They used a lot of black marker pens on that.
So I would guess that the money used by SISU to pay bills and initially invest in the team squad was by investors who knew it was in CCFC. I would guess that if they pressured her to go legal then they are paying the legal costs.Interesting that Joy wrote that she was getting pressured by investors to commence civil action against the Council...
How is it decided what is redacted / covered up on documents like those?
What a complete coincidence.
Usually a public body will have either a lawyer or just a specialist who understands what is or isn't exempt.It should be based upon the Freedom of Information Act. Certain information is completely exempt (such as information provided in confidence or security related information) and other information is subject to a 'public interest test' to decide whether to redact or not. It should be a lawyer or someone else with suitable knowledge of the legislation making the call on it.
Nick, as the owner of the forum can you claim any rights to see the redacted information? I don't think there is anything commercially confidential there
I thought it was ACL that commissioned WS yet they're emailing Coventry Council email addresses
The redaction is odd. For example Fishers name is redacted but Sepallas isn’t.Nick, as the owner of the forum can you claim any rights to see the redacted information? I don't think there is anything commercially confidential there
looks like Coucil were trying to fuck SISU up as quick as they could, serves them right for have them as preferred bidders instead of Manhattan Group