Ellis Simms (1 Viewer)

SBAndy

Well-Known Member
The point is to sign players who will already be at the standard you want when the player ahead of him is sold. So as opposed to going ‘oh shit we need a right back’, we have one ready made.

It’d be quite nice, although in practice I have doubts over whether it’d work, to sign players in the summer and sell in January. You’d then hope that the new signings had sufficient time to get up to speed to act more as a ready-made replacement.
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
The model is super easy to understand …:

You buy and develop talented players to sell on
You add to that a couple of experienced pro’s to help with that growth and to give the team match day smarts.
You add 1 or 2 loans where the budget won’t stretch to perm signings of a similar calibre.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
The model is super easy to understand …:

You buy and develop talented players to sell on
You add to that a couple of experienced pro’s to help with that growth and to give the team match day smarts.
You add 1 or 2 loans where the budget won’t stretch to perm signings of a similar calibre.
Isn’t that the same for most clubs?
 

Deity

Well-Known Member
Isn’t that the same for most clubs?
Yes. Not all clubs.

Hull for example have gone for the loan route and hope for a promo that way.

Leicester have gambled on established players on big wages and hoped promo would bail them out.

Wolves, and Brentford targeted one particular nationality of player to try to atttact a slighter better player from that country … Wolves ( Portugal ) and Brentford ( Denmark )



However I agree many clubs are trying to follow the Brighton model. The key is to have the funds to actually buy top talent and then the scouting network to identify it !
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
Yes. Not all clubs.

Hull for example have gone for the loan route and hope for a promo that way.

Leicester have gambled on established players on big wages and hoped promo would bail them out.

Wolves, and Brentford targeted one particular nationality of player to try to atttact a slighter better player from that country … Wolves ( Portugal ) and Brentford ( Denmark )



However I agree many clubs are trying to follow the Brighton model. The key is to have the funds to actually buy top talent and then the scouting network to identify it !
Most clubs can't follow the Brighton model because they don't have owners funding the club with 100s of millions; we certainly aren't.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
Yes. Not all clubs.

Hull for example have gone for the loan route and hope for a promo that way.

Leicester have gambled on established players on big wages and hoped promo would bail them out.

Wolves, and Brentford targeted one particular nationality of player to try to atttact a slighter better player from that country … Wolves ( Portugal ) and Brentford ( Denmark )



However I agree many clubs are trying to follow the Brighton model. The key is to have the funds to actually buy top talent and then the scouting network to identify it !
Bristol C have gone in on the academy, bearing a lot of fruit from that. Problem for us is we’re surrounded by clubs who can hoover up the talent whereas they’re pretty much on their own.
 

skybluecam

Well-Known Member
I disagree. You end up always with inconsistency playing prospects rather than players at the top of their game.

I think Thomas and Kitching will be really good players but they will leave once they are for example. We'll have them while they are making mistakes regularly.

Buying and keeping players in their "prime" (26-30 ish) is the most expensive way to run a club. Transfer fees for them will be high, their wage demands will be high and when it's time for them to move on you will get less for them and may also struggle to shift them because of said wage demands.

You're going to have to get used to us buying and playing young, developing players.
 

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
How long before he gets pissed off with being subbed all the time? One of the league's best forwards being subbed to accommodate inferior players.

How the fuck are Simms, Asante and Bassett gonna get minutes to find rhythm? It's bizarre.
Because the subs are pre planned regardless of what’s going on on the pitch.
 

Alkhen

Well-Known Member
How long before he gets pissed off with being subbed all the time? One of the league's best forwards being subbed to accommodate inferior players.

How the fuck are Simms, Asante and Bassett gonna get minutes to find rhythm? It's bizarre.
All players get subbed off at points, he'll get over it
 

TomRad85

Well-Known Member
I'm a big Simms fans but he was poor today not sure how that can be denied. Not been a great start to the season for him.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
 

Marty

Well-Known Member
Have to agree, players don't have the chance to get into a rhythm. The squad is dare I say, barron in some areas and bloated in others. Couldn't with the fact Torp is an absolute passenger 95% of the time.
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
This is so lazy. The creativity of the midfield is equally reliant on the runs of the forward.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
True, but if your midfield keep passing to the opposition instead of our forwards, what chance have they got?

It was obvious early on that Simms wasn't going to get much service, so taking him off at least keeps him fresh for Tuesday.
 

ms639

Well-Known Member
True, but if your midfield keep passing to the opposition instead of our forwards, what chance have they got?

It was obvious early on that Simms wasn't going to get much service, so taking him off at least keeps him fresh for Tuesday.

Again this is so lazy. I know a first team player. They were baffled when Simms signed as to how bad his basic skills were. Dreadful first touch etc.

With Wright and Tats playing off him, the ball has to stick when it goes into him and it doesn’t, as a fan it’s so easy to say ‘he’s not getting the service’ but when you watch football you have to question how much the other players trust him to fix it into feet and think it’s the right thing to do.

I know 100% that the confidence from other players isn’t there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ms639

Well-Known Member
Its the fact he's so willfully replaced that's the issue. We're turning a 20 million quid player into a 3 million quid one through lack of midfield and constantly subbing him because of expensive forwards on the bench.

This is bollocks. If he was a 20 million quid player he wouldn’t be pulled.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

fatso

Well-Known Member
Again this is so lazy. I know a first team player. They were baffled when Simms signed as to how bad his basic skills were. Dreadful first touch etc.

With Wright and Tats playing off him, the ball has to stick when it goes into him and it doesn’t, as a fan it’s so easy to say ‘he’s not getting the service’ but when you watch football you have to question how much the other players trust him to fix it into feet and think it’s the right thing to do.

I know 100% that the confidence from other players isn’t there.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Remind me again how many he scored last season.
 

ms639

Well-Known Member
Remind me again how many he scored last season.

Oh absolutely. Do not get me wrong. I’m not in the camp of Simms is not a good goal scorer. But and it’s a big but, the system we play is ball into him, other players run off and create.

The issue is, so far, the ball into him doesn’t stick and it undermines everything we’re about.

We have arguably 2 of the best wingers in the division in Wright and Tats and at the moment Simms inability to bring them into the game is hurting us


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top