He'll be stoked at SISU keeping 15%, then
Definitely Kevin the Teenager
Definitely Kevin the Teenager
You can almost see how aroused wearing that chain of office makes him
I mean again, Maton being a prick, but he didn’t block it, the Tories just refused to explain the wording and staged a walkout instead.
I mean again, Maton being a prick, but he didn’t block it, the Tories just refused to explain the wording and staged a walkout instead.
I don't disagree. Unfortunately anything with Maton in it will look bad though, won't it!I mean again, Maton being a prick, but he didn’t block it, the Tories just refused to explain the wording and staged a walkout instead.
When a Labour mayor's actions force me to side with pudding headed tory Gary Ridley I really can't feel anything but contempt for him.
Yeah, discuss the wording of the motion before coming back and discussing said motion.It didn't have the bit where it said the people need to go off in a side room to discuss it.
Yeah, discuss the wording of the motion before coming back and discussing said motion.
It didn't have the bit where it said the people need to go off in a side room to discuss it.
When a Labour mayor's actions force me to side with pudding headed tory Gary Ridley I really can't feel anything but contempt for him.
It's a strange ask though... there isn't anything wrong with this wording but I'm going to ask you to change it anyway...That was after they wouldn’t explain i think and again not a massive ask. But it’s hard to hear what they’re saying on the webcast when they’re shouting out. Feels a lot like a very obvious bit of political theatre to me, and Duggins/Maton is so dense he keeps walking into it. Man has all the political nous of … something with not much political nous.
It's a strange ask though... there isn't anything wrong with this wording but I'm going to ask you to change it anyway...
Maybe we could do a Charlton and found a CCFC Fans party with a campaign to put the club:s interests first. Maybe then the existing councillors would do something to protect their votes.
Agreed, not really sure why anybody thinks those Tory cunts are on anybody's side but their own?I mean again, Maton being a prick, but he didn’t block it, the Tories just refused to explain the wording and staged a walkout instead.
They chose to interpret it in the way the did though. The only way they could have got to a debate is if they named individuals when they didn't have all the details of who had been having talks.Well initially it was just justify the wording. There’s nothing against the constitution with wording a debate in a way that falsely accuses councillors of something you know they didn’t do, but equally it’s not going to get the best response. If you want a debate on it there’s nothing wrong with not doing it either.
As I say, no ruling was made in the end cos the Tories walked out which was clearly pre-planned because that just doesn’t happen without pre-planning. And one Tory tried to get confirmation from Maton it was blocked and was pulled away by his leadership. Duggins was stupid enough to walk into the trap, but let’s not pretend that it wasn’t a trap.
They chose to interpret it in the way the did though. The only way they could have got to a debate is if they named individuals when they didn't have all the details of who had been having talks.
people have tried and failedMaybe we could do a Charlton and found a CCFC Fans party with a campaign to put the club:s interests first. Maybe then the existing councillors would do something to protect their votes.
Christ.
They chose to interpret it in the way the did though. The only way they could have got to a debate is if they named individuals when they didn't have all the details of who had been having talks.
Why not just have that as the debate topic then? As I say it came across as playing politics rather than any serious attempt to get to the bottom of anything.
What as the topic?
What is the difference between that and if the council were in discussions for a Wasps bailout? Maton's issue was with the term "The Council", wasn't it?
Ironic for a c**t who refers to himself in third person.
No he put up with that for years. He left when he got the price he wanted.Didn’t he leave Newcastle when the fans made it clear he’s not wanted? Dirty protest at Coventry Sports Direct anyone?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?