D
I think fleck is confirming what the majority of us know. Our owners arnt backing the manager financialy to get out this league and unless they do we arnt going to keep players or sign those that will. Sisu just want their money back and hoping tm can get us promoted on a shoe string so they dont have to spend.
Youde think people like hadji would have learnt from the last 10 years but obviously not unless as i say hes giving joy a good seeing to if hes capable :blue:
Id rather they fuck off and get owners who want to make the club sucesfull but if they are intent on staying then yes invest in the club instead of taking the piss out of us all.
tell me what they hav done to make this club sucesfull since they took over smart arse ?
Grendel ask a stupid question you get a stupid answer !
ahmenHe was backed, he was given money to sign Rose, Lorentzon, Hunt, Ramage and Darius Henderson and bar Rose the others were absolute shite.
Before the start of this season if you'd have said we'd have a squad with Joe Cole and Ben Turner in it and we didn't go up who would you blame? We were backed this season and the manager failed, no one else.
You bring up Cody, Madden, Hanson etc yet Armstrong has scored more than all of those in the league so what's your point there?
Reduced the rent from £1.3 million a season to 100k?Id rather they fuck off and get owners who want to make the club sucesfull but if they are intent on staying then yes invest in the club instead of taking the piss out of us all.
tell me what they hav done to make this club sucesfull since they took over smart arse ?
Back Mowbray properly? How's he not been backed this season?
Please tell me how Walsall, Scunthorpe, Barnsley, Gillingham, Bradford are all above us please? Did I miss them spending millions last summer?
Our budget for this season has been absolutely more than enough to be able to get us out the division. The first half of the season shown that.
Reduced the rent from £1.3 million a season to 100k?
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
ACL were never going to sell the Ricoh under the £1.3 million circumstances.At what price though? Spending a season in Northampton, losing out on buying the Ricoh,with the possibility of never owning our own ground. Yay! Good trade!
Agree sb. Despite sisu doing one or two things well They have overall destroyed the club and fanbase. You only have to look at how many of our players are now out of contract this year due to sisu being very short sighted, not having a clue how to run a football club and not wanting to invest in the club or team.
I'm merely pointing out the contradiction in your statement. You don't want them but you expect their money never the less.
I'd be happy if they left, but then I have to accept that we would only be as financially capable as our own generated revenue would allow.
He was backed, he was given money to sign Rose, Lorentzon, Hunt, Ramage and Darius Henderson and bar Rose the others were absolute shite.
Before the start of this season if you'd have said we'd have a squad with Joe Cole and Ben Turner in it and we didn't go up who would you blame? We were backed this season and the manager failed, no one else.
You bring up Cody, Madden, Hanson etc yet Armstrong has scored more than all of those in the league so what's your point there?
I would point out that since going top of thr league in November, TM signed:
Lorentzson - 31
Rose - 26
Ramage - 32
Cole (perm) - 34
Hunt - 34
Henderson - 34
Spence - 19
Sayoud -18
Gadzhev - 28
Cargill - 19
Stephens - 22
Jones - 18
You look at some of those signings, and TM made duff decisions and couldn't have used the money more wisely to strengthen rather than bring in a loaf of players that hardly played
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
He may have also signed the best he could afford under the constraints of the budget. So was it TM's "duff decision" or was it a "duff" budget or do we just accept that that is the situation and we just have to pick the best of a bad bunch and hope they come good rather than struggle on with a squad that isn't big enough to cope with the injury chrisis we hit? The latter is what I would say is nearest the truth.
Who did the other teams competing at the top in league one sign in January that were better and attracted higher wages? We also retained Maddison who you think is a £5 million player isn't he?
Why don't you tell me? You've clearly done the legwork and know all the fees and wages of all the moves.
What's Maddison got to do with it? Oh, I see. You can't attack the point so you attack the poster. Same old same old with you.
it seems many expect perfect seasons from managers, there is always gonna be mistakes just like players make.
maybe he didnt spend well on a few, maybe he got best he could with budget who knows.
what we do know is that
jones,rose,cole helped the team, the rest are not gonna hurt us moving forwards on long contracts so its not really the end of the world.
we are in a bad position and whilst it owuld have been great to get promoted 1st time(and it was on) i think it is sensible to give TM 2-3 years to sort this club out
No I haven't a clue. It's note making a point it's you. If you've just made it up with no factual evidence fair enough - just makes you look a bit silly.
Maddison has something to do with it as we retained a player that was generally regarded as a £5 million player.
Look how long it took Fergie to get a decent replacement for Schmeichel...
He may have also signed the best he could afford under the constraints of the budget. So was it TM's "duff decision" or was it a "duff" budget or do we just accept that that is the situation and we just have to pick the best of a bad bunch and hope they come good rather than struggle on with a squad that isn't big enough to cope with the injury chrisis we hit? The latter is what I would say is nearest the truth.
Who did the other teams competing at the top in league one sign in January that were better and attracted higher wages? We also retained Maddison who you think is a £5 million player isn't he?
Look how long it took Fergie to sort the club out before going on to achieve football immortality at Man U. Some of the posters on here would have had him sacked within six months and then spent the next twelve years complaining that they'd never won anything.
So you'd retain a manager just because it worked for another club 30 years ago.
Great plan. I'm sure if we'd stuck with peter Reid through the bad times we'd now be drooling over a champions league final.
Bang on, bar the likes of Wigan, Millwall and sheff united, there aren't many teams that could match us for wages. The vast majority of league one managers work under a budget, he could have not bothered signing for example Ramage, hunt, Lorentzson and Henderson and easily brought in at least one if not two higher caliber players.
Anyone would think we pay peanuts at cov.
And yes tony, I believe some of these signings have been duff decisions my the manager. He was happy with the budget which is why he agreed to stay on as manager.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
So who would you get in wasn't TM one of the bedt managets available at the time?
Most supporters seemed to believe it at the time.
Who wpuld do a better job?
Look how long it took Fergie to get a decent replacement for Schmeichel...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?