England cricket 2019 (2 Viewers)

[lifeskyblue]

Last three batsmen all out for a duck.

The two run outs don’t really count tho as they just had to go for it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

---

[PurpleBin]

Best game of all time?

 

[Gazolba]

NZ should really win since they lost the least wickets.

 

[lifeskyblue]

Best game of all time?

Can’t argue with you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[bringbackrattles]

This is great. Bag of nerves though !

 

[Terry_dactyl]

Incredible.

 

[Gazolba]

Best game of all time?

If Richie Benaud was commentating, he'd recall one better.

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

Sensational stuff. Officially a cricket fan now!

 

[The Great Eastern]

A quite amazing last couple of overs.

 

[PurpleBin]

I'm a part time fan myself but after this you can see people getting into it.

 

[Gazolba]

Big responsibility for Archer.

 

[Grendel]

Last three batsmen all out for a duck.

Yeah to try and get stokes on strike you clown

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

Yeah to try and get stokes on strike you clown

The commentary said as much.

 

[Johnnythespider]

I really don't understand how these rules work. Same score super over, same score again England win ????

 

[tisza]

Just insane

 

[Terry_dactyl]

Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant.

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

Great stuff

 

[wingy]

I really don't understand how these rules work. Same score super over, same score again England win ????

The rules are a bit barmy!!

 

[Paul Anthony]

It just couldn't be simple could it!?

 

[Tommo1993]

Never watched a cricket game in my life. I’ve watched the last hour and it was one of the most tense and exciting games of sport I’ve ever seen. I don’t get all the rules, but understand just about enough I think.

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

I really don't understand how these rules work. Same score super over, same score again England win ????

Not sure either, maybe alphabetic or runs scored during tournament?

 

[oscillatewildly]

Best moment on CH4 since that lesbian kiss.

 

[Gazolba]

Well that was as close as you could possibly get.
It was unfair in a way because England had the advantage of a batsman who was already in.
The most logical thing would be to decide a tie on wickets lost.
But this was a much more dramatic conclusion.

 

[Grendel]

Not sure either, maybe alphabetic or runs scored during tournament?

It’s simply the second batting team must exceed the first teams score

 

[SBAndy]

Not sure either, maybe alphabetic or runs scored during tournament?

Looked it up, it’s done on boundaries scored in the 51 overs. England won on boundaries!

 

[xcraigx]

Not sure either, maybe alphabetic or runs scored during tournament?

If scores are tied after a super over the team that hit the most boundaries during the initial 50 over match wins.

 

[SBAndy]

It’s simply the second batting team must exceed the first teams score

Will we see the first ever admission that you were wrong?

 

[bringbackrattles]

Never in doubt !

 

[oldskyblue58]

If super over scores tied they count back the number of boundaries in each innings of actual match .....England had more

What a game!!! Tough on New Zealand but great win for England !!

 

[stay_up_skyblues]

If scores are tied after a super over the team that hit the most boundaries during the initial 50 over match wins.

Makes sense!

 

[Grendel]

Will we see the first ever admission that you were wrong?

That’s what the commentator said I’ve never seen a super over in my life

 

[Liquid Gold]

Speechless

 

[Grendel]

If super over scores tied they count back the number of boundaries in each innings of actual match .....England had more

What a game!!! Tough on New Zealand but great win for England !!

It’s a bit random as batting second chasing at the end boundaries are more likely

 

[tisza]

Well that was as close as you could possibly get.
It was unfair in a way because England had the advantage of a batsman who was already in.
The most logical thing would be to decide a tie on wickets lost.
But this was a much more dramatic conclusion.

Argument is just as difficult for the 2nd over bowler going in cold

 

[Grendel]

Argument is just as difficult for the 2nd over bowler going in cold

Exactly - archer had nerves of steel for those last two balls