shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Im saying he won’t have been told anything about budgets for Jan.
Doug King Takeover (4 Viewers)
- Thread starter jackdg
- Start date
Im saying he won’t have been told anything about budgets for Jan.
RegTheDonk
Well-Known Member
He sounded a bit amateur but at least he's said it's a debt free fresh start. Lost count of how many appeals he made to the bondholders. Going to be another interesting day.
fatso
Well-Known Member
Did you sign your name as Duffer by any chance?
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Only if they pay for anything pitch related and have a deal that they can’t play if the pitch quality deteriorates.
Sick Boy
Super Moderator
No, they can get fucked.
torchomatic
Well-Known Member
Absolutely. However, there's a big difference in a player wanting to leave rather than us hawking him around as we have no cash.
I'm happy with the INTENT not to sell. If a player want to go, then there's nothing we, or the club, can do.
CovInEssex
Well-Known Member
Did anyone else fist bump when he said we won't be sellers come Jan
AFCCOVENTRY
Well-Known Member
King saying we won’t be selling players in the Jan window. We’re no longer a selling club…!
ceetee
Well-Known Member
It's not a coincidence and he said as much.
That association gave him an intro to approach Joy
fatso
Well-Known Member
Dawkins was squeeling like a pig because he got no response from the administrator and wasn't allowed to forward a bid or even have a conversation. But clearly he doesn't understand what a period of exclusivity means.
I'd worry about him being involved if that's the case.
AFCCOVENTRY
Well-Known Member
Fair play to Dawkins but he’s a rabbit caught in the headlights. A step too far. Good luck to him though.
slowpoke
Well-Known Member
Three angles in this 1, King is genuine and our long time wish for Abramovic type owner, a bit like sisu said they would be, 2 A con, sisu in disguise, 3, Makes no difference to todays court hearing it’s not about ccfc who are merely tenants and the preferred bidder comes away with the CBS then what. Or maybe a fourth to up any bid for the purchase of ccfc in the future.
duffer
Well-Known Member
In terms of timing, I wrote before Ashley's 'preferred bidder' status had been confirmed.
Don't get me wrong, I'm fairly certain it would never have come off, but the complete lack of response is vaguely interesting.
I'm glad they never came back in many ways, personally I'd never want to be out in the middle of all of this, but it wouldn't have been too hard to get the ball rolling on a crowdfunding site if there had been any serious interest and then take it from there.
It's the sort of thing I'd expect the Trust to have stepped up to in all seriousness, they could claim a lot more credibility than a random bloke like me and maybe gather some proper external support. Too late now either way, we'll soon see what happens I guess.
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Lord grant me the confidence of a Sunderland fan
Samo
Well-Known Member
What was he asking the bondholders for? To bloke the MA bid?
fatso
Well-Known Member
It's also worth pointing out that Ashley secured a period of exclusivity by paying 1.2 million of his own money to keep the Arena operating during the admin process, this enabled CCFC to fulfil the home fixtures amongst other things.
I didn't see Sisu, Dawkins or king offering such monies (unsecured) upfront!
Thats good banter tbf
Nick
Administrator
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
Curveball - Mike Ashley is The Coventry City to our Real Betis
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
I mean this with due respect
but a bit like football clubs get countless enquiries from spotty teenagers with Championship Manager experience, I' sure the administrator has a bunch of jokers who enquire over a football club.I reckon you've been marked in that category
shmmeee
Well-Known Member
King is offering to keep the arena operating.
Nick
Administrator
Ashley didn't offer it unsecured.
Samo
Well-Known Member
fatso
Well-Known Member
We only send our shit and our crocks up there.
skybluepm2
Well-Known Member
Halfway through the interview and a few things strike me as being frankly bizarre;
He’s willing to invest £25m (or perhaps 85% of), to obtain the leasehold of a Stadium that he appears never to have visited (‘I hear it’s not in great shape’).
‘No due diligence has been done, but the bid is £25m’. So just a random figure plucked out of the sky, there must be some maths behind it?!
His overuse of the word ‘super’ and insistence on replacing the letter ‘t’ with ‘d’.
He’s willing to invest £25m (or perhaps 85% of), to obtain the leasehold of a Stadium that he appears never to have visited (‘I hear it’s not in great shape’).
‘No due diligence has been done, but the bid is £25m’. So just a random figure plucked out of the sky, there must be some maths behind it?!
His overuse of the word ‘super’ and insistence on replacing the letter ‘t’ with ‘d’.
Evo1883
Well-Known Member
Not true is it, they are under contract .. the fees bid though will be a different matter , and I'd imagine that's where we can't say no
fatso
Well-Known Member
He got no guarantee of a purchase.
fernandopartridge
Well-Known Member
Trying not to be too cynical but to say in the same interview that you're willing to pay £25m cash but also that you've not looked at the books seems a bit off
Nick
Administrator
He literally explained it isn't?
Will just have to wait and see, fuck around and find out.
Otis
Well-Known Member
No, but he could have said we don't have to sell players in January couldn't he?
No sales is a daft thing to say
HuckerbyDublinWhelan
Well-Known Member
M I’m
It’s the ready made reason why we’ll have to sell Gyokeres for 3m in January
KenilworthSkyBlue
Well-Known Member
I assume he means no forced sales. Which we would've almost certainly have to have done in January in order to remain solvent.
The club will still have its price. Every club does.
duffer
Well-Known Member
I mean this with due respect
I reckon you've been marked in that category
Quite possibly mate, but I'm capable of appearing reasonably professional when it comes to it.
It wasn't done anonymously and I was completely open and serious about the intention. Good practice, imho, would have been to respond regardless. A request for proof of funds would soon push away any chancers.
D
Deleted member 5849
Guest
VBut so am I, and I struggle to get people to take me seriously on house purchases, let alone stadium buys!