But we were ordered to pay the money up until yesterday and it didn't happen.. Why should Sisu get anymore extensions? The rules are there for a reason, what point is their having them if you can't enforce them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The FL will make some excuse to not deal with this situation once and for all, they don't have the teeth, guts or desire to stand up to owners of football clubs..A points deduction could be issued and more deadlines put in place, but the pattern emerging is alarming. If not dealt with properly it will only allow the situation to carry on causing more pain for fans which not 1 party involved are considering...
The FL need to look at the amount of times they are discussing the state of our club and act with more than just points deductions. The decline on and off the field should allow them to protect the club instead of prolonging and increasing the damaged caused by the owners.
As Nick says, but not to you, where are the posts that say many fans are delighted.
You really are a dick.
You can't even read can you? Some want more than a points penalty it seems.
And some will blame the fans or even the Council, Joe Elliot, The Sky Blue Trust, Jimmy Hill Andy Thorn anyone Barr the culprits Sisu,
So they need to pay up and then we can get on with the new season without having to blame anyone.
Why can't the club issue a simple one paragraph statement on this problem on the website or the FL issue something in the media for us?
Then again it would probably take 5 minutes.
How do we know that the league have delayed themselves the process in view of the £300,000 payment ACL have received? The timing of the rease of the information was interesting was it not?
Sisu are apparently trying to be more open with the fans, they need to do this asap they read these posts so should know that City fans are not very happy.
Here is there chance to try and repair some of the damage they have caused thou there ignorance and invisibility.
Out of interest, beyond the press statement quoted in the telegraph article, what more do you want them to say?
The Truth, they should have been more open from the beginning. Stop employing spin doctors and just say it as it is.
you were at one of the meetings with myself what did you get out of it except for the loss of 3 hours of your life?
The Truth, they should have been more open from the beginning. Stop employing spin doctors and just say it as it is.
you were at one of the meetings with myself what did you get out of it except for the loss of 3 hours of your life?
Deleted member 5849 said:Out of interest, beyond the press statement quoted in the telegraph article, what more do you want them to say?
Stop employing spin doctors? What exactly are weber Shandwick doing for ACL then?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Stop employing spin doctors? What exactly are weber Shandwick doing for ACL then?
I was only talking about this particular instance myself
I'd
I know this might escape you sometimes, but we don't support ACL FC. The question was what should the club do to regain fan trust. It's comments like that that make people think that some are rabidly pro-Sisu. It's OK to talk about CCFC on a CCFC forum without comparing it to how ACL would've done it.
To clarify: ACL do not have a relationship to manage with us. Our only relationship with them comes through the club. The club DO have a relationship to manage, arguably it's their entire business model is managing their relationship with us. Ergo we have a right to different expectations. Also known as "I don't care what Tommy's parents let him do!".
Maybe they are just to keep moral up at ACL.
I can only think they are singing "Two Princes" on loop.
Sorry Shmmeee but it is wholly relevant, especially when there are already a number of posts on here and the forum as a whole stating that sisu are losing the PR war, so if ACL and their spin doctors aren't relevant who are they warring with?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
It's not relevant to this discussion though. This isn't a zero sum game, we can discuss the club without dragging ACL into it. Stating that we'd like the club to stop using spin doctors when talking to the fans implies no comment on ACL's use thereof.
Stop employing spin doctors? What exactly are weber Shandwick doing for ACL then?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
But what do they have to do with the situation we are in they do not own our club?
Not bothered about all the other shit only CCFC.
(Fingers in the ears) lalalalalalalalalalalalalsllaalalal only sisu are 100% to blame lalalalalalalalalalalalalsllaalalal
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
They're 100% responsible for us not coming back.
You can argue the blame game all you like for the circumstances that we left under but only one party is stopping us returning and they've said as much themselves.
Surely all fans want us back so we all should be blaming sisu 100%.
How do we know that the league have delayed themselves the process in view of the £300,000 payment ACL have received? The timing of the rease of the information was interesting was it not?
And around and around we go..,
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
And around and around we go..,
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
It's sisu's merry go round my friend. Only one party has moved position in trying to get us back if only on a temporary deal. The other has only ever said that they can't forgive, despite the apparent Christian beliefs of the top dog.
So what are you saying exactly? You're not a Cov fan? You are happy for the club to stay at suxfields? You don't care what happens to the club as long as you can do some council bashing?
No not SISU, I seem to remember somebody had lodged an appeal with Companies House, somebody who thought the Holdings accounts should not be allowed to 'disappear' without public scrutiny? Anyone remember this?
Like so much of the details of this whole mess, I don't think the party lodging the objection was ever disclosed. Show me where it was, me I'm just speculating?
No we never found out who it was but it may have caused SISU a problem
I think the move was designed to cause ACL a problem, on that we shall have to agree to disagree.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?