From the SCG minutes dated 04/12/13
What is Mark Labovitch’s role, title and does he get paid?
Tim Fisher – With regard to Mark Labovitch, from a governance perspective he provides an
independent view for the board. He’s paid a nominal Non Executive Directors fee.
Thank you
In that case if he told SISU he thinks their plan is a bad one and not the right way to go, like he said he did with Ken.
They will either just ignore him or get rid of him.
He is paid by SISU Si as far as I am concerned he is not independent
Who was he doing all this protesting to when Ken was damaging our club?
So in effect no Non-Executive Director is independent?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
To me yes
Unless the are paid by a different source or voluntary
It seems part of the role of a NED is to ensure the plans if the board have sound financial footing.
If he was here during Ken's period, how long has he been here?
Does the current plan to build a stadium have sound financial footing.
Why did he say he does not know how JS intends to recoup the investment. He must know that in order to fulfil his own role?
To me yes
Unless the are paid by a different source or voluntary
It seems part of the role of a NED is to ensure the plans if the board have sound financial footing.
If he was here during Ken's period, how long has he been here?
Does the current plan to build a stadium have sound financial footing.
Why did he say he does not know how JS intends to recoup the investment. He must know that in order to fulfil his own role?
Some people sometimes when faced with tricky questions that they know the answers to but do not want to answer go on the attack instead.
I don't know for definite but is there a pattern every time ML comes up a simple question he should be able to answer but doesn't. Does he then attack ACL, Council, SBT, Higgs?
e call a deflection theory ?
I think top politicians are trained in it in their media training.
Alex Ferguson used to do a form if it as well.
Personally I agree with you Janes if SISU's plan like they maintain is financially viable, they need to explain it to the fans. If they are correct they will convince the fans who need hope of a return.
If they are correct I do not understand why they are not doing it today.
This should not be dropped
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?