Nick
Administrator
You need a Sky Blue Kid selection of suits.
VBut so am I, and I struggle to get people to take me seriously on house purchases, let alone stadium buys!
It's a nice round number too, almost like picked to sound impressive, rather than anything behind it.Trying not to be too cynical but to say in the same interview that you're willing to pay £25m cash but also that you've not looked at the books seems a bit off
Exactly. Badly worded perhaps.I assume he means no forced sales. Which we would've almost certainly have to have done in January in order to remain solvent.
The club will still have its price. Every club does.
How embarassing they just want to be usView attachment 27313
BREAKING: Gyokeres no longer moving to Sunderland
VBut so am I, and I struggle to get people to take me seriously on house purchases, let alone stadium buys!
Absolutely. However, there's a big difference in a player wanting to leave rather than us hawking him around as we have no cash.
I'm happy with the INTENT not to sell. If a player want to go, then there's nothing we, or the club, can do.
Plus he could get injured.Take over or not if Vik stays post January he’s an idiot. Football is a fickle game, if he stayed and then his form dipped he would soon be forgotten. Go grab a big 4 year contract lad, the equivalent of a lottery win while you are the current big thing
This is just a ploy to get Ashley to bid for the club isn't it?
Plus he could get injured.
As it stands we could well get silly money for him, so now the time is ripe .
Not at all it’s probably the reason why joy trusts him and was willing to work with himhjs association with the co founder of Sisu just a co-incidence?
Hyam I supposeWhere has the club said that?
It was for cashflow for HMRC with a payment plan wasn't it?
It appears the administrators are doing there job, by honouring Ashley's period of exclusivity, and Sisu/King and Dawkins are using the local media to table bids to try and turn the bond holders heads.
The £25 million headline statement will soon evaporate if Ashley's tabled bid is rejected. I'd guess it'll turn to '£25 mill subject to due diligence' quickly.
He has said he has showed people proof of funds.
Remember when Dale Evans must have showed a betting slip?
It appears the administrators are doing there job, by honouring Ashley's period of exclusivity, and Sisu/King and Dawkins are using the local media to table bids to try and turn the bond holders heads.
The £25 million headline statement will soon evaporate if Ashley's tabled bid is rejected. I'd guess it'll turn to '£25 mill subject to due diligence' quickly.
Walter Mitty was more credible than Dale Evans .To be fair King seems more credible than poker face Evans
Do the bond holders have legal representation in court today?
To be fair King seems more credible than poker face Evans
SISU wouldn’t have got King involved if he was anything like Evans
They weren’t duped by Evans, they saw right through what he was and laughed him off the negotiating table
Do the bond holders have legal representation in court today?
They are not opposing the Ashley bid
The admin or the takeoverIn that case I can’t really see this going any other way
The admin or the takeover
Agreedadmin
So would duffer and I in a dream team consortirum.To be fair King seems more credible than poker face Evans
Isn't MA the preferred bidder because he put up a non-refundable 1.2 million to keep ACL going in the interim? No other bidder was prepared to do that were they? Or have I missed something (again)!Is that because it’s not in administration yet? They have very specific guidelines to dispose of assets and probably pre administration, have to act on behalf of the bond holders, if no going concern solution found, administration and then it’s open to bidders and then that could be a viable option subject to fans and funding solution.
Ashley has tried to secure a preferred position pre admin so I am not sure anyone else, including the club, can actually bid until that exclusivity period has passed or goes into formal administration
It appears the administrators are doing there job, by honouring Ashley's period of exclusivity, and Sisu/King and Dawkins are using the local media to table bids to try and turn the bond holders heads.
The £25 million headline statement will soon evaporate if Ashley's tabled bid is rejected. I'd guess it'll turn to '£25 mill subject to due diligence' quickly.
Hmmm...£25m is such an arbitrary figure...one which is bound to make waves amongst the boldholders, making SISU look like the knight in shining armour.
Is this just a classic SISU case of offering more money than MA, then when MA gets the stadium, take him/administrator to court saying they offered more ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?