So what you're saying is, because we were beaten in the semis, the players are wankers?We got to a world cup semi final the other year for the first time in 28 years (second time ever) and the players completely flapped it
Although I agree with your sentiment (and reaction) I am just wondering who you class as the overpaid proms-donna’s in the England side nowadays?
I washed my hands of the England National team after the Iceland debacle at the Euros. How anybody puts prima donnas of the highest order before their club football is beyond me.
I washed my hands of the England National team after the Iceland debacle at the Euros. How anybody puts prima donnas of the highest order before their club football is beyond me.
Not really-just can’t muster the enthusiasm or take an interest anymore in headphone wearing prima donnas that don’t perform and are then too kean on sticking ttwo fingers up too the fans by showing off their cars and swimming pools the next day all over the internet.You no longer support England because they lost to Iceland?
Is that any different from club football?Not really-just can’t muster the enthusiasm or take an interest anymore in headphone wearing prima donnas that don’t perform and are then too kean on sticking ttwo fingers up too the fans by showing off their cars and swimming pools the next day all over the internet.
Could be argued that’s the way it is/has gone especially at the top level/in the Prem etc.Is that any different from club football?
I am different there you see. If City were playing Spurs, I wouldn't give Harry Kane any stick at all. Same with Beckham and Lampard and Ferdinand and Gazza etc. If they play for England I leave them alone, unless they are being a complete arse in the game against us.Could be argued that’s the way it is/has gone especially at the top level/in the Prem etc.
Bit ironic also when supporting your club team and playing against an England international in the other team that he will be abused/called all the names under the sun, but then on Wednesday night when he is playing for England we then support him?
Just not for me anymore I’m afraid.
So what you're saying is, because we were beaten in the semis, the players are wankers?
When we beat Colombia on penalties did it look like it meant nothing to the players?
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Not really-just can’t muster the enthusiasm or take an interest anymore in headphone wearing prima donnas that don’t perform and are then too kean on sticking ttwo fingers up too the fans by showing off their cars and swimming pools the next day all over the internet.
Although I agree with your sentiment (and reaction) I am just wondering who you class as the overpaid proms-donna’s in the England side nowadays?
What’s wrong with that? They’re allowed to have a life outside of football and show off what they’ve worked hard for like anyone else, they don’t exist to appease fans.
So what? Nobody has a go at actors for flaunting their wealth. They’re 20 something people, Christ if I had a fleet of super cars I’d have them all over social media.They earn millions a year for perhaps 20 hours of football a week and also retain full pay when injured
So what? Nobody has a go at actors for flaunting their wealth. They’re 20 something people, Christ if I had a fleet of super cars I’d have them all over social media.
They earn millions because it’s a position only few elite people can fill.
I think they're knobheads for doing that too. It isn't hard work, it's being very good at what is a hobby for hundreds of millions. Doesn't mean they deserve to be filthy fucking rich over those who do much harder tasks for a tiny fraction of the pay. Does Maguire really deserve £5 million+ a year before tax? We both know the answer.
Market conditions and all that. Football is a wealthy industry, only makes sense that those at the top of the game are rewarded in kind.
No, I don’t think Maguire deserves that kind of pay.
Anybody that actually gives a shit about football should be nowhere near a sky sports subscription.I know the economic reasons as to why they get that pay, it doesn't make it right when we all know there are far harder jobs that get paid much much less. If you're getting more in a week than the Prime Minister gets in a year, perhaps we should have a rethink.
I know the economic reasons as to why they get that pay, it doesn't make it right when we all know there are far harder jobs that get paid much much less. If you're getting more in a week than the Prime Minister gets in a year, perhaps we should have a rethink.
So in a great turn of events if you suddenly became a top level pro footballer, you’d say keep your silly money and just pay me national living wage? Fair play to them, not their fault they get paid what they do!
Well it is a difficult job. There’s 6 billion people in the world and there’s only 500 spots in the premier league. Only the elite play there.I know the economic reasons as to why they get that pay, it doesn't make it right when we all know there are far harder jobs that get paid much much less. If you're getting more in a week than the Prime Minister gets in a year, perhaps we should have a rethink.
Well it is a difficult job. There’s 6 billion people in the world and there’s only 500 spots in the premier league. Only the elite play there.
The prime minister is paid by the public purse, footballers are paid by private individuals. Footballers and their ability are the reason the Premier League earns 6/7 billion in tv rights.
Entertainment is a billion pound industry - I’d say the workers deserve a fair cut of that income.The Prime Minister runs the country, there's only 1 spot in No. 10. Footballers kick a ball around for people's entertainment for a couple of hours a week. There isn't really a moral justification for why the former should earn less in a year than the latter does in a week.
Entertainment is a billion pound industry - I’d say the workers deserve a fair cut of that income.
The gravity of the task is neither here or there, Nobody pays £100 per month to watch Boris hash up the country.
You say the prime minister is one spot - the fact is he’s just a figure head, there’s hundreds behind him that make the decisions, not just him
Entertainment is a billion pound industry - I’d say the workers deserve a fair cut of that income.
The gravity of the task is neither here or there, Nobody pays £100 per month to watch Boris hash up the country.
You say the prime minister is one spot - the fact is he’s just a figure head, there’s hundreds behind him that make the decisions, not just him
Grow up .
They aren't worth the vast wealth they're accumuling via the cartel which sequestrates your monthly fees to their clubs , Jesus even then it leaves the club's on the verge of bankruptcy.
Barr that it's fucking immoral to have so much .
I think they're knobheads for doing that too. It isn't hard work, it's being very good at what is a hobby for hundreds of millions. Doesn't mean they deserve to be filthy fucking rich over those who do much harder tasks for a tiny fraction of the pay. Does Maguire really deserve £5 million+ a year before tax? We both know the answer.
Grow up .
They aren't worth the vast wealth they're accumuling via the cartel which sequestrates your monthly fees to their clubs , Jesus even then it leaves the club's on the verge of bankruptcy.
Barr that it's fucking immoral to have so much .
ShArE iF yOu ThInK SoLdIErS ShOuLd bE pAyEd FoOtBaLlErS WaGeS!The Prime Minister runs the country, there's only 1 spot in No. 10. Footballers kick a ball around for people's entertainment for a couple of hours a week. There isn't really a moral justification for why the former should earn less in a year than the latter does in a week.
ShArE iF yOu ThInK SoLdIErS ShOuLd bE pAyEd FoOtBaLlErS WaGeS!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?