Sky Blue Kid
Well-Known Member
Do you mean I've made a Grenduffyism?
Do you mean I've made a Grenduffyism?SBK You must learn to quote someone with their quote or your argument falls flat. Unfortunately Fisher is not quoted saying these things is he? Now the Telegraph reports Coventry City say bl bl bla. That's a whole lot different and can be entirely subjective. Most likely is what the jouno reads into the situation from his overall conversation and then basically misrepresents CCFC in the process. he needs his story to appeal to his audience. FACTS are what really matters. It brings me to the same conclusion when remembering all the arguments about it being fact that CCFC were offered a rent free deal at the Ricoh. Trouble was that was also not the FACT. Same kind of thing really. What some posters (like you in this instance) want to do is take something as fact when it is not and then try and insist it is because you so want it to suit your own opinion. We are not in the room my friend and if you take the word of a newspaper article then you may as well read fiction because that is what most of media is made up of. I do get your original point you were trying to make but it's just not fact.
Do you mean I've made a Grenduffyism?
@ Samo....You remember I called you a Amoeba earlier?.......I've just noticed your Avatar!
Do you mean I've made a Grenduffyism?
If you spent most of the season saying that you wouldn't go to Sixfields as it is your way of demonstrating and then started to go would it be an estimated guess or a blatant lie?
Neither. It would just mean that you are a spineless twat who doesn't know his own mind!
Was it the Grenmiester to whom you referred?
The only "You dirty rat" on this forum is you, You lying piece of cr*p. Even your best mates on here will call you a liar, about your "Estimated Facts" Cast your mind back to when I said Ben Turner was "Reported as being sold to Cardiff for 750k and I took it as the selling figure like most people did. YOU lambasted me for saying it, then in the very same breath quoted another figure as a FACT. When I asked where you got your figures from, YOU said some website(Torchy knows it) that their "Estimations on transfers" were "Pretty close" but because you say the figure is a FACT we all have to believe you. You're a WUM pal. now toddle off down to the hostelry for a swift libation with your chums, there's a good chap!It's amusing that your "estimated fact" quote has become folklore in your own mind as I never even said it. Bit like "you dirty rat" its folklore and somewhat amusing as one fact is true - you never watched Coventry vs. Bury last season on a live streaming. A blatant lie - now that's a fact.
If you spent most of the season saying that you wouldn't go to Sixfields as it is your way of demonstrating and then started to go would it be an estimated guess or a blatant lie?
So the Telegraph are responsible for saying that Coventry will never play in Coventry again then?.......Forget the bit that says...Coventry City say Coventry City will never play in Coventry again..... So those last 11 words were never said then?.............hill83...kiss my arse mate
Nice little family outing video mate..Well done!
Glad you brought that subject up. I remember being criticised for going to Sixfields despite saying I wouldn't. Yet there are many on here who have done a 360 on Sisu and are lauded for changing their mind.
Go figure. Perfect example of SBT double standards, I suppose.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk
The only "You dirty rat" on this forum is you, You lying piece of cr*p. Even your best mates on here will call you a liar, about your "Estimated Facts" Cast your mind back to when I said Ben Turner was "Reported as being sold to Cardiff for 750k and I took it as the selling figure like most people did. YOU lambasted me for saying it, then in the very same breath quoted another figure as a FACT. When I asked where you got your figures from, YOU said some website(Torchy knows it) that their "Estimations on transfers" were "Pretty close" but because you say the figure is a FACT we all have to believe you. You're a WUM pal. now toddle off down to the hostelry for a swift libation with your chums, there's a good chap!
"Sisu said it would no longer fund the club if a stadium deal could not be agreed.
Laura Deering, from Sisu, claimed in the High Court that the organisation only continued to fund the club in 2012 because it believed a stadium deal was likely but had been told in 2011 that there were significant obstacles. "
Taken from a recent CT article I read.
Straight from the horse's mouth.
Why are there still people who think SISU are in it for the club?
Give it a rest. The telegraph wrote that bit, the quote marks were inside these things " ".
The telegraph wrote that first bit........
The bits Fisher was quoted were the bits in quotation marks, I know it is a sensitive subject so I won't go into too much detail.
I put Fisher's quotes in bold for you in an earlier post. Which part of QUOTES don't you understand?
Still funny though when you go off at others for talking shit and claiming things as fact...do you prefer Pampers or Huggies?
Once again your memory fails you. The actual argument centred on Keran Westwood. You claimed someone had told you the fee we paid was £250,000 and I pointed to the fact that the media generally suggested it was £750,000 as did the website. Strangely I think that you laughed at the fact the figure was quoted in the telegraph as being evidence. In this context that in itself would be amusing - I need to find that thread.
Grenduffy, keep wriggling pal. This is one hook you're never getting off.
Yep here it is -- even Astute liked my posts these daysGrenduffy, keep wriggling pal. This is one hook you're never getting off.
It was obvious that talking about politics and finance instead of football was horrendous, but we can now cite proof that there's something even worse than that, talking endlessly about each other. I can't wait to see what new depths are plunged here!
Yep here it is -- even Astute liked my posts these days
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...chard-Wood-could-go/page19?highlight=WESTWOOD
The internet is serious business.
I think you be horrified to know the mainstream views outside this little forum are more reflective of the standpoints taken by torch and others myself.
I have answered. The fall down point he misses is question 3. Clive eakin the last time I looked is not a director of sisu. So the answer to 3 is no as the club will never accept it. They will never pick up the phone and will never negotiate a rent agreement within a company that they no longer will work with on a daily basis.
So as a strategy this whole campaign is flawed. It assumes unless sisu make a move the other sides are not challenged and are not having action against them. Its not us who have nothing serious to add its the kcic campaign that is not serious.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?