It is too early for this
It is too early Nick, but I happen to agree with the OP. When he first came back to us he was abysmal really but tbf he hasn't played competitive football for 4 years. He was bound to be rusty. He has improved technically and his performances at the end of the season were great. He is younger and fitter just needs to add game awareness and tackling and he will be decent. A good player at league 1 and not cost a fortune.
What I don't get is if he was signing why wasn't it done at the start so he could get a full pre season with us to battle that rustiness?
If Newcastle aren't fussed about him and we want him, he should have ended his contract by mutual consent back in June so he was a free agent so he could get a full pre season with friendlies etc.
I feel there's still a good player in him somewhere. It doesn't just disappear. Had a horrible time away from football and like King said he's hardly played any of note for some time. He's well worth a contract. Even if it's just until Christmas with a clause where it's extended if he plays X games.
What I don't get is if he was signing why wasn't it done at the start so he could get a full pre season with us to battle that rustiness?
If Newcastle aren't fussed about him and we want him, he should have ended his contract by mutual consent back in June so he was a free agent so he could get a full pre season with friendlies etc.
I think he has another year on his contract doesn't he? So that will need to be sorted, then he has to come down from what he was on before to 1.5 - 2k a week.
Guys, Bigi came from the youth team and has Twitter.
He has to sign.
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
I think we should get him in.
Saw enough in him , when fleck was banned , to tell me he can run a midfield
Besides that , we won't be getting a premier league experienced midfield player from anywhere else
Nope, he's more ukulele.He is hardly Makelele is he?
Now this worries me!I am hoping that Vincelot has gone to bring Gael back on a perm. He will be better than Fleck and Vince in one season. He was brilliant the last couple of games of the season, his passing was a joy, his energy was impressive and he was niggly and was snapping at opponents ankles. Clearly TM's advice and it was working.
Mowbray says he sold Vincelot so the club can build, that must mean replacing him with someone younger with good potential....?
I really hope Gael comes back. Any fans that have a decent football brain can see that he still has a lot of potential to be unlocked. I for one would be delighted
I think we should get him in.
Saw enough in him , when fleck was banned , to tell me he can run a midfield
Besides that , we won't be getting a premier league experienced midfield player from anywhere else
They should make a movie of that deception.We did once have a premier league striker - Simeon Jackson who actually had played in the Premier League.
Are you saying vincelot was?He is hardly Makelele is he?
Are you saying vincelot was?
So you compared him to one the best midfielders chelsea have ever had instead?No, but I wasn't trying to big him up as a player with Premier League experience either!
So you compared him to one the best midfielders chelsea have ever had instead?
he showed nothing, hence why he isn't coming back.wouldnt mind him back, he showed signs of what hes capable off in moments last season
Are you having a laugh? We need to move on from these jokers like we did with Aaron Philips and Connor ThomasI'd take him back in a heartbeat. A few games under his belt and completely match-fit, he'd be one of the best midfielders in this division.
People who cannot see his ability and potential do not understand football and should start following rounders instead.
I'd take him back in a heartbeat. A few games under his belt and completely match-fit, he'd be one of the best midfielders in this division.
People who cannot see his ability and potential do not understand football and should start following rounders instead.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?