Grendel
Well-Known Member
He is not banned - I would have removed the offensive post. Not the other one that was removed - no
And your opinion is as valid as anyone else’s. Would you have administered a similar ban to whoever it was that posted the racist trope about dogs being born in stables or whatever it was?
That the Oxford Dictionary definition.So the posts you want to delete are illegal and would be liable for prosecution?
Not banned and posted another shit load of racist stuff on Saturday night.He is not banned - I would have removed the offensive post. Not the other one that was removed - no
They went running straight away to their muslim solicitor who was then saying it was attempted assisiation. It's gone quiet when the other footage was released. They should get the book thrown at them same as anyone
Because he was that's all, it's like look look look what the nasty policeman did. And yes I'm sure British thugs will be running to a solicitor tooWhy do you have to say their Muslim solicitor?
You can be bound sure, if that was some white, British thuggery, they would be running to a solicitor too.
I am sure there are solicitors from all walks of life who would have been interested in the case of the guy kicked in the head by a police officer.
That the Oxford Dictionary definition.
Do you think racist posts should be allowed on here? Yes or no?
It doesn't. As I said he wouldn't have said "white solicitor".Who says that's not going to happen? Why does the fact that they or their solicitor is Muslim matter?
If its is breaking the law as a race hate crime no.
I hate to break this to you but what you want banned is from what I see standard Reform type comments. Reform is not defined as a racist party and therefore anyone spouting those views on here has to - for the sake of free speech - be allowed to. Any forum is a reflection of society. Excluding legal and legitimate elements as it may offend you is a very slippery slope indeed.
It doesn't. As I said he wouldn't have said "white solicitor".
I am not talking about opinions on immigration or anything like that. I am asking about racism.If its is breaking the law as a race hate crime no.
I hate to break this to you but what you want banned is from what I see standard Reform type comments. Reform is not defined as a racist party and therefore anyone spouting those views on here has to - for the sake of free speech - be allowed to. Any forum is a reflection of society. Excluding legal and legitimate elements as it may offend you is a very slippery slope indeed.
Colour wouldn't come into it for me. Never does. Obviously for some it's different.I think if a member of the EDL defended someone in these riots as he was a qualified solicitor would have not just been viewed by you as a solicitor
Mmm..I am not talking about opinions on immigration or anything like that. I am asking about racism.
Do you agree with the club that racism is unacceptable in all its forms and should not be tolerated?
ideologically I am kind of opposed to this view, however logically and rationally I am actually supportive of this view.
I do think some of it is a matter of taste though, I hate coming on here and seeing people spout the kind of crap we’ve seen. It’s probably a lack of intelligence as opposed to deliberate racism (hopefully), but I feel it tarnishes us, the club, the city to see it trotted out here.
I guess.. the law is one thing but what kind of standards do you want to set
I never mentioned a colourColour wouldn't come into it for me. Never does. Obviously for some it's different.
I am not talking about opinions on immigration or anything like that. I am asking about racism.
Do you agree with the club that racism is unacceptable in all its forms and should not be tolerated?
That must be why you're completely silent about things when the offenders skin colour is different.Colour wouldn't come into it for me. Never does. Obviously for some it's different.
Yes or no?Can you read? I have answered. The law is the answer.
True. I will rephrase. I would never say "Muslim" or "British".I never mentioned a colour
Yes or no?
You still haven't answered the question. Do you think racism is unacceptable in all its forms and should not be tolerated?The answer is that Racism is defined by the state --- not by offended by Hertfordshire Man -- and I have not seen anything on here in the last weekend that can be defined as racist
I bet she doesn't pull that same face in court.
imagine doing jail for nicking fake shoezone crocs
Because he was that's all, it's like look look look what the nasty policeman did. And yes I'm sure British thugs will be running to a solicitor too
Ironically, they will probably just mean the government pay to fix them back up after they damage them using their "tax money".I bet she doesn't pull that same face in court
This just came through to my missus.
View attachment 37481
Absolute tossers
TomRad85... apologies if you haven't made extreme right wing anti immigration comments on here before I must have mixed you up with someone else.Eh what have I done? I have a Turkish wife and half Turkish kid, why the fuck would I want a race riot you fucking c**t?
Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk
It fills the narrative.Because he was that's all, it's like look look look what the nasty policeman did. And yes I'm sure British thugs will be running to a solicitor too
It fills the narrative.
At every opportunity you mention muslims, or immigration.
Anyone without any agenda would have just said "they ran to their solicitor."
You have been doing it an awful lot. I find it quite telling.
Tbf, as much as you pissed me off. I accept the apology.TomRad85... apologies if you haven't made extreme right wing anti immigration comments on here before I must have mixed you up with someone else.
It's wrong. Two wrongs don't make a right.Like it or not, there are people doing the same thing at the other end of the spectrum.
TomRad85... apologies if you haven't made extreme right wing anti immigration comments on here before I must have mixed you up with someone else.
Would the hotel chains involved be able to take any action here due to damage caused, lost business etc?
You still haven't answered the question. Do you think racism is unacceptable in all its forms and should not be tolerated?
Can't see why not. There's an element of compensation in the criminal court for damages, and I think there would also be a path through the civil courts (usually to a lower standard of proof, I think). This could get expensive for a few people...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?