say she had to work a single day for NHS after completing the degree.

🤦‍♂️
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
I wonder why pensions are so many multiples of cost of living in Luxembourg? EU?

Because the Luxembourg government chooses to pay pensions that highly is the only reason, it's state pension so nothing to do with the EU.

The UK government chooses not to pay pensions and instead chooses to spend a lot more money treating ailments associated with poor health and poor standards of living for some old people.

It chooses to give some old people the illusion of wealth through property inflation rather than actual money.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Because the Luxembourg government chooses to pay pensions that highly is the only reason, it's state pension so nothing to do with the EU.

The UK government chooses not to pay pensions and instead chooses to spend a lot more money treating ailments associated with poor health and poor standards of living for some old people.

It chooses to give some old people the illusion of wealth through property inflation rather than actual money.

Also, think average salaries in Luxembourg are quite high. Whether that's down to lots of EU associated work I don't know.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Because the Luxembourg government chooses to pay pensions that highly is the only reason, it's state pension so nothing to do with the EU.

The UK government chooses not to pay pensions and instead chooses to spend a lot more money treating ailments associated with poor health and poor standards of living for some old people.

It chooses to give some old people the illusion of wealth through property inflation rather than actual money.

I think it’s a bit more complex than that. I’m not sure about luxumborg specifically but with other nations employees and/or employers are required to pay more into the state pension pot over the employees working life. This would impact their take home pay during their career

We now have compulsory private pensions with companies having to pay in set amounts and contributions matched (this amount should be rolled into the state pension comparison really as it’s compulsory). I believe our standard company pensions are higher than some and also don’t know what countries tax reliefs are on employee contributions. we also know public sector workers have excellent private pensions


an example…

‘Pre-tax rates for the full pension in Spain are more than 81% of the gross annual salary, the highest rate in Europe. Pensions are funded by contributions from both employees (4.7% of salary) and employers (23.6% of a worker’s salary). Self-employed people must pay all of their contributions’

I’m not saying ours are great but comparisons are not always like for like and everything needs to be taken in the round. As you say many pensioners have built up value in their property rather than maybe paying into a pension, the equity of which can be released later in life
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
I think it’s a bit more complex than that. I’m not sure about luxumborg specifically but with other nations employees and/or employers are required to pay more into the state pension pot over the employees working life. This would impact their take home pay during their career

We now have compulsory private pensions with companies having to pay in set amounts and contributions matched (this amount should be rolled into the state pension comparison really as it’s compulsory). I believe our standard company pensions are higher than some and also don’t know what countries tax reliefs are on employee contributions. we also know public sector workers have excellent private pensions


an example…

‘Pre-tax rates for the full pension in Spain are more than 81% of the gross annual salary, the highest rate in Europe. Pensions are funded by contributions from both employees (4.7% of salary) and employers (23.6% of a worker’s salary). Self-employed people must pay all of their contributions’

I’m not saying ours are great but comparisons are not always like for like and everything needs to be taken in the round. As you say many pensioners have built up value in their property rather than maybe paying into a pension, the equity of which can be released later in life
Interesting comparison with Spain. NHS pension contributions by employees is 5.2% to 12.5% and employers is 23.7%. Certainly don’t receive anything approaching 81% of gross annual salary.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
Interesting comparison with Spain. NHS pension contributions by employees is 5.2% to 12.5% and employers is 23.7%. Certainly don’t receive anything approaching 81% of gross annual salary.

I suppose you roll state pension and nhs pension together though to make a fairer comparison. I was just saying the structure of pensions, contributions etc appears different in every nation
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
I suppose you roll state pension and nhs pension together though to make a fairer comparison. I was just saying the structure of pensions, contributions etc appears different in every nation
If so, you would have to add NI contributions, employee and employer, to the numbers I quoted.
 

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
I think they mean "cut for the first time since Liz Truss's barking mad budget". It was rolling along nicely at less than 0.5% for years before that

That’s a bit unfair. She was one crazy lady but rates had already started to increase and were already at 2-2.25% when she became PM. They were subsequently raised due to continued inflation which was a global issue. Truss did probably cost the country billions due to a spike in government bond yields/borrowing costs caused by mini budget and subsequent ‘moron premium’ but Sunak and hunt settled this down. BoE rates really increased due to persistent inflation though.

Ps good news for people looking at new mortgages the 10 year which some
Lenders use as a bit of a steer on their mortgage rates is now down to 3.9%
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
I think they mean "cut for the first time since Liz Truss's barking mad budget". It was rolling along nicely at less than 0.5% for years before that
It was only a matter of minutes from this being announced to the first article I saw that was 'of course this won't mean mortgage rates will come down'. Always the same with anything, quick to go up, slow to come back down.
 

wingy

Well-Known Member
It was only a matter of minutes from this being announced to the first article I saw that was 'of course this won't mean mortgage rates will come down'. Always the same with anything, quick to go up, slow to come back down.
It will they already did in advance of to this, on New borrowing anyway!
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
This doesn't seem a great way to promote tech investment and push for growth

Yes and no, need to look at the details but Sunak got dazzled by a load of nonsense from tech founders on this so wouldn’t be surprised if there’s fat to cut. I think things like getting data centres built is more important, the area isn’t lacking in research funds and only about five big tech companies world wide have the scale to train leading edge models.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
I was reading that the right to strike isn’t enshrined in UK law.
The 2023 legislation is especially egregious, but there have been several rounds of anti union laws passed since 2010. As a minimum, all of these need to be repealed.

While the laws on striking are important though, it’s the ones on collective bargaining that should be looked at a lot more heavily.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
It got lost in everything else, but I meant to say that I’m no fan of Reeves as you know, but she had the good sense to recognise that not giving teachers the pay deal would be a lot more costly than doing so.

Im not a fan, but this base level of competence it what you get from any Labour chancellor as they aren’t beholden to mental ideology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PVA

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Im not a fan, but this base level of competence it what you get from any Labour chancellor as they aren’t beholden to mental ideology.
It also stands to reason that actually talking to unions and coming to the table with them leads to strike action getting sorted much sooner.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
It also stands to reason that actually talking to unions and coming to the table with them leads to strike action getting sorted much sooner.
Coincidentally, the union I'm in is going to ballot us for strike action in the next few weeks.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
Very true. Capitulation sorts strike action out really quickly.

Train drivers next.

It's hardly 'capitulation' to settle a long term dispute with a compromise, especially where the costs to everybody of the dispute continuing accumulate.

It's funny really, Tories agree with the idea of the market setting the price of goods and services until it's the labour market.
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
Very true. Capitulation sorts strike action out really quickly.

Train drivers next.
What you call capitulation, I would call negotiation.
 

MalcSB

Well-Known Member
It's hardly 'capitulation' to settle a long term dispute with a compromise, especially where the costs to everybody of the dispute continuing accumulate.

It's funny really, Tories agree with the idea of the market setting the price of goods and services until it's the labour market.
What was the compromise with the junior doctors, for example? More productivity?

What will be the compromise with rail unions? Modernisation of working practices?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top