lewys33
Well-Known Member
How far do you expect everyone to keep bending for sisu?
I think you be horrified to know the mainstream views outside this little forum are more reflective of the standpoints taken by torch and others myself.
I have answered. The fall down point he misses is question 3. Clive eakin the last time I looked is not a director of sisu. So the answer to 3 is no as the club will never accept it. They will never pick up the phone and will never negotiate a rent agreement within a company that they no longer will work with on a daily basis.
So as a strategy this whole campaign is flawed. It assumes unless sisu make a move the other sides are not challenged and are not having action against them. Its not us who have nothing serious to add its the kcic campaign that is not serious.
Is that defending though?
Yes it looks that way to me and probably 9000 stay away fans.
He said its irrelevant how many ccfc fans go and watch their team !!!
Lol priceless.
For someone who only supports ccfc and not Sisu, you don't half defend their actions a lot !!!!
How far do you expect everyone to keep bending for sisu?
So it wasn't saying about the figures demonstrating viewpoints and opinions? He just said attendances don't matter full stop?
You like mentioning the 9000 stay away fans as some sort of backup, it probably doesn't look that way as 9000 stayaway fans probably wouldn't know who Grendel was if you asked them. There are probably quite a few who have no idea who Tim Fisher is either.
You seem to be doing a lot of defending yourself !
I'm amazed that your now making assumptions for the 9000 stay away fans !!
Even classing them as not aware of whats going on and knowing who Tim Fisher is !!
Keep digging Yours and Sisu's hole.....
You seem to be doing a lot of defending yourself !
I'm amazed that your now making assumptions for the 9000 stay away fans !!
Even classing them as not aware of whats going on and knowing who Tim Fisher is !!
Keep digging Yours and Sisu's hole.....
Fact?
Fact?
Yes fact !!
Or have you and Nick got any evidence to dispute this ?
Yes fact !!
Or have you and Nick got any evidence to dispute this ?
As you're the one saying it's "fact" then surely you have to provide the evidence?
Yes fact !!
Or have you and Nick got any evidence to dispute this ?
Michael, what is ACL stance on the club returning?
Have they confirmed the rental deal they offered is still there??
Is it just a case of Sisu accepting it or is there room for negotiation on certain aspects of the deal?
Until these questions are answered you can't just say "put pressure on Sisu to accept the deal"
We need to here from ACL
Yes fact !!
Or have you and Nick got any evidence to dispute this ?
Dinosaurs weren't real. Fiction!
So Michael hasn't spoke to acl to confirm then?
You are brilliant. Keep it up.
he has trouble keeping it up! fact!
Prove it
As you're the one saying it's "fact" then surely you have to provide the evidence?
We could equally put pressure on acl to make a statement to say the offer is still open then it's down to Sisu
We could equally put pressure on acl to make a statement to say the offer is still open then it's down to Sisu
1. Most fans want us back at the Ricoh asap - yes/no
2. Comments from players like Wilson make it clear they want to be back at the Ricoh too - yes/no
3. The last offer made by ACL was shown by Clive Eakin to be financially beneficial to the club compared with being at NTFC - yes/no
4. It would be good for fans, players and club finances to return to the ricoh even on a short-term rental deal - yes/no
5. The sides could then take as long as needed for a long-term agreement without the damage being done by being at NTFC - yes/no
6. The process is therefore for sisu to say we will return on the basis of the last ACL offer - yes/no
7. If ACL then renege on that deal all fire is aimed at them - yes/no
Cheers
Ok and then you can try and dispute ?
Fact 1)
We are currently playing home matches at Sixfields Northampton for up to three years approved by the league. With a possible extension.
Fact 2)
Sisu have announced plans to build a new stadium and shown pictures via an artists impression of new stadium.
Fact 3)
Sisu have held and set up committee regarding stadium.
Fact 4)
Sisu have employed CRBE to oversee project and aquire land.
Fact 5)
Sisu say they have held discussions with council authorities who operate outside Coventry's boundaries.
Fact 6)
Sisu on numerous occaisions and press releases have mentioned they are close to aquiring land which is in the Coventry area but not in Coventry.
Hold on. I thought all that lot was bullshit and a new ground would never be built. Are you now saying it's "fact"?
I will look forward to your evidence facts that prove Sisu do have plans to return CCFC to Coventry ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?