How about his wife? Anything on her?Fair enough, if he's your local MP and you like him then I bow to that.
Can see the brexit party and lib dems taking votes off the 2 main parties with all of this infighting/allegations going on
She left him didn’t she?How about his wife? Anything on her?
"Yeah, well i can't hear anyone else laughing" - Jarvis Cockerthe irony here it’s in response to a tweet by a defector Nick Bowles who unlike the labour defectors retains a loyalty to his original routes against Mr Corbyn - the irony is hilarious
Still waiting on the decision from Labour's NEC for their Coventry South candidate.
I do think we need a change there but definitely not from the names being banded around from the local council.
We must have some Labour councillors who are being silent but able to do the job.
Out of the Sultana into the O’Boyle
I always remember one councillor proudly tell me they joined Labour because of Tony Blair.
Is that what it says, i can't be arsed to read it.Fuck me talk about a click bait headline
“Be it Corbyn or whoever, I will always claim Argentina's sovereignty over the Malvinas and South Atlantic islands.”
Basically Corbyn rang her to congratulate her... hidden at the bottom it also says Boris did aswellIs that what it says, i can't be arsed to read it.
How on earth do they get that headline?
Doms bought it hook, line and sinkerHow on earth do they get that headline?
When you read the story Argentina's new president Fernandez has been elected on a platform of reclaiming the Falklands. Both Johnson and Corbyn have given Fernandez their congratulations on winning the election and Fernandez will be seeking talks regarding reclaiming the Falklands from whoever wins our election.
Used to clickbate crap but this takes the biscuit.
How on earth do they get that headline?
When you read the story Argentina's new president Fernandez has been elected on a platform of reclaiming the Falklands. Both Johnson and Corbyn have given Fernandez their congratulations on winning the election and Fernandez will be seeking talks regarding reclaiming the Falklands from whoever wins our election.
Used to clickbate crap but this takes the biscuit.
Doms bought it hook, line and sinker
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
I actually left Coventry to do a Masters in Philosophy, and a good proportion of that was naturally in political philosophy. Probably the only one there not aligned to a political grouping.
I have realised after exchanging tweets with a good few Labour councillors is that we do need change.
I always remember one councillor proudly telling me they joined Labour because of Tony Blair.
Must of been because of his war record.
Always considered myself Labour but I don't recognise many values I would hold to in the local party in Coventry.
You’d be surprised. Labour is a pretty broad church. If you want a party for people like you, best thing is to join one so it has people like you in it. If not then you have to accept your views aren’t popular enough or you aren’t motivated enough to push them (I happily accept both)
I can understand differing views but if I wanted to join a local party mostly full of Conservatives ideas I would join the Conservatives.
So level or one vote out is a Diane Abbott? :wideyed:Yeah, but, Dianne Abbott , yeah, but, Dianne Abbott.
It’s the most simple equation ever. Divide the difference by two then add one. This is on top of the chancellor was going to destroy Labours spending plans, right up to the moment he discovered that he couldn’t explain his own.So level or one vote out is a Diane Abbott? :wideyed:
Saying that those putting it together should have done better. But we know where we are when some make 1 vote out of many such a big deal.
So level or one vote out is a Diane Abbott? :wideyed:
Saying that those putting it together should have done better. But we know where we are when some make 1 vote out of many such a big deal.
It was. And I agree. But you must admit a link to how many votes needed to turn a seat and being level isn't that much of a sin. Just thick fuckers that don't understand. Just adding 1 more would have changed it.It was the same when Phillip Hammond got his figures wrong by tens of billions, ( I think on 2 occadions).
The same when Matt Hancock said 20000 is the same as 21000.
The same when Hancock tried to explain where the money was coming for the 40 new hospitals.
Yeah, but, Dianne Abbott.
It was. And I agree. But you must admit a link to how many votes needed to turn a seat and being level isn't that much of a sin. Just thick fuckers that don't understand. Just adding 1 more would have changed it.
The pause in this...
Oh, and the content!
A Tory spending spree is a tax cut. Part of their offer will be to give what they should have done years ago. Pay freezes finished. Benefit freezes finished.so both parties have announced they're going on a spending spree with the tories doing it in conjunction with tax cuts.
Be interesting to see the working out on from the pair of them though I don't expect Labour to deviate too much from their last manifesto.
Obviously the tories had no costing in their last manifesto I expect this one to be more comprehensive.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?