Philosoraptor
Well-Known Member
When you are talking about the local council ombudsman; do you mean the local council ombudsman or the local council ombudsman?
Doubt it would be covered anyway:
So he was lying when he said he would?No he didn’t. He said he would but he never got the chance. Why?
That’s a friendly welcome back!You should post less!
I genuinely think SISU had every intention of bidding via a backer.I know. I’m still unclear what your allegation is. Several people bid, two stuck around, one won.
Are you saying someone was stopped from bidding? I’m not sure what the relevance of the councils wishes for the arena are.
Yeah I thought Ashley was the only one that guarenteed fundsIt had them all in the Administrators report.
Lot of educated lefties on here.Been a fair few years since I’ve posted on here, despite me still being a regular viewer.
However I couldn’t let the absurdity of this thread go by without comment!
A summary of this thread so far is this:
SBT - “The ruling council group should be held accountable for their involvement in the sale of the stadium”
Local opposition Tory councillors then try to hold the ruling group accountable.
SBT - “bastard Tories don’t care”
Seriously you lot, if you can’t put aside your political tribalism, or separate national politics from local politics then you don’t deserve an accountable council.
Client's a past master of the tongue in cheek remark.That’s a friendly welcome back!
That’s exactly what should happen to be honest.Lot of educated lefties on here.
Someone earlier said that the Sky Blues fans should get politically organised.
Tories face a wipeout next election.
Next Council election the “Sky Blue Party” might work - Tories would protest vote there. Lefties will probably vote left still. But anyway.
Charlton did it. Slightly different situation but still - it worked.
Remembering When Charlton Fans Took On The Labour Party and Won
In 1990, the predominantly Labour council in Greenwich rejected planning permission for Charlton’s home ground to be rebuilt. This led to the formation of The Valley Party, who launched a spectacular fightback.t.co
That’s a friendly welcome back!
If you think this is bad mate, the season resumes again next week. This place is going to become even more fun.
*subject to having a venue to play in.
Didn’t even reach kick off
Nah. I’m happy to hold my hands up and admit that certain things I was probably wrong about when I was last on here. Although not everything, I still detest SisuAre you still oiling up Anne Lucas?
Nah. I’m happy to hold my hands up and admit that certain things I was probably wrong about when I was last on here. Although not everything, I still detest Sisu
it was this image that regrettably stuck in my mind
An Idea
As usual for a Saturday night, Ann Lucas was last night well oiled down the Old Shepherd in Keresley. Could perhaps one of the sixfields goers invite Fisher or Labavitch for a drink up there? Three possible outcomes would occur. 1. They would get together and sort out this mess 2...www.skybluestalk.co.uk
Sisu were in the wrong over Sixfields, no one else. I stand by that
If the tories gave a real fuck then they wouldn't staged a planned fake walkout and they would of clarified what they meant by "council"Been a fair few years since I’ve posted on here, despite me still being a regular viewer.
However I couldn’t let the absurdity of this thread go by without comment!
A summary of this thread so far is this:
SBT - “The ruling council group should be held accountable for their involvement in the sale of the stadium”
Local opposition Tory councillors then try to hold the ruling group accountable.
SBT - “bastard Tories don’t care”
Seriously you lot, if you can’t put aside your political tribalism, or separate national politics from local politics then you don’t deserve an accountable council.
If the tories gave a real fuck then they wouldn't staged a planned fake walkout and they would of clarified what they meant by "council"
see ya in a couple of years fella
Wouldn’t know. I live in Allesley now. You’re probably right thoughWell I do gather Anne and her trusty steed Ray aren’t so popular in them parts of Keresley anymore
They didn't do it at the time did they, they walked out in a pre planned walkout designed to get fools to applaud them.They have clarified what they meant by “the council”. It’s the organisation we all pay tax to each month
What’s your definition ?
They didn't do it at the time did they, they walked out in a pre planned walkout designed to get fools to applaud them.
If they had answered Maton's question they would of been able to debate it but no they even dragged out the one who tried to ask if the debate was being blocked.
Mainly because in a democracy they don’t need to. It was already clarified that the motion was legally sound.
It’s not up to Maton to decide how a legal sound question is worded. You do realise he doesn’t have that authority right?
What rule, regulation, or procedure did the motion break?No it is up to Maton, it's part of his role. In a democracy there are rules, it's not anarchy fella. There are rules, regulations and procedures and Maton is within his rights to challenge if he thinks someone is acting against these rules and regulations.
All they had to do was state what they meant but they didn't want to as it was a trap set up to allow them to "walk out" in teh hope that the a few would fall for it.
Looks like you are one of the few.
I genuinely think SISU had every intention of bidding via a backer.
Storey and his crew probably intimated they would bid as some kind of CCFC buy in, threw in an exclusivity clause which restricted SISUs ability to team up with anyone else (possibly NEC), messed about, dandied Joy down a garden path, during which time MA had exclusivity with 1.2m.
Few would bid without CCFC on board so whilst not blocked, it had the same effect
.
What rule, regulation, or procedure did the motion break?
What do you consider “the council” to be? 54 wannabe despots? Or the organisation that collects our bins (sometimes), repairs the odd pothole, and owns the freehold to the CBS Arena?
You think I’m one of the few?? Read the room mate
Why say “Storey f—-d her?”I mean a few bid. I’m not as convinced as others CCFC is the essential ingredient beyond being the anchor tenant. And I don’t think they’ve seriously got other options.
But otherwise I agree. I think Joy wanted a buyer earlier and Storey fucked her. I’m unsure how this points to a conspiracy and not just shit choice in buyers though .
Why say “Storey f—-d her?”
Some things should be left unthought
So he was lying when he said he would?
To be fair I think this is one of the few threads the tribalism hasn't kicked in.Been a fair few years since I’ve posted on here, despite me still being a regular viewer.
However I couldn’t let the absurdity of this thread go by without comment!
A summary of this thread so far is this:
SBT - “The ruling council group should be held accountable for their involvement in the sale of the stadium”
Local opposition Tory councillors then try to hold the ruling group accountable.
SBT - “bastard Tories don’t care”
Seriously you lot, if you can’t put aside your political tribalism, or separate national politics from local politics then you don’t deserve an accountable council.
Mate, it doesn't matter if it actually broke any rules. Maton rightly or wrongly can challenge a motion for debate if he thinks it breaks the rules. You have just been claiming there are no fucking rules as it's a democracy. Make up your mind.What rule, regulation, or procedure did the motion break?
What do you consider “the council” to be? 54 wannabe despots? Or the organisation that collects our bins (sometimes), repairs the odd pothole, and owns the freehold to the CBS Arena?
You think I’m one of the few?? Read the room mate
Because the ones at the stadium are shockingly employed by the stadiumCCFC advertising fit a groundsperson.
Not sure why they needed to elaborate that it was for the training ground - but y’know….
Your daughter won’t remember her 1st birthday, we will remember you didn’t get us answers quick enough…..Been busy the last two days (daughters first birthday today).
Will check tomorrow
Maximum escalation.Because the ones at the stadium are shockingly employed by the stadium
Thick c**t
Only Jackie Weaver has the right to do thatMainly because in a democracy they don’t need to. It was already clarified that the motion was legally sound.
It’s not up to Maton to decide how a legal sound question is worded. You do realise he doesn’t have that authority right?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?